Cited by 3Digital Mental Health InterventionsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Conversational Interface cooperating with AI and Monitoring Technology adopting Human-in-the-Loop Interaction for Intelligent Behavioral Intervention

Open access
Sun, Xin·2023·28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces

Abstract

The conversational user interface (CUI) for behavioral intervention has great potential to provide cost-effective and efficient solutions that can benefit human health. My PhD project aims to explore the potential of CUI grounded on domain knowledge, equipped with AI models (e.g., text generation and emotion detection), and supported by monitoring technology (mobile and wearable devices) to provide in-time and personalized behavioral intervention. For this purpose, we design a technical scheme for modularly developing such a conversational agent (CA) based on the concept of ‘Human-in-the-Loop’ [3], which enables the agent to continuously improve the integrated AI models and the agent itself. We expect to improve the scheme into an easy-to-use framework (or toolkit) that can improve collaboration between domain experts and developers to efficiently create such a CA. Ultimately, we will explore the interactive technologies of CUI for better behavioral intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3581754.3584115

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conversational interfaces present distinctive design challenges for HITL systems that rely on natural language interaction.

    “Conversational interfaces present distinctive design challenges for HITL systems that rely on natural language interaction.”

    From Human-in-the-Loop Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Methods, and Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [107]

    The Motivation and Research Questions section identifies unique dialogue-design challenges for conversational agents in psychotherapy and behavioral intervention. The Abstract describes a proposed human-in-the-loop conversational agent, but the paper does not establish that these challenges apply to HITL systems relying on natural language interaction generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]6. Siqi Shen, Charles Welch, Rada Mihalcea, and Verónica Pérez-Rosas. 2020. Counseling-Style Reflection Generation Using Generative Pretrained Transform- ers with Augmented Context. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1st virtual meeting, 10-20. https://aclanthology.org/2020.sigdial-1.2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, X.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Sun, Xin
Venue
28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-03-27
Pages
243-245
OpenAlex
W4360978622
Cited by
3
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
conversational interfaces, chatbots, human-in-the-loop, behavioral interventions, emotion recognition, text generation, wearable devices, mobile health monitoring, personalized interventions, domain knowledge, agent development framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review