Cited by 75Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBehavioral Health and InterventionsPhysical Activity and Health

Use of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot App to Promote Stair-Climbing Habits Among Office Workers: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Piao, Meihua, Ryu, Hyeongju, Lee, Hyeongsuk, Kim, Jeongeun·2020·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Lack of time for exercise is common among office workers given their busy lives. Because of occupational restrictions and difficulty in taking time off, it is necessary to suggest effective ways for workers to exercise regularly. Sustaining lifestyle habits that increase nonexercise activity in daily life can solve the issue of lack of exercise time. Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot is a messenger app based on the habit formation model that can be used as a tool to provide a health behavior intervention that emphasizes the importance of sustainability and involvement. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot intervention presented via a messenger app aimed at stair-climbing habit formation for office workers. Methods: From February 1, 2018, to April 30, 2018, a total of 106 people participated in the trial after online recruitment. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=57) or the control group (n=49). The intervention group received cues and intrinsic and extrinsic rewards for the entire 12 weeks. However, the control group did not receive intrinsic rewards for the first 4 weeks and only received all rewards as in the intervention group from the fifth to twelfth week. The Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) of participants was evaluated every week, and the level of physical activity was measured at the beginning and end of the trial. SPSS Statistics version 21 (IBM Corp) was used for statistical analysis. Results: After 4 weeks of intervention without providing the intrinsic rewards in the control group, the change in SRHI scores was 13.54 (SD 14.99) in the intervention group and 6.42 (SD 9.42) in the control group, indicating a significant difference between the groups (P=.04). When all rewards were given to both groups, from the fifth to twelfth week, the change in SRHI scores of the intervention and control groups was comparable at 12.08 (SD 10.87) and 15.88 (SD 13.29), respectively (P=.21). However, the level of physical activity showed a significant difference between the groups after 12 weeks of intervention (P=.045). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that intrinsic rewards are important to enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of an intervention. The Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot program can be a cost-effective method for healthy habit formation. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004009; https://tinyurl.com/w4oo7md

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/15085

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Piao et al reported significant between-group differences in the Self-Report Habit Index when controlled for intrinsic reward via chatbot enables app (P=.008).

    “Piao et al [21] reported significant between-group differences in the Self-Report Habit Index when controlled for intrinsic reward via chatbot enables app (P=.008).”

    From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results section, “Changes of Habit Strength” (page not provided), reports significant between-group SRHI differences at P=.008. But that result is a group-by-time analysis, not an analysis controlled for intrinsic reward. In “Effects of Intrinsic Rewards” (page not provided), the separate comparisons by reward period report P=.04 and P=.21. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of the 15 studies, 7 (47%) targeted healthy lifestyles, and 5 (33%) assessed efficacy of AI chatbots in promoting healthy lifestyles.

    “Out of the 15 studies, 7 (47%) studies [5,21,22,28,29,32,33] targeted healthy lifestyles, and 5 (33%) studies [21,22,28,32,33] assessed the efficacy of AI chatbots in promoting healthy lifestyles through (1) physical activity levels, (2) healthy diet, (3) blood pressure, and (4) BMI.”
  • The Healthy Lifestyle Coaching chatbot was effective in increasing physical activity after 12 weeks of the intervention among office workers.

    “The findings demonstrated that this chatbot was effective in increasing physical activity after 12 weeks of the intervention among office workers.”
  • A study that used a chatbot to promote stair climbing reported a significant increase in physical activity after 12 weeks of intervention, although it is not clear how physical activity was measured and what the effect size was.

    “Finally, we also found a study that used a chatbot to promote stair climbing, and it also reported a significant increase in physical activity after 12 weeks of intervention, although it is not clear how physical activity was measured and what the effect size was [33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piao, M., Ryu, H., Lee, H., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Gachon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ryu, Hyeongju
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2020-05-19
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e15085
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004627142
Cited by
75
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
chatbot intervention, messaging apps, stair climbing, habit formation, office workers, physical activity, intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards, Self-Report Habit Index, health behavior interventions, workplace health promotion, mobile health apps, cost-effectiveness, user satisfaction, user retention
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Mentoring, Adult, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review