Organizational Governance of Emerging Technologies: AI Adoption in Healthcare
Open accessAbstract
Private and public sector structures and norms refine how emerging technology is used in practice. In healthcare, despite a proliferation of AI adoption, the organizational governance (i.e. institutional governance) surrounding its use and integration is often poorly understood. What the Health AI Partnership (HAIP) aims to do in this research is to better define the requirements for adequate organizational governance of AI systems in healthcare settings and support health system leaders to make more informed decisions around AI adoption. To work towards this understanding, we first identify how the standards for the AI adoption in healthcare may be designed to be used easily and efficiently. Then, we map out the precise decision points involved in the practical institutional adoption of AI technology within specific health systems. Practically, we achieve this through a multi-organizational collaboration with leaders from major health systems across the United States and key informants from related fields. Working with the consultancy IDEO.org, we were able to conduct usability-testing sessions with healthcare and AI ethics professionals. Usability analysis revealed a prototype structured around mock key decision points that align with how organizational leaders approach technology adoption. Concurrently, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 89 professionals in healthcare and other relevant fields. Using a modified grounded theory approach, we were able to identify 8 key decision points and comprehensive procedures throughout the AI adoption lifecycle. This is one of the most detailed qualitative analyses to date of the current governance structures and processes involved in AI adoption by health systems in the United States. We hope these findings can inform future efforts to build capabilities to promote the safe, effective, and responsible adoption of emerging technologies in healthcare.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper reports a multi-organizational qualitative study of how U.S. health systems govern AI adoption, identifying 8 key decision points across the AI adoption lifecycle. It finds that health systems are developing individual institutional practices but urgently need shared standards, interdisciplinary evaluation, and new governance roles to support safe, effective, and equitable AI adoption.
Key findings
- The study identified 8 key decision points spanning problem identification and prioritization, requirements/feasibility, outcome measures, workflow design, safety/effectiveness/equity evaluation, rollout, monitoring, and update/decommissioning.
- Health systems are developing individual institutional practices and principles for AI adoption but acknowledge an urgent need for shared standards; the absence of shared frameworks creates duplicate assessment work, disadvantages less-resourced systems, and undermines safety, efficacy, and equity.
- Interviewees emphasized iterative evaluation with interdisciplinary teams including clinicians, technical experts, and data scientists; calibrated clinician trust in AI as “trustworthy but not infallible”; and monitoring clinical care delivery and outcomes, not only model performance.
- The paper reports that AI governance requires new resources and expertise aligned with “algorithmic curators, brokers, and articulators,” and that many participants had not yet updated or decommissioned a model, describing aspirations for future governance.
Methods
- Multi-organizational collaboration launched in April 2022 with 11 healthcare organizations and 2 ecosystem partner sites in the United States, including 6 large academic health systems, 2 multi-region health systems, 2 non-profit health technology vendors, 1 Medicaid health plan, and 2 ecosystem partners.
- A 6-week design sprint with IDEO.org (July–August 2022) included usability-testing sessions: 1 with project leaders, 3 with health system leaders, 2 with external AI ethics experts, and 1 with partner-site representatives; sessions were conducted via Zoom for 1–2 hours in groups of 15–30 people.
- Qualitative research used in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted April 2022–January 2023 with 89 professionals (70 from partner sites; 19 key informants outside healthcare organizations), recruited via purposive and snowball sampling; interviews lasted 34–82 minutes, were transcribed via Otter.ai, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach with two coding cycles in NVivo, stopping at thematic saturation.
Limitations
- The paper states this is “early stage research” and a quality improvement project without human subjects, exempt from IRB approval; it is explicitly focused on the United States context specifically.
- The paper notes that many participants had not yet updated or decommissioned a model, so those findings reflect aspirations for a future state rather than observed practice.
- Evident from the text: the sample is skewed toward partner-site participants (70 of 89), relies on self-reported interview accounts, and uses purposive/snowball sampling, which may limit generalizability beyond the participating health systems and expert informants.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 3 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, positive predictive value number, and false positive and negative rate were commonly referenced by interviewees as model performance metrics.
“Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, positive predictive value number, and false positive and negative rate were commonly referenced by interviewees as model performance metrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants reported difficulty with accessing necessary material for quality assurance, unless the AI software was built in house.
“In this process, the participants reported difficulty with accessing the necessary material, unless the AI software was built in house.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Staff turnover made the fidelity of model adoption particularly challenging because it required ongoing education and training.
“Staff turnover, which happens frequently in clinical care, made the fidelity of model adoption particularly challenging, because it required the need for ongoing education and training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Staff turnover happens frequently in clinical care.
- Findingreasoning
Even if end users trusted the technology, there was the additional challenge of ensuring this trust did not extend beyond the model's competence.
“Even if end users trusted the technology, there was the additional challenge of ensuring this trust did not extend beyond the model's competence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using a modified grounded theory approach, the study identified 8 key decision points and comprehensive procedures throughout the AI adoption lifecycle.
“Using a modified grounded theory approach, we were able to identify 8 key decision points and comprehensive procedures throughout the AI adoption lifecycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Regardless of whether organizations decided to build or buy AI software, they all felt the burden of potential legal and liability risks.
“Regardless of whether the organizations decided to build or buy AI software, they all felt the burden of potential legal and liability risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Buying AI software was sometimes seen as more expensive than building, as adapting the model to a setting where it would be integrated was costly.
“In fact, buying AI software was sometimes seen as more expensive, as adapting the model to a setting where it would be integrated was costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some organizations founded governance committees with enterprise-wide scope to prevent hasty procurement happening in silos.
“In response to this possible risk, we observed that some organizations founded governance committees with enterprise-wide scope to prevent hasty procurement happening in silos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Communicating the plan for rollout of the tool was important for successful clinical integration.
“Communicating the plan for rollout of the tool was important for successful clinical integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Building an appropriate scope of trust between the AI software and end users was known to be a big challenge.
“Building an appropriate scope of trust between the AI software and end users was known to be a big challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants were aware of the concern that end-users would show automation bias and over-rely on the model.
“Participants were aware of the concern that end-users would show automation bias and over-rely on the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
When they were not satisfied with the model and did not perceive the benefit of adopting the model, they decided to abandon it.
“However, when they were not satisfied with the model and did not perceive the benefit of adopting the model, they decided to abandon it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Many organizations described the need for prospective validations of software in a 'silent trial' or 'shadow mode.'
“Many organizations described the need for prospective validations of software in a 'silent trial' or 'shadow mode.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One of the most prevalent challenges in making the integrate-or-abandon decision was a lack of standardization in the decision-making process.
“One of the most prevalent challenges in making this decision was a lack of standardization in the decision-making process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants reported that communication was found to be more effective when it was made by clinical champions or trustworthy leaders in the organizations.
“Participants also reported that the communication was found to be more effective when it was made by clinical champions or trustworthy leaders in the organizations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
A challenge to developing success measures was reconciling the different definitions of success across different affected parties.
“A challenge to developing success measures was reconciling the different definitions of success across different affected parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Criteria for prioritization varied across organizations, including feasibility of solving the problems, severity of clinical condition, number of patients impacted, sense of urgency, use of pre-existing digital infrastructure, organizational goals and strategic initiatives.
“Criteria varied across organizations, including feasibility of solving the problems, severity of clinical condition, number of patients impacted by it, sense of urgency, use of pre-existing digital infrastructure, organizational goals and strategic initiatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
When new tools became available, old tools tended to be abandoned and not used.
“Additionally, when new tools became available, old tools tended to be abandoned and not used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many participants shared that they had not yet updated or decommissioned a model.
“Many participants shared that they had not yet updated or decommissioned a model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants described the difficulty measuring the true impact of the AI component of a solution in isolation, because algorithms are often combined with treatment protocols, follow-up care, and changes in care-team responsibilities.
“Participants described the difficulty measuring the true impact of the AI component of a solution in isolation, because algorithms are often combined with treatment protocols, follow-up care, and changes in care-team responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Algorithms are often combined with treatment protocols, follow-up care, and changes in care-team responsibilities.
- Findingown data
A rare example of model decommissioning was observed with software used for capacity management during the early stages of COVID-19.
“A rare example of model decommissioning was observed with software used for capacity management during the early stages of COVID-19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some participants reported that they had to decommission software that was developed during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic because they no longer found it to be useful.
“Some participants reported that they had to decommission software that was developed during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic because they no longer found it to be useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The frequency of AI system monitoring varied widely across organizations and use cases, ranging from 24/7 to once every 3 years.
“The frequency of AI system monitoring varied widely across organizations and use cases, ranging from 24/7 to once every 3 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Outcome measures defined prior to the model's launch became less relevant benchmarks for evaluation of current outcomes when a model had been implemented for quite some time.
“This was particularly problematic when a model had been implemented for quite some time, as outcome measures defined prior to the model's launch became less relevant benchmarks for the evaluation of current outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants indicated that decisions to decommission a model are very challenging, especially when there is no clear ownership or delegation of responsibility defined for monitoring the model.
“The participants indicated that decisions to decommission a model are very challenging, especially when there is no clear ownership or delegation of responsibility defined for monitoring the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Uncertainty about best practices, stemming in part from the regulatory void, makes health systems more reluctant to be transparent with external interested parties about the ways AI products are used and governed in practice.
“Our research revealed that uncertainty about best practices, stemming in part from the regulatory void, makes health systems more reluctant to be transparent with external interested parties, including other health systems and vendors, about the ways AI products are used and governed in practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our interviews reported that AI governance requires new resources and expertise beyond current capabilities within health systems that align with the categories of algorithmic curators, brokers, and articulators.
“Finally, as indicated earlier, our interviews reported that AI governance requires new resources and expertise beyond current capabilities within health systems that align with the categories of algorithmic curators, brokers, and articulators [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The interviews shed light on the inequities that may arise from the absence and uneven distribution of resources and expertise across business units within a single institution and across institutions themselves.
“The interviews also shed light on the inequities that may arise from the absence and uneven distribution of resources and expertise across business units within a single institution and across institutions themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our qualitative research revealed 8 key decision points across the entire process of adopting AI.
“In the end, our qualitative research revealed 8 key decision points across the entire process of adopting AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The interviews highlighted the importance of testing, validating, and monitoring clinical care delivery and its outcomes, rather than the AI performance.
“The interviews highlighted the importance of testing, validating, and monitoring clinical care delivery and its outcomes, rather than the AI performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our research identified 8 key decision points shared among health systems that can serve as an initial use case for developing shared standards.
“Our research identified 8 key decision points shared among health systems that can serve as an initial use case for developing shared standards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our interviews surfaced a set of common practices that health systems do already engage in.
“While there is no explicitly named shared and comprehensive set of best practices and processes for AI adoption in healthcare, our interviews surfaced a set of common practices that health systems do already engage in.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants described how difficult it was to make clinicians continue to use existing tools when newly launched tools could take priority.
“The participants described how difficult it was to make clinicians continue to use existing tools when newly launched tools could take priority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Monitoring outcomes could be challenging, especially when there was a lack of infrastructure for quality monitoring.
“Monitoring outcomes could be challenging in general, especially when there was a lack of infrastructure for quality monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Despite the challenges, outcome monitoring was still perceived to be important.
“Despite the challenges, outcome monitoring was still perceived to be important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our interviews revealed agreement on the need for iterative evaluation with interdisciplinary teams that include clinicians, technical experts, and data scientists.
“Our interviews also revealed agreement on the need for iterative evaluation with interdisciplinary teams that include clinicians, technical experts, and data scientists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Every layer of the healthcare AI ecosystem currently contains large holes that make the broad diffusion of poorly performing products inevitable.
“Drawing on the Swiss Cheese Model of Pandemic Defense [26], every layer of the healthcare AI ecosystem currently contains large holes that make the broad diffusion of poorly performing products inevitable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
There is currently no clear and established governance ecosystem specifically for AI use in healthcare.
“There is currently no clear and established governance ecosystem specifically for AI use in healthcare.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Regulatory uncertainty externalizes costs onto health systems that would otherwise be borne by the vendor.
“This regulatory uncertainty externalizes costs onto health systems that would be otherwise borne by the vendor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vendors have a vested interest in positioning their products as not requiring regulatory approval or fitting under discretionary enforcement.
- Interpretationreasoning
The absence of shared frameworks creates social and economic costs on individual health systems.
“Not only does the absence of shared frameworks create social and economic costs on individual health systems, but it also impedes adoption of AI and undermines safety, efficacy, and equity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Their access to health system leaders could subvert the problem-led and principle guided processes around AI adoption and integration.
“Their access to health system leaders could subvert the problem-led and principle guided processes around AI adoption and integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Interdisciplinary collaborations promote efficient assessment of requirements, implementation feasibility, and development of outcome measures.
“Interdisciplinary collaborations promote efficient assessment of requirements, implementation feasibility, and development of outcome measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Interdisciplinary collaborations ensure the quality of clinical care by addressing different scenarios of use case, potential risks in bias, security, privacy, and mitigations.
“They also ensure the quality of clinical care by addressing different scenarios of use case, potential risks in bias, security, privacy, and mitigations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 100
- May combine two claims. 44
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningParticipants hoped to build trust in AI software to a degree where clinical end users trusted the technology and found it useful, but not to a degree where they would fully rely on it in making decisions.
“Participants hoped to build trust in AI software to a degree where clinical end users trusted the technology and found it useful, but not to a degree where they would fully rely on it in making decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants cautioned that model evaluation may have to change over time, as the model performance may drift due to changes made in clinical care.
“The participants cautioned that model evaluation may have to change over time, as the model performance may drift due to changes made in clinical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Model performance may drift due to changes made in clinical care.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenOne of the most common practices of building a user-friendly UI was to make it simple and customize it for different groups of users and different sites of users.
“One of the most common practices of building a user-friendly UI was to make it simple and customize it for different groups of users and different sites of users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants felt it was important to define which metrics organizations should measure to determine the success of the AI solution.
“In addition to the model performance metrics, participants felt it was important to define which metrics the organizations should measure to determine the success of the solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants felt motivated to build AI in-house when it did not exist in the market or they were skeptical about an existing model.
“Participants felt motivated to build AI in-house when it did not exist in the market or they were skeptical about an existing model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVendors often did not have or were not willing to share material needed for quality assurance.
“Vendors often did not have or were not willing to share the material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that a new workflow involving AI software should be designed before the software was integrated into clinical practice.
“The participants reported that a new workflow involving AI software should be designed before the software was integrated into clinical practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCommon methods of prospective validation included conducting a silent trial, comparing the model outcomes to patient charts in the medical record, and conducting a pilot on a subset of patients.
“Common methods of prospective validation included conducting a silent trial, comparing the model outcomes to patient charts in the medical record, and conducting a pilot on a subset of patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn communications leading up to clinical integration, it was critical to explain short-term and long-term benefits of using the tool and to answer potential questions from end users.
“In communications leading up to clinical integration, it was also critical to explain the short-term and long-term benefits of using the tool and to answer potential questions from end users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants emphasized the importance of well-defined, narrow intended uses of AI.
“Despite the potential benefits of using AI, participants emphasized the importance of well defined, narrow intended uses of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants reported that assessing the quality of data used to train and validate the model was an important step for ensuring the safety and efficacy of the model.
“The participants reported that assessing the quality of data used to train and validate the model was an important step for ensuring the safety and the efficacy of the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants described that the launch of the tool was disseminated via various communication platforms, including email and website, depending on the target audience.
“The participants described that the launch of the tool was disseminated via various communication platforms, including email and website, depending on the target audience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants highlighted the importance of recognizing changes caused by AI implementation and providing necessary support to front-line workers reconciling these changes.
“Given that implementation of the AI software would create inevitable changes in the existing workflow, they also highlighted the importance of recognizing the changes and providing necessary support to front-line workers reconciling these changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Implementation of AI software would create inevitable changes in the existing workflow.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTo mitigate risks, participants suggested organizations should deeply understand regulatory requirements and work with a group of people with expertise in the full breadth of relevant domains when evaluating the model.
“To mitigate these risks, participants suggested that organizations should deeply understand regulatory requirements and work with a group of people with expertise in the full breadth of relevant domains when evaluating the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants pointed out that business administrators who do not have sufficient knowledge in patient care were typically the ones who evaluated AI algorithms.
“The participants pointed out that business administrators who do not have sufficient knowledge in patient care were typically the ones who evaluated AI algorithms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIf communicating directly with end users was not feasible, developers should at least speak with frontline clinicians or clinical leaders who were trusted by the end users.
“If communicating directly with the end users was not feasible, the developers should at least speak with frontline clinicians or clinical leaders who were trusted by the end users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne participant suggested that simulation-based training would be the most effective method of education and training.
“One participant suggested that simulation-based training would be the most effective method of education and training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter evaluating safety, efficacy, and equity concerns, organizations decide to move forward with adopting AI software or to stop the process.
“After evaluating the safety, efficacy, and equity concerns of the model, the organizations decide to move forward with adopting the AI software or to stop the process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAfter evaluation, an organization decides to clinically integrate or abandon the AI software.
“After the evaluation, an organizations decides to clinically integrate or abandon the AI software.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants shared that having a standardized structure or guideline for risk assessment and clinical integration decisions would be helpful for making informed decisions.
“The participants shared that having a standardized structure or guideline for risk assessment and clinical integration decisions would be helpful for making informed decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants highlighted the importance of understanding the context in which problems were identified, especially when organizational leaders raised the problems.
“The participants highlighted the importance of understanding the context in which the problems were identified, especially when the organizational leaders raised the problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants noted that organizations were frequently approached by vendors, and there could be external pressures to procure AI software.
“The participants also noted that the organizations were frequently approached by vendors, and there could be external pressures to procure AI software.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe factors were grouped into 8 thematic areas that described key decision points across the entire process of adopting AI.
“The factors were grouped into 8 thematic areas that described key decision points across the entire process of adopting AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIt was critical that end users of the AI software were involved in developing the new workflow and provided context into the current state.
“As algorithm developers tend to have limited insight into an existing workflow, it was critical that end users of the AI software were involved in the process of developing the new workflow and provided context into the current state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Algorithm developers tend to have limited insight into an existing workflow.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants proposed to design the new workflow in line with the existing one to minimize the changes made in implementation.
“The participants proposed to design the new workflow in line with the existing one to minimize the changes made in implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor AI software to cause minimal friction, designing an intuitive user interface was an important component for optimizing technical aspects of workflow.
“For the AI software to cause minimal friction, designing an intuitive user interface (UI) was also an important component for optimizing technical aspects of workflow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChallenges in aligning affected parties included identifying key affected parties and aligning different priorities across all affected parties.
“Challenges in aligning affected parties included identifying key affected parties who should be involved in making the decision and aligning different priorities across all affected parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnce the model was ready for clinical integration, participants proposed to implement it incrementally in clinical settings to minimize potential harm in patient care caused by unforeseen safety issues.
“Then, once the model was ready for clinical integration, participants proposed to implement it incrementally in clinical settings to minimize the potential harm in patient care that could be caused by unforeseen safety issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants noted that model validation could be a time-consuming process, which could take many months.
“The participants noted that model validation could be a time-consuming process, which could take many months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe target audience of the communication included end users of the tool, those who would oversee change management, and those who would be impacted by the change.
“The target audience of the communication included not only end users of the tool but also those who would oversee change management and those who would be impacted by the change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants reported that it is important to verify whether AI is indeed an appropriate solution to a problem.
“The participants also reported that it is important to verify whether AI is indeed an appropriate solution to a problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe participants reported two dominant ways problems were initially identified as meriting investment: frontline workers surfaced daily pain points, or organizational leadership led problem identification.
“The participants reported two dominant ways problems were initially identified as meriting investment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen valid AI software already existed in the market or organizations lacked resources to build, participants felt motivated to buy AI from external vendors.
“On the other hand, when the valid AI software already existed in the market or the organizations lacked the resources to build, including data for validation and internal expertise, the participants felt motivated to buy AI from external vendors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningValidating the model on real-time data prior to clinical integration was seen as a key component of assessing the safety, efficacy, and equity concerns of the model.
“Validating the model on real-time data prior to clinical integration was seen as a key component of assessing the safety, efficacy, and equity concerns of the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants agreed that many operational and clinical parties have heard of AI but do not have much knowledge in it.
“Participants agreed that many operational and clinical parties have heard of AI but do not have much knowledge in it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOutcomes commonly captured in success metrics included improvements in patient outcomes, reductions in burden on healthcare providers, and reductions in cost.
“Outcomes commonly captured in the success metrics included improvements in patient outcomes, reductions in burden on healthcare providers, and reductions in cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants suggested that being aware of the potential risks would be the first step.
“They suggested that being aware of the potential risks would be the first step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants described how assessments of requirements and feasibility were often inefficient, with resources and capabilities decentralized and duplicated across the organization.
“Yet, the participants described how these assessments were often inefficient, with resources and capabilities decentralized and duplicated across the organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that organizations often decide not to move forward with adoption when the model was no longer valuable, not implementable, not interoperable, too expensive, or unsuccessful in a pilot launch.
“The participants reported that organizations often decide not to move forward with the adoption process when the model was no longer valuable, not implementable, not interoperable, too expensive, or unsuccessful in a pilot launch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that in making decisions to develop or adapt AI software, all affected parties from various disciplines must be aligned.
“The participants reported that in making decisions to develop or adapt AI software, all affected parties from various disciplines, including AI specific committees and specialists in clinical, operational, and technical areas, must be aligned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSimplicity in the user interface could be achieved by standardizing the visualization of the model, conducting usability tests with users, and using technology that was already familiar to users.
“Simplicity in the user interface could be achieved by standardizing the visualization of the model, conducting usability tests with users, and using technology that was already familiar to users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
FindingreasoningThe governance body should work closely with frontline workers knowledgeable and experienced in clinical care and community members to promote equity in healthcare.
“For instance, the governance body should work closely with frontline workers who are knowledgeable and experienced in clinical care and community members to promote equity in healthcare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants emphasized that clinical personnel must be part of the evaluation process.
“To ensure the safe, effective, and equitable use of AI software, participants emphasized that clinical personnel must be part of the evaluation process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMany participants recommended validating the model on underserved populations as well as a large representative sample of populations to ensure equal model performance across different groups of patients.
“Many also recommended validating the model on underserved populations as well as a large representative sample of populations to ensure equal model performance across different groups of patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants raised a need for a standardized structure of quality assurance and active communication across organizations.
“Given the lack of documentation and the amount of due diligence required, the participants raised a need for a standardized structure of quality assurance and active communication across organizations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants described the need to tailor education and training to the target audience, their role, and the scale of change management.
“Participants described the need to tailor education and training to the target audience, their role, and the scale of change management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTo ensure safe, effective, and equitable use of AI software, participants indicated organizations should be aware of potential risks and have plans to mitigate them from early on.
“To ensure the safe, effective, and equitable use of AI software, the participants indicated that organizations should be aware of the potential risks and have plans to mitigate them from early on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenInvolving members of underserved communities from the early stage of problem identification was raised as an aspirational and impactful practice.
“Involving members of underserved communities from the early stage of problem identification was raised as an aspirational and impactful practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants suggested making algorithm developers have conversations with end users to provide transparent explanations about the model with trustworthy data and make them familiar with AI and its use.
“The first approach was to make algorithm developers have conversations with end users to provide transparent explanations about the model with trustworthy data and make them become familiar with AI and its use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCommon practices of data quality assurance were ensuring minimal bias in data, creating a diverse data set for training the model, and cleaning data before building the model.
“Some of the common practices of data quality assurance were ensuring that there was minimal bias present in data, creating a diverse data set for training the model, and cleaning data before building the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningIt was important to perform thorough data quality assurance, even though it required significant resources.
“Given that healthcare data is messy and may contain bias, it was important to perform thorough data quality assurance, even though it required significant resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Healthcare data is messy and may contain bias.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataGaining trust from frontline clinicians or clinical leaders was found to be an efficient way to slowly build trust with the end user community.
“Gaining trust from them was found to be an efficient way to slowly build trust with the end user community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenWhen all interested parties were satisfied with the model, they decided to integrate the model into clinical practice.
“When all interested parties were satisfied with the model, they decided to integrate the model into clinical practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningModel validation was an essential process, especially when testing model accuracy on retrospective labels might not be sufficient due to inaccuracies in ground truth labels.
“Yet, it was an essential process to go through, especially when testing model accuracy on retrospective labels might not be sufficient for model validation due to inaccuracies in ground truth labels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants suggested that a decision to clinically integrate or abandon the model should be made based on evidence supported by data and that organizations should be open to making an abandonment decision at any given point.
“The participants suggested that a decision to clinically integrate or abandon the model should be made based on evidence supported by data and that the organizations should be open to making an abandonment decision at any given point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA commonly described unique contribution of AI was the use of data to promote efficiency in clinical care.
“Yet, a commonly described unique contribution of AI was the use of data to promote efficiency in clinical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants reported that the biggest challenge in operational monitoring was staff turnover.
“The participants reported that the biggest challenge in operational monitoring was staff turnover.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Staff turnover happens frequently in clinical care.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOrganizations conduct a comprehensive review of data and evaluate AI software before routinely using it in clinical practice.
“This thematic area describes how the organizations conduct a comprehensive review of data & evaluate the AI software before they routinely use the software in clinical practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIf disparities were detected in model performance among different patient populations, participants suggested addressing these issues by adjusting thresholds based on the disparities in model performance.
“If there were any disparities detected in the model performance among different patient populations, participants suggested addressing these issues by adjusting thresholds based on the disparities in the model performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn defining model metrics, it was seen to be important to ensure that the model performs similarly on subgroups stratified by important demographic factors so that patients receive equitable care.
“In defining the model metrics, it was seen to be important to ensure that the model performs similarly on subgroups stratified by important demographic factors so that patients receive equitable care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants suggested showing end users how clinically valuable it would be to use the tool by showing them real-world evidence from the local context.
“The second approach was to show end users how clinically valuable it would be to use the tool by showing them real-world evidence from the local context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe results identified challenges and risks that organizations experience in the process of AI adoption as well as real-world processes and practices.
“The results identified challenges and risks that organizations experience in the process of AI adoption as well as real-world processes and practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFrom a technical standpoint, participants proposed to set clear eligibility criteria and model performance thresholds for a given model.
“From a technical standpoint, the participants proposed to set clear eligibility criteria and model performance thresholds for a given model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAll safety, effectiveness, and equity concerns should be taken into consideration throughout the entire process of AI adoption.
“While prospective model validation takes place once the model is integrated into IT infrastructure, it is important to note that all other safety, effectiveness, and equity concerns should be taken into consideration throughout the entire process of AI adoption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants described many instances in which software with simple decision logic can be a viable solution with greater transparency and lower resource requirements than AI or machine learning.
“Participants described many instances in which software with simple decision logic can be a viable solution with greater transparency and lower resource requirements than AI or machine learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataEducation and training materials were disseminated in various ways, frequently including online learning management systems and webinars.
“Education and training materials were disseminated in various ways, frequently including online learning management systems and webinars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBi-directional communication between developers and users was seen as key, both to allow adaptations needed to accommodate end users' needs and to build a sense of accountability.
“Bi-directional communication between developers and users was seen as key, both to allow adaptations needed to accommodate end users' needs on the ground and to build a sense of accountability that AI developers were listening to end users and respecting their agency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants suggested that if the model drifts, the entire team of technical, clinical, and operational parties should get together to potentially retune the model and continue monitoring and revalidating the model over time.
“They suggested that if the model drifts, the entire team of technical, clinical, and operational parties should get together to potentially retune the model and continue monitoring and revalidating the model over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants suggested that for successful model validation, algorithm developers should collaborate closely with clinical partners.
“The participants suggested that for successful model validation, algorithm developers should collaborate closely with clinical partners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA primary benefit of building AI internally was having full transparency and visibility into the model development process.
“A primary benefit of building AI internally was having full transparency & visibility into the model development process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCybersecurity risk, bias and disparities in care, and unexpected harms to patients were the most prevalent risks that participants identified.
“Cybersecurity risk, bias and disparities in care, and unexpected harms to patients were the most prevalent risks that the participants identified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants recommended centralizing roles and capabilities to think broadly about the optimal use of AI within the organization.
“To enhance efficiencies, participants recommended centralizing roles and capabilities to think broadly about the optimal use of AI within the organization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants suggested giving end users agency and engaging them from early stages of the AI software adoption process.
“Another approach was to give end users agency and engage them from early stages of the AI software adoption process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne challenge raised was how to engage clinicians, particularly end users, as product owners, as they were often stretched between too many responsibilities already.
“One challenge that they raised was how to engage clinicians, particularly end users, as product owners, as they were often stretched between too many responsibilities already.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningMonitoring patient outcomes could address a limitation of technical monitoring when model performance might not be a reliable measure for patients receiving appropriate care.
“For example, monitoring patient outcomes could address a limitation of technical monitoring when model performance might not be a reliable measure for patients receiving appropriate care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn healthcare, the second stage of AI adoption ends with a decision to use the algorithm in patient care.
“The second stage starts with developing an algorithm internally or adapting an externally developed one for internal use and ends with a decision to use the algorithm in patient care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn healthcare, the second stage of AI adoption starts with developing an algorithm internally or adapting an externally developed one for internal use.
“The second stage starts with developing an algorithm internally or adapting an externally developed one for internal use and ends with a decision to use the algorithm in patient care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants recommended conducting user studies and quantitative analyses to understand potential problems to address before deciding on model updates.
“Participants also recommended conducting user studies and quantitative analyses to understand potential problems to address before deciding on model updates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants emphasized the importance of creating new roles dedicated to overseeing operational monitoring.
“Participants also emphasized the importance of creating new roles dedicated to overseeing operational monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn healthcare, the first stage of AI adoption starts with identifying a pain point.
“The first stage starts with identifying a pain point and ends with allocating a budget to pursue an opportunity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants often recommended a centralized group with dedicated resources be accountable for monitoring the AI software.
“Participants often recommended a centralized group with dedicated resources be accountable for monitoring the AI software.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn healthcare, the third stage of AI adoption starts with a rollout of the algorithm, including the associated training, communication, and change management.
“The third stage starts with a rollout of the algorithm, including the associated training, communication, and change management, and ends with a decision to make the algorithm use standard operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants noted that when a serious safety issue is identified, even with little notice, a decision to decommission the model should be made urgently.
“However, they noted that when a serious safety issue is identified, even with little notice, a decision to decommission the model should be made urgently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAlgorithmic brokers working for AI vendors were viewed as playing a more pernicious role.
“Algorithmic brokers working for AI vendors, however, were viewed as playing a more pernicious role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants appreciated that often a model cannot be simply retrained, because the prior clinical integration changed the environment.
“They appreciated that often a model cannot be simply retrained, because the prior clinical integration changed the environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn healthcare, the fourth stage of AI adoption ends with a decision to either continue using the algorithm, update the algorithm, or decommission the algorithm.
“The fourth stage starts with the algorithm used in steady state and ends with a decision to either continue using the algorithm, update the algorithm, or decommission the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants reported that they would consider updating the model when changes in clinical care, intervention outcome, and IT environment were detected.
“The participants reported that they would consider updating the model when changes in clinical care, intervention outcome, and IT environment were detected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThis project is the first multi-organizational collaboration with leaders from a range of major health systems across the United States to investigate organizational governance processes of AI adoption.
“To our knowledge, this project is the first multi-organizational collaboration with leaders from a range of major health systems across the United States to investigate organizational governance processes of AI adoption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn healthcare, the third stage of AI adoption ends with a decision to make the algorithm use standard operations.
“The third stage starts with a rollout of the algorithm, including the associated training, communication, and change management, and ends with a decision to make the algorithm use standard operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that while it would not be practical to constantly have clinicians monitor model performance, periodic review of AI software monitoring and its use was important.
“The participants reported that while it would not be practical to constantly have clinicians monitor model performance, periodic review of AI software monitoring and its use was important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants noted that frequent monitoring would require significant resources, as more models were put into practice.
“They noted that frequent monitoring would require significant resources, as more models were put into practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis articulation work was viewed as essential to success but difficult to fully identify prior to clinical integration.
“This articulation work was viewed as essential to success but difficult to fully identify prior to clinical integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur interviewees underscored the need for evaluation and integration methods that foster calibrated clinician trust, while emphasizing that AI must be viewed as a trustworthy but not infallible source of information.
“Specifically, our interviewees underscored the need for evaluation and integration methods that foster calibrated clinician trust, while emphasizing that AI must be viewed as a trustworthy but not infallible source of information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMonitoring staff satisfaction with the tool would inform why end users might use or not use the tool and identify areas of improvement.
“Monitoring staff satisfaction with the tool would inform why end users might use or not use the tool and identify areas of improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe current research identifies missing resources and suggests that a range of new professionals and practices are considered necessary to produce knowledge that informs the actions taken by clinicians.
“The current research identifies missing resources and suggests that a range of new professionals and practices are considered necessary to produce knowledge that informs the actions taken by clinicians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants proposed that joint accountability between clinical, statistical, and technical providers would be ideal for continued use of the model.
“They proposed that joint accountability between clinical, statistical, and technical providers would be ideal for continued use of the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInterviewees described that the introduction of AI systems may require the creation of new teams to interact with or monitor the system, new communication strategies to maintain professional boundaries, and new expertise.
“Interviewees described that the introduction of AI systems may require the creation of new teams to interact with or monitor the system, new communication strategies to maintain professional boundaries, and new expertise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTo make the monitoring process more feasible, participants suggested the creation of channels for users to report concerns related to the models and potential adverse events.
“To make the monitoring process more feasible, the participants suggested the creation of channels for users where they could report any concerns related to the models and potential adverse events that happen in clinical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, we found that health systems are developing individual institutional practices and principles to guide their process of AI adoption but acknowledge an urgent need for a move towards shared standards.
“Overall, we found that health systems are developing individual institutional practices and principles to guide their process of AI adoption but acknowledge an urgent need for a move towards shared standards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn healthcare, the fourth stage of AI adoption starts with the algorithm used in steady state.
“The fourth stage starts with the algorithm used in steady state and ends with a decision to either continue using the algorithm, update the algorithm, or decommission the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that there was no clear ownership of lifecycle management activities.
“The participants reported that there was no clear ownership of lifecycle management activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that they would consider decommissioning a model if the model performed poorly, when safety concerns emerged, when the model would be replaced by a newly available better model, when there was no value in the clinical use case, and when the model was no longer financially supported.
“Participants reported that they would consider decommissioning a model if the model performed poorly, when safety concerns emerged, when the model would be replaced by a newly available better model, when there was no value in the clinical use case, and when the model was no longer financially supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenOutcomes were measured across various domains, including patient health outcomes, equity in patient care, financial outcomes, and staff satisfaction with the tool.
“Outcomes were measured across various domains, including patient health outcomes, equity in patient care, financial outcomes, and staff satisfaction with the tool.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTo mitigate operational monitoring challenges, participants suggested creating robust documentation standards and governance rubrics for every tool clinically integrated.
“To mitigate these challenges, the participants suggested creating robust documentation standards and governance rubrics for every tool clinically integrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants emphasized that additional monitoring might be required when any updates or unexpected events took place in clinical settings.
“The participants emphasized that additional monitoring might be required when any updates or unexpected events (e.g.implementation of new medical equipment within the relevant workflow) took place in clinical settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn healthcare, the first stage of AI adoption ends with allocating a budget to pursue an opportunity.
“The first stage starts with identifying a pain point and ends with allocating a budget to pursue an opportunity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll participants provided verbal consent to be interviewed and to have anonymized data used in qualitative analyses.
“All participants provided verbal consent to be interviewed and to have anonymized data used in qualitative analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealth systems are increasingly called upon to enhance organizational governance of algorithms, but concrete guidance and capacity building programs are largely missing.
“Health systems are increasingly called upon to enhance organizational governance of algorithms, but concrete guidance and capacity building programs are largely missing [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataData collection was terminated when no new themes or insights emerged (thematic saturation).
“We analyzed data alongside the recruitment and decided to terminate data collection when no new themes or insights emerged (i.e.thematic saturation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTaken together, our findings show how health systems currently make decisions to adopt AI into clinical practice and are in need of shared approaches to governing the process.
“Taken together, our findings show how health systems currently make decisions to adopt AI into clinical practice and are in need of shared approaches to governing the process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenAchieving a healthy governance ecosystem requires a process to align and expand the competencies of the existing actors-regulators and standard setting bodies-in a manner that best furthers the policy goals of safety, efficacy and equity.
“Achieving a healthy governance ecosystem requires a process to align and expand the competencies of the existing actors-regulators and standard setting bodies-in a manner that best furthers the policy goals of safety, efficacy and equity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBurden shifting is inefficient as health systems assessing the same AI products must engage in duplicate work and less well-resourced health systems will be further disadvantaged.
“This burden shifting is wildly inefficient as health systems assessing the same AI products must engage in duplicate work and less well-resourced health systems will be further disadvantaged in their struggle to invest in adequate assessment and validation capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe absence of shared frameworks impedes adoption of AI and undermines safety, efficacy, and equity.
“Not only does the absence of shared frameworks create social and economic costs on individual health systems, but it also impedes adoption of AI and undermines safety, efficacy, and equity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEven better resourced health systems will eventually shift away from engaging with external vendors to prioritize internally developed AI products because it allows them to better assess and manage risk.
“Furthermore, even better resourced health systems will eventually shift away from engaging with external vendors, in order to prioritize internally developed AI products because it allows them to better assess and manage risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping documentation and explanatory artifacts of the AI model and data may build clinician knowledge throughout the integration process.
“Developing documentation and explanatory artifacts of the AI model and data may build clinician knowledge throughout the integration process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHealth system organizations must exchange information, foster dialogue, and contribute best practices that complement and strengthen a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.
“Health system organizations must exchange information, foster dialogue, and contribute best practices that complement and strengthen a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRespecting clinician's agency and expertise may reduce unwarranted skepticism about AI outputs.
“Respecting clinician's agency and expertise may reduce unwarranted skepticism about AI outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenGovernance processes are required at the organizational, not algorithmic, level for analyzing the quality of AI and clinical outcomes produced by socio-technical systems reconfigured by AI.
“Governance processes are required at the organizational, not algorithmic, level for analyzing the quality of AI and clinical outcomes produced by socio-technical systems reconfigured by AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenSuccessfully governing AI requires a detailed understanding of the competencies and capacities of different actors.
“Successfully governing AI requires a detailed understanding of the competencies and capacities of different actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEach health system must develop governance frameworks along with assigning responsibilities to entities with the independence, expertise, and operational capacity.
“As an important building block to produce organizational governance, each health system must develop governance frameworks along with assigning responsibilities to entities with the independence, expertise, and operational capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenOur research identified an immediate opportunity to improve organizational governance of AI in healthcare.
“Our research identified an immediate opportunity to improve organizational governance of AI in healthcare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Healthcare data is messy and may contain bias.
“Given that healthcare data is messy and may contain bias, it was important to perform thorough data quality assurance, even though it required significant resources.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Algorithm developers tend to have limited insight into an existing workflow.
“As algorithm developers tend to have limited insight into an existing workflow, it was critical that end users of the AI software were involved in the process of developing the new workflow and provided context into the current state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Implementation of AI software would create inevitable changes in the existing workflow.
“Given that implementation of the AI software would create inevitable changes in the existing workflow, they also highlighted the importance of recognizing the changes and providing necessary support to front-line workers reconciling these changes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model performance may drift due to changes made in clinical care.
“The participants cautioned that model evaluation may have to change over time, as the model performance may drift due to changes made in clinical care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Staff turnover happens frequently in clinical care.
“Staff turnover, which happens frequently in clinical care, made the fidelity of model adoption particularly challenging, because it required the need for ongoing education and training.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Algorithms are often combined with treatment protocols, follow-up care, and changes in care-team responsibilities.
“Participants described the difficulty measuring the true impact of the AI component of a solution in isolation, because algorithms are often combined with treatment protocols, follow-up care, and changes in care-team responsibilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vendors have a vested interest in positioning their products as not requiring regulatory approval or fitting under discretionary enforcement.
“For example, vendors have a vested interest in positioning their products as not requiring regulatory approval or fitting under discretionary enforcement.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Implementation challenges for AI in clinical use include securing significant investment in funding, building infrastructure, employing skilled personnel, ensuring regulatory compliance, and integration into clinical workflows.
“It entails overcoming implementation challenges, such as securing significant investment in funding, building infrastructure, employing skilled personnel, ensuring regulatory compliance, and integration into clinical workflows14–16.”
From Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
The algorithm journey map is organized around four stages based on related work defining algorithm adoption stages.
“The algorithm journey map is organized around four stages based on related work defining algorithm adoption stages17.”
From The algorithm journey map: a tangible approach to implementing AI solutions in healthcare (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Swiss Cheese Model citation points to a different reference
MinorThe text cites reference [26] for the Swiss Cheese Model of Pandemic Defense, but reference 26 is about fairness in sociotechnical systems. The Swiss Cheese Model appears as reference 25.
“Drawing on the Swiss Cheese Model of Pandemic Defense [26]”
“26. Andrew D Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, and Janet Vertesi. 2019. Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems.”
Cites
Dellit, T. H., Owens, R. C., McGowan, J. E., Gerding, D. N., Weinstein, R. A., Burke, J. P., Huskins, W. C., Paterson, D. L., Fishman, N. O., Carpenter, C. F., et al. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/510393 · Cited by 3,366 · see citing works
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, as indicated earlier, our interviews reported that AI governance requires new resources and expertise beyond current capabilities within health systems that align with the categories of algorithmic curators, brokers, and articulators[15].”
BackgroundFairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287598 · Cited by 1,631 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The focus on the health care delivery ecosystem aligns with the growing emphasis on the understanding that a machine learning model is part of a sociotechnical system, and that the other components of the system need to be modeled[19].”
BackgroundLegal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law
Edelman, L. B. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229939 · Cited by 1,584 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Socio-legal scholars similarly warn that governance in private hands can produce symbolic structures that legitimate the behavior of regulated entities without furthering public policy objectives [7].”
BackgroundShlaes, D. M., Gerding, D. N., John, J. F., Craig, W. A., Bornstein, D. L., Duncan, R. A., Eckman, M. R., Farrer, W. E., Greene, W. H., Lorian, V., et al. (1997) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/513766 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Fishman, N. O., Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America, & Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (2012) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/665010 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Pollack, L. A., & Srinivasan, A. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu542 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Shlaes, D. M., Gerding, D. N., John, J. F., Craig, W. A., Bornstein, D. L., Duncan, R. A., Eckman, M. R., Farrer, W. E., Greene, W. H., Lorian, V., et al. (1997) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.2307/30141215 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Alexander Fleming and the discovery of penicillin
Bennett, J. W., & Chung, K.-T. (2001) · Advances in applied microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(01)49013-7 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
A Path for Translation of Machine Learning Products into Healthcare Delivery
(2020) · EMJ Innovations · doi:10.33590/emjinnov/19-00172 · Cited by 172 · cited 1× · see citing works
“First, we developed an interview guide and identified which types of internal and external roles to interview based on four relatively distinct stages of AI adoption: (1) problem identification and procurement, (2) development and adaptation, (3) clinical integration, and (4) lifecycle management [28] (Table 4 in Appe…”
MethodSelf-citationStudying up: reorienting the study of algorithmic fairness around issues of power
Barabas, C., Doyle, C., Rubinovitz, J. B., & Dinakar, K. (2020) · FAT* · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372859 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“practices,” [2] aligning with recent calls for “studying up” into the details of institutional decision-making as a means of holding powerful actors accountable [3].”
BackgroundPaying for artificial intelligence in medicine
Parikh, R. B., & Helmchen, L. A. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00609-6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Watson, C. J., Whitledge, J. D., Siani, A. M., & Burns, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13181-020-00814-3 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The case for algorithmic stewardship for artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies
Eaneff, S., Obermeyer, Z., & Butte, A. J. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9371 · Cited by 101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Health systems are increasingly called upon to enhance organizational governance of algorithms, but concrete guidance and capacity building programs are largely missing[6].”
BackgroundThe State of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in California
Trivedi, K. K., & Rosenberg, J. B. (2013) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/669876 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Leading Practices in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Conference Summary
Baker, D. W., Hyun, D. Y., Neuhauser, M. M., Bhatt, J., & Srinivasan, A. (2019) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.04.006 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Group Purchasing Organizations, Health Care Costs, and Drug Shortages
Bruhn, W. E., Fracica, E. A., & Makary, M. A. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13604 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“formulary, health systems work with external group purchasing organizations to negotiate rates with the manufacturer and supply the device [5].”
BackgroundTeaching artificial intelligence as a fundamental toolset of medicine
Ötleş, E., James, C. A., Lomis, K. D., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100824 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“And even opportunities for individual clinicians to upskill and participate directly in algorithm development or validation are limited[16].”
BackgroundAddressing the imperative to evolve the hospital new product value analysis process
Engelman, D. T., Boyle, E. M., & Benjamin, E. M. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.057 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“committees to evaluate medical device requests from clinicians and maintain device formularies [13].”
BackgroundBamberger, K. A., & Mulligan, D. K. (2011) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00351.x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationDellit, T. H. (2007) · Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/ipc.0b013e318068b1c0
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- HHS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2014. Medicare and Medicaid programs; regulatory provisions to promote program efficiency, transparency, and burden reduction; Part II. Federal register 79, 91 (2014), 27105–27157.
- US FDA. 2020. Drug Administration (FDA). Changes to existing medical software policies resulting from section 3060 of the 21st Century Cures Act; 2019.
- US Food, Drug Administration, 2022. Advancing health through innovation: new drug therapy approvals 2022.
- Jody Freeman. 2000. The private role in the public governance. NyuL rev. 75 (2000), 543.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Not all AI health tools with regulatory authorization are clinically validated
Fassi, S. C. E., Abdullah, A., Fang, Y., Natarajan, S., Masroor, A. B., Kayali, N., Prakash, S., & Henderson, G. E. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03203-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Callahan, A., McElfresh, D., Banda, J. M., Bunney, G., Char, D., Chen, J., Corbin, C. K., Dash, D., Downing, N. L., Jain, S. S., et al. (2024) · NEJM Catalyst · doi:10.1056/cat.24.0131 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Rethinking clinical trials for medical AI with dynamic deployments of adaptive systems
Rosenthal, J. T., Beecy, A., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01674-3 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“…fi cation, then proceeding to a design phase, followed by model development in the research setting, silent deployment, then deployment to “ production ” setting in the real-world, and fi nally a post-deployment phase of monitoring and making changes or removing from production as needed 8 – 11 .”
Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Kellogg, K. C., Ratliff, W., Murray, S. G., Suresh, H., Valladares, A., Shaw, K., Tobey, D., Vidal, D. E., et al. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000390 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“We interviewed 89 individuals from 10 US healthcare delivery organizations and ecosystem partners [35].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA normative framework for artificial intelligence as a sociotechnical system in healthcare
McCradden, M. D., Joshi, S. D., Anderson, J. A., & London, A. J. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100864 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“8 The intervention ensemble for a given system is not static and should be updated as relevant.”
BackgroundInfluentialA comprehensive review of the Swiss cheese model in risk management
Shabani, T., Jerie, S., & Shabani, T. (2023) · Safety in Extreme Environments · doi:10.1007/s42797-023-00091-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“The use of Swiss Cheese Model as a risk management framework in organizations instil confidence in stakeholders that their interests are being protected (Sheehan et al. 2021; Kim et al. 2023).”
Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada
Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Kueper, J., Tang, T., Hayes, C., Fine, B., Balu, S., & Sendak, M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01909-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“We created an interview guide and asked participants about current governance practices for AI solutions, as well as future governance needs, across four stages of AI lifecycle: (1) procurement, (2) development and adaptation, (3)clinicalintegration,and(4)lifecyclemanagement 15 .”
Self-citationBerman, G., Goyal, N., & Madaio, M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642398 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ong, A. Y., Taribagil, P., Sevgi, M., Kale, A. U., Dow, E. R., Macdonald, T., Kras, A., Maniatopoulos, G., Liu, X., Keane, P. A., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01726-8 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“Published guidelinesforAIaMDimplementationprocessesconsistentlyhighlight initial pre-implementation local evaluations and post-deployment monitoring asbestpractices 37,38 .”
Self-citationKhan, S. D., Hoodbhoy, Z., Raja, M. H. R., Kim, J. Y., Hogg, H. D. J., Manji, A. A. A., Gulamali, F., Hasan, A., Shaikh, A., Tajuddin, S., et al. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationVereschak, O., Alizadeh, F., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2024) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642018 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“They were further reformulated or merged with the consensus of all four authors in the process of writing the paper, and organized, under three main themes: one on the definition of trust, one on the role of interpersonal relations, and one on the divergent opinions between AI practitioners and…”
Nair, M., Nygren, J., Nilsén, P., Gama, F., Neher, M., Larsson, I., & Svedberg, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550459 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology Adoption in Emergency Departments: A Comprehensive Review
Lee, A. T., Ramasamy, R. K., & Subbarao, A. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22040479 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“This finding is further supported by J. Y. Kim et al. (2023) [50], who conducted a study to examine the adoption of AI in healthcare.”
The algorithm journey map: a tangible approach to implementing AI solutions in healthcare
Boag, W., Hasan, A., Kim, J. Y., Revoir, M., Nichols, M., Ratliff, W., Gao, M., Zilberstein, S., Samad, Z., Hoodbhoy, Z., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01061-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“fi ning algorithm adoption stages 17 .”
Self-citationJackson, B. R., Sendak, M., Solomonides, A. E., Balu, S., & Sittig, D. F. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae296 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationVerma, A. A., Trbovich, P., Mamdani, M., & Shojania, K. G. (2023) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015713 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“These considerations align with emerging frameworks for the adoption of ML technologies 26 and are focused on foundational issues, which should remain relevant even as ML technologies evolve and present new opportunities and challenges.”
NLP for Maternal Healthcare: Perspectives and Guiding Principles in the Age of LLMs
Antoniak, M., Naik, A., Alvarado, C. S., Wang, L. L., & Chen, I. Y. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658982 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“On the applied side, as one example, Epic Systems, the leading provider of electronic health record (EHR) systems in the United States, is bringing GPT-4 into EHRs to help clinicians communicate with patients [95].”
BackgroundMonitoring strategies for continuous evaluation of deployed clinical prediction models
Kim, G. Y. E., Corbin, C. K., Grolleau, F., Baiocchi, M., & Chen, J. H. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104854 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Proactive Algorithm Monitoring to Ensure Health Equity
Sendak, M., Balu, S., & Hernandez, A. F. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45022 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationArdito, V., Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., Petracca, F., & Preti, L. M. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251355680 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Eliminating the AI digital divide by building local capacity
Gulamali, F., Kim, J. Y., Pejavara, K., Thomas, C., Mathur, V., Eigen, Z. J., Lifson, M. A., Patel, M. R., Shaw, K., Tobey, D., et al. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001026 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…as HDOs lacking personnel with relevant expertise, resources to purchase and localize tools, organizational processes and capabilities to conduct AI product lifecycle management, and IT infrastructure, including electronic health records (EHRs) will be unable to fully benefit from AI [16].”
Self-citationClinical Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Interventions
Hogg, H. D. J., Martindale, A. P. L., Liu, X., & Denniston, A. K. (2024) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.65.10.10 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“11,13,29 To assess the balance of these costs and benefits for a particular AI-enabled intervention, choices made by researchers about how the AI interacts with clinicians in a study should be justified.”
BackgroundSelf-citationShahid, A., Khatri, N., Azhar, Z., Rauf, T., Ishaq, E. E., Kansal, G., Oduoye, M. O., Adeniji, O. W., & Conteh, J. Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1763884 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…undermines reliability and legal certainty, particularly when it comes to the adoption of such opaque systems in low-resource contexts (26, 27), underscoring the need for robust regulatory frameworks that supersede liability and establish clear care compliance to create transparency (28).”
Sánchez, L. E., Buddenkotte, T., Sa’d, M. A., McCague, C., d’Arcy, J. A., Rundo, L., Samoshkin, A., Graves, M. J., Hollamby, V., Browne, P., et al. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13172813 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The potential of the aforementioned research on AI models for image reconstruction and image analysis is best realised if these are developed, tested and deployed in close collaboration with health care professionals in a clinical setting [6].”
BackgroundGoldstein, B. A., Mohottige, D., Bessias, S., & Cary, M. P. (2024) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.04.008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Alami, H., Pozelli Sabio, R., Pérez, E. J., Gagnon, M.-P., Langlois, L., Denis, J.-L., Malas, K., Rivard, L., Savoldelli, M., Ag Ahmed, M. A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/87448 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Furthermore, Kim et al [55] advocated for organizations’ early identification and mitigation of potential AI-related risks.”
InfluentialHasan, A., Prizant, N. T., Kim, J. Y., Rao, S., Vidal, D. E., Shaw, K., Tobey, D., Valladares, A., Zilberstein, S., Patel, M. R., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01605-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationYagnik, V. D., Choudhary, P. R., & Garg, P. K. (2026) · Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology · doi:10.2147/ceg.s573930 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“84 Finally, future research must extend beyond the technical performance.”
Evaluating Large Language Models in Cardiology: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini
Pierri, M. D., Galeazzi, M., D’Alessio, S., Dottori, M., Capodaglio, I., Corinaldesi, C., Marini, M., & Eusanio, M. D. (2025) · Hearts · doi:10.3390/hearts6030019 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sendak, M., Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., et al. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000513 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationHossain, I., Belal, H. M., Ratul, S. H., & Rahman, M. A. (2026) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-026-00491-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…scholars have already explored various technology adoption in healthcare, such as healthcare professionals’ readiness to adopt telemedicine (Schu¨rmann et al., 2025), EHR adoption in low-income countries (Wolde-mariam & Jimma, 2023), and AI adoption in healthcare organizations (Kim et al., 2023).”
Thiers, F. A., & Harned, Z. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5ks37 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Data Science and Precision Medicine in Oncology
Singh, H. K., Kumaran, S. S., & Dhamija, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4998-3_18 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Invisible AI Infrastructure for Safety-Net Healthcare Organizations
Kim, J. Y., Thomas, C., Kpodzro, S., Hasan, A., Patel, M. R., Balu, S., & Sendak, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812211 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Unlike prior EHR and telehealth technologies, AI systems introduce unique challenges, including the need for local validation, limited transparency, costly and complex maintenance and monitoring, and unclear accountability for downstream impacts across their lifecycle [40].”
Self-citationMake or buy strategy for Machine Learning Operations – MLOps
Nogare, D., Silveira, I. F., BANZAI, R., & ALEXANDRE, M. C. (2025) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202520240924 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Editorial: Governance of emerging health-related technologies
Ibragimova, I., & Phagava, H. (2024) · International Journal of Health Governance · doi:10.1108/ijhg-03-2024-161 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI Institutional Transformation and Challenges for ChangePreprint
Mohamed, E. A. S., & Alamin, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5151354 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shaw, J., Pinel, C., Donia, J., & Hoyweghen, I. V. (2026) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2026.2629332 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Academic health centres and universities have been pivotal in the development and early testing of data-intensive health innovations (Kim et al. 2023), investing intellectual resources and providing ideal testing grounds to explore the utility and sustainability of AI technologies for health…”
Implementing Generative AI in U.S. Hospital Systems
Armstrong, B., Kellogg, K. C., Levi, R., Shah, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2024) · doi:10.21428/e4baedd9.1729053f
Transforming Global Healthcare
Chaudhuri, R. R. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6180-1.ch021
Management of Sustainable and Innovative Projects: the Importance of Planning and Risk Management
Hiranobe, C. T., Hiranobe, M. F., Souza, D. D. S., et al. (2025) · Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · doi:10.7769/gesec.v16i4.4787
“The combination of these technologies provides companies with a comprehensive view of their operating environments and superior capacity to adapt to risks (Kim et al ., 2023; Malhotra et al. , 2022; Birkel & Hartmann, 2020).”
Scenario‐Based Forecasting of ChatGPT's Role as a Research Assistant in Nursing by 2030
Al‐Moteri, M. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70055
RMTrans: Robust Multimodal Transformers for Patient Prognosis under Backdoor Threats
Tang, T., Han, G., Luo, R., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3749989
Ye, X., Zhang, G., Zhu, X., et al. (2025) · Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area International Conference on Digital Economy and Artificial Intelligence (DEAI) · doi:10.1145/3745238.3745452
Calibrating generative AI models for healthcare
Gaur, L., & Abraham, A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33124-4.00003-5
dos Reis, G. F., Barbosa, T. J. S., Pedrosa, L., et al. (2025) · doi:10.5753/erigo.2025.17005
AI Implementation in Safety Net Healthcare: Understanding Barriers and StrategiesPreprint
Thomas, C., Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Kpodzro, S., Cortes, J., Day, B., Jensen, S., L'Huillier, S., Oden, M. O., Segura, S. Z., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.04.07.26350351
Self-citationKim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Ahmed, R., Vladimirova, A., Prakash, A., Alwakeel, M., Jha, V., Patel, M. R., Mitchley, M., Theiler, E., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6647418
Self-citationAnusi, H. I. (2026) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.4953
“Some of the ' contemporary debates' in the U.S. focus on issues arising from such fast diffusion: vendor concentration, interoperability bottlenecks, and the governance of the AI tools which are integrated into EHR ecosystems (Cho, 2025; Kim et al., 2023; Storey & Soshnikov, 2023).”
A capability centric framework for delivering human centred AI services in healthcare
Atariani, M. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01572-x
“Additional relevant work was identified through backward and forward citation chaining, particularly in areas such as radiology workflows and emergency department triage [13–15].”
InfluentialYi, H., Xian, L., Zhang, Y., Zeng, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812239
How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole
Savage, S., Nava, J., Zhou, W., & Lee, H. (2026) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812258
Medicine in an Age of Sourcery: AI and the Prophetic Logic of Prediction
Furiasse, A. (2026) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10912-026-10046-1
Integrating Generative AI Into Organizational Workflows: Evidence From Practitioner Reports
Hasavari, S., & Zaveri, J. S. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70144
Katzorke, A., Dober, F., Floerecke, S., Herzfeldt, A., & Ertl, C. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9807417/v1
- Authors
- Kim, J. Y., Boag, W., Gulamali, F., Hasan, A., Hogg, H. D. J., Lifson, M., Mulligan, D., Patel, M., Raji, I. D., Sehgal, A., Shaw, K., Tobey, D., Valladares, A., Vidal, D., Balu, S., & Sendak, M.
- Affiliations
- Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Defense Logistics Agency (US)
- Community Representative, USA
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-06-12
- Pages
- 1396-1417
- OpenAlex
- W4380320756
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (10849)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- AI governance, artificial intelligence adoption, health care, organizational governance, institutional adoption, AI ethics, decision points, usability testing, responsible AI adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review