Cited by 14Impact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Tricky vs. Transparent: Towards an Ecologically Valid and Safe Approach for Evaluating Online Safety Nudges for Teens

Agha, Zainab, Park, Jinkyung, Wan, Ruyuan, Ali, Naima Samreen, Wang, Yiwei, Difranzo, Dominic, Badillo-Urquiola, Karla, Wisniewski, Pamela J.·2024·Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

HCI research has been at the forefront of designing interventions for protecting teens online; yet, how can we test and evaluate these solutions without endangering the youth we aim to protect? Towards this goal, we conducted focus groups with 20 teens to inform the design of a social media simulation platform and study for evaluating online safety nudges co-designed with teens. Participants evaluated risk scenarios, personas, platform features, and our research design to provide insight regarding the ecological validity of these artifacts. Teens expected risk scenarios to be subtle and tricky, while also higher in risk to be believable. The teens iterated on the nudges to prioritize risk prevention without reducing autonomy, risk coping, and community accountability. For the simulation, teens recommended using transparency with some deceit to balance realism and respect for participants. Our meta-level research provides a teen-centered action plan to evaluate online safety interventions safely and effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613904.3642313

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agha, Z., Park, J., Wan, R., Ali, N. S., Wang, Y., Difranzo, D., Badillo-Urquiola, K., & Wisniewski, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, United States
Venue
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
Pages
1-20
OpenAlex
W4396832692
Cited by
13
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
17.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-2333207)
  • William T Grant Foundation (187941)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
adolescents, ecological validity, risk scenarios, research transparency, youth autonomy, risk prevention, risk coping, community accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review