Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dataset for Research on Water Sustainability

Gupta, Pranjol Sen, Hossen, Md Rajib, Li, Pengfei, Ren, Shaolei, Islam, Mohammad A.·2024·The 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems

Abstract

Freshwater scarcity is a global problem that requires collective efforts across all industry sectors. Nevertheless, a lack of access to operational water footprint data bars many applications from exploring optimization opportunities hidden within the temporal and spatial variations. To break this barrier into research in water sustainability, we build a dataset for operation direct water usage in the cooling systems and indirect water embedded in electricity generation. Our dataset consists of the hourly water efficiency of major U.S. cities and states from 2019 to 2023. We also offer cooling system models that capture the impact of weather on water efficiency. We present a preliminary analysis of our dataset and discuss three potential applications that can benefit from it. Our dataset is publicly available at Open Science Framework (OSF) [1].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3632775.3661962

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Cooling system with evaporative cooling.
Figure 2 Cooling system with evaporative cooling.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 (a) Change in WUE with wet bulb temperatures with different approaches (i.e., the difference between cold water temperature and wet bulb temperature). (b) Model of weather impact on direct WUE. For the "Fixed Approach" model, the approach is set at 5 ◦ F. For the "Fixed Cold Water" temperature model, cold water temperature is set at 85 ◦ F.
Figure 3 (a) Change in WUE with wet bulb temperatures with different approaches (i.e., the difference between cold water temperature and wet bulb temperature). (b) Model of weather impact on direct WUE. For the "Fixed Approach" model, the approach is set at 5 ◦ F. For the "Fixed Cold Water" temperature model, cold water temperature is set at 85 ◦ F.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Water efficiency across different U.S. locations in 2023.
Figure 4 Water efficiency across different U.S. locations in 2023.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Average WUE across different locations.
Figure 5 Average WUE across different locations.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Daily change in WUE.
Figure 6 Daily change in WUE.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [4] Palm Beach Daily News, “Drought dilemma: Palm Beach leaders struggle to cap water use,” https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/weather/2011/06/09/water-managers-shortage-near-crisis/7179447007/.
  2. [6] Google, “Environmental report,” 2023, https://sustainability.google/reports/.
  3. [12] M. A. Islam, K. Ahmed, H. Xu, N. H. Tran, G. Quan, and S. Ren, “Exploiting spatio-temporal diversity for water saving in geo-distributed data centers,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 734–746, 2016.
  4. [14] P. Reig, “What’s the difference between water use and water consumption?,” World Resources Institute Commentary, 2013, https://www.wri.org/insights/whats-difference-between-water-use-and-water-consumption.
  5. [15] J. Macknick R. Newmark G. Heath and K. Hallett “A review of operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies ” NREL Tech. Report: NREL/TP-6A20-50900 2011. · DOI · Paper page
  6. [16] G. G. Protocol, “Greenhouse gas protocol,” Sector Toolsets for Iron and Steel-Guidance Document, 2011.

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, P. S., Hossen, M. R., Li, P., Ren, S., & Islam, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, USA
  • Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, United States of America
  • Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, USA
  • Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, United States of America
  • Computer Sciencd and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, United States of America
Venue
The 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-31
Pages
442-446
Cited by
13
References
8
Funders
National Science Foundation (2152357, 2324915, 2324916)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.