Cited by 14Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingCloud Computing and Resource Management

A Water Efficiency Dataset for African Data Centers

Open access
Shumba, Noah, Tshekiso, Opelo, Li, Pengfei, Fanti, Giulia, Ren, Shaolei·2025·Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) computing and data centers consume large amounts of freshwater, both directly for cooling and indirectly for electricity generation. While most attention has been paid to developed countries such as the U.S., this paper presents the first-of-its-kind dataset that combines nation-level weather and electricity generation data to estimate water usage effectiveness for data centers in 41 African countries across five different climate regions. We also use our dataset to evaluate and estimate the water consumption of inference on two large language models (i.e., Llama-3-70B and GPT-4) in 11 selected African countries. Our estimates suggest that writing a 10-page report using Llama-3-70B could consume as much as {0.66 liters} of water, while the water consumption by GPT-4 for the same task may go up to about {59 liters}. For writing a medium-length email of 120-200 words, Llama-3-70B and GPT-4 could consume about {0.13 liters} and {2.9 liters} of water, respectively. All the numbers for generative model inference tasks are based on public information available in 2024, when we initially prepared the analysis. Since then, AI inference systems have improved substantially. For example, recent disclosures suggest that energy efficiency improved by more than 30x between May 2024 and May 2025. Accordingly, our 2024 estimates should be interpreted as historical reference values rather than as representative of current performance. Interestingly, given the same AI model, 9 of the 11 selected African countries consume less water than the global average, mainly because of lower water intensities for electricity generation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3715335.3735483

Cites

13 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some subsequent models like GPT-4 could consume substantially more energy and water than GPT-3 for processing the same request, especially under the reasoning mode.

    “some subsequent models like GPT-4 could consume substantially more energy and water than GPT-3 for processing the same request, especially under the reasoning mode.3,26”

    From Making AI Less 'Thirsty' (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract (p. 1) and §4.1 (p. 5) estimate substantially greater water and energy use for GPT-4 than for Llama-3-70B on the same writing tasks. They do not compare GPT-4 with GPT-3 or evaluate reasoning mode, so those parts of the claim are unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [5][5] Kishwar Ahmed, Mohammad A Islam, Shaolei Ren, and Gang Quan. 2014. Can Data Center Become Water { Self-Sufficient } ?. In 6th Workshop on Power-Aware Computing and Systems (HotPower 14) . -
  2. [8][8] Cooper Elsworth et al. 2025. Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google Scale. CoRR abs/2508.15734 (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2508.15734 - · DOI
  3. [24][24] Pengfei Li, Jianyi Yang, Mohammad A. Islam, and Shaolei Ren. 2024 (accepted). Making AI Less 'Thirsty': Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models. Commun. ACM (2024 (accepted)). -
  4. [25][25] Tianyi Luo, Robert Young, and Paul Reig. 2015. Aqueduct projected water stress country rankings. Technical Note 16 (2015), 1-16. -
  5. [27][27] Mesfin M Mekonnen, PW Gerbens-Leenes, and Arjen Y Hoekstra. 2015. The water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrology and Earth System 27. Sciences 19, 5 (2015), 2091-2101. doi:10.5194/hess-19-2091-2015 - · DOI
  6. [41][41] Noah Shumba, Opelo Tshekiso, Pengfei Li, Giulia Fanti, and Shaolei Ren. 2024. A Water Efficiency Dataset for African Data Centers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412. 03716 -
  7. [43][43] Siemens. 2018. Completion of world's largest combined cycle power plants in record time. https://press.siemens.com/global/en/feature/completion-worldslargest-combined-cycle-power-plants-record-time. Egypt 14.4 GW CCGT megaproject. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shumba, N., Tshekiso, O., Li, P., Fanti, G., & Ren, S.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University Africa (RW)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-07-21
Pages
453-460
OpenAlex
W4413061419
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
21.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
water efficiency, data centers, water consumption, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review