Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Harassment in Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review

Dong, Jiong, Lu, Yijun, Wu, Shuai, Ma, Yuyin, Ping, Yuan, Liu, Jiang, Washizaki, Hironori·2026·Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

This systematic review examines harassment in virtual reality (VR), synthesizing findings from 85 studies published between 2017 and 2025. We propose a nuanced typology of harassment, encompassing spatial intrusion, sexual and verbal abuse, identity-based discrimination, group-targeted harassment, and systemic harms, and demonstrate how VR’s immersive and embodied features amplify risk and impact. Marginalized users, such as women, LGBTQ+ individuals, children, and people with disabilities, face disproportionate harm. We further analyze the psychological and behavioral consequences of harassment, as well as the effectiveness and limitations of current governance, design, and AI-driven interventions. Our review identifies persistent research gaps in theory, measurement, and inclusive protection, and advocates for ethical, participatory, and preventive approaches to platform safety. This work aims to guide researchers and designers in building more equitable and safe VR environments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3772318.3791728

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dong et al. (2026) found that LGBTQ+ individuals were among the marginalized groups facing disproportionate harm in VR spaces.

    “Critically, the review found that LGBTQ+ individuals were among the marginalized groups facing disproportionate harm in VR spaces, and that the embodied, immersive nature of VR means that identity-based harassment can feel more viscerally threatening than equivalent experiences in text-based online environments.”
  • The embodied, immersive nature of VR means that identity-based harassment can feel more viscerally threatening than equivalent experiences in text-based online environments.

    “Critically, the review found that LGBTQ+ individuals were among the marginalized groups facing disproportionate harm in VR spaces, and that the embodied, immersive nature of VR means that identity-based harassment can feel more viscerally threatening than equivalent experiences in text-based online environments.”
  • Dong et al. (2026) report psychological and physiological reactions to VR harassment including panic, shame, and dissociation.

    “Dong et al. (2026) report psychological and physiological reactions to VR harassment including panic, shame, and dissociation.”
  • Dong et al. (2026) synthesized findings from 85 studies published between 2017 and 2025, identifying a typology of VR harassment that includes spatial intrusion, verbal and sexual abuse, identity-based discrimination, and group-targeted attacks.

    “In a comprehensive systematic review of harassment in virtual reality environments, Dong et al. (2026) synthesized findings from 85 studies published between 2017 and 2025, identifying a typology of VR harassment that includes spatial intrusion, verbal and sexual abuse, identity-based discrimination, and group-targeted attacks.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. SB Abhinaya, Aafaq Sabir, and Anupam Das. 2024. Enabling Developers, Protecting Users: Investigating Harassment and Safety in { VR}. In 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24). 6561–6578.
  2. ACM. 2004. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org. Accessed: 2025-08-15.
  3. Devon Adams, Alseny Bah, Catherine Barwulor, Nureli Musaby, Kadeem Pitkin, and Elissa M Redmiles. 2018. Ethics emerging: the story of privacy and security perceptions in virtual reality. In Fourteenth symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS 2018). 427–442.
  4. Mousa Al-Kfairy Saed Alrabaee Omar Alfandi Amr Taha Mohamed and Souheil Khaddaj. 2025. Navigating ethical dimensions in the metaverse: Challenges frameworks and solutions. IEEE Access (2025). · DOI
  5. Moya Kate Baldry Jassim Happa Anthony Steed Simon Smith and Mashhuda Glencross. 2024. From Embodied Abuse to Mass Disruption: Generative Inter-Reality Threats in Social Mixed-Reality Platforms. Digital Threats: Research and Practice 5 4 (2024) 1–36. · DOI
  6. Sudhanshu Bhatt and Anand Jhawar. 2025. Navigating the dark side of metaverse adoption in healthcare: ethical challenges risks and strategic interventions. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing (2025). · DOI
  7. Lindsay Blackwell Nicole Ellison Natasha Elliott-Deflo and Raz Schwartz. 2019. Harassment in social virtual reality: Challenges for platform governance. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3 CSCW (2019) 1–25. · DOI
  8. 10.1109/VR.2019.8798165 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00222 · DOI
  10. Mohamed Chawki Subhajit Basu and Kyung-Shick Choi. 2024. Redefining boundaries in the metaverse: Navigating the challenges of virtual harm and user safety. Laws 13 3 (2024) 33. · DOI
  11. 10.1145/3706598.3714244 · DOI
  12. Qijia Chen Jie Cai and Giulio Jacucci. 2024. “people are way too obsessed with rank”: Trust system in social virtual reality. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 33 4 (2024) 925–957. · DOI
  13. Qijia Chen Seyed Mahed Mousavi Giuseppe Riccardi and Giulio Jacucci. 2025. Investigating the Use and Perception of Blocking Feature in Social Virtual Reality Spaces: A Study on Discussion Forums. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9 2 (2025) 1–19. · DOI
  14. 10.1145/3706598.3713577 · DOI
  15. Kyung-Shick Choi Whitney Sanders and Claire Seungeun Lee. 2024. The present and future of child sexual abuse on the metaverse: recommendations for an innovative approach to law enforcement responses. Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research 16 4 (2024) 316–329. · DOI
  16. Nichola Copson and Shane D Johnson. 2025. A scoping review of metaverse-facilitated child sexual abuse. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 12 (2025) 101667. · DOI
  17. Elmira Deldari, Diana Freed, Julio Poveda, and Yaxing Yao. 2023. An investigation of teenager experiences in social virtual reality from teenagers’, parents’, and bystanders’ perspectives. In Nineteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2023). 1–17.
  18. Jiong Dong Kaoru Ota and Mianxiong Dong. 2022. Why vr games sickness? an empirical study of capturing and analyzing vr games head movement dataset. IEEE MultiMedia 29 2 (2022) 74–82. · DOI
  19. Jiong Dong Kaoru Ota and Mianxiong Dong. 2024. Exploring avatar experiences in social VR: A comprehensive analysis of user reviews. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 13 3 (2024) 53–60. · DOI
  20. Jiong Dong Kaoru Ota and Mianxiong Dong. 2024. User experience of different groups in social vr applications: An empirical study based on user reviews. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2024). · DOI
  21. Yogesh K Dwivedi Nir Kshetri Laurie Hughes Nripendra P Rana Abdullah M Baabdullah Arpan Kumar Kar Alex Koohang Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete Nina Belei Janarthanan Balakrishnan et al. 2023. Exploring the darkverse: A multi-perspective analysis of the negative societal impacts of the metaverse. Information systems frontiers 25 5 (2023) 2071–2114. · DOI
  22. 10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_1 · DOI
  23. Somaya Eltanbouly Osama Halabi and Junaid Qadir. 2025. Avatar privacy challenges in the metaverse: A comprehensive review and future directions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 41 4 (2025) 1967–1984. · DOI
  24. 10.1145/3613904.3642144 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/3544549.3585840 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/3585088.3589374 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/3713043.3728850 · DOI
  28. Cristina Fiani Pejman Saeghe Mark McGill and Mohamed Khamis. 2024. Exploring the perspectives of social vr-aware non-parent adults and parents on children’s use of social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 CSCW1 (2024) 1–25. · DOI
  29. Guo Freeman and Dane Acena. 2022. " Acting Out" Queer Identity: The Embodied Visibility in Social Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 6 CSCW2 (2022) 1–32. · DOI
  30. 10.1145/3678884.3681865 · DOI
  31. Guo Freeman Lingyuan Li and Kelsea Schulenberg. 2025. " I Have Abused Someone Who Abused Me": Understanding People Who Have Experienced Both Sides of Harassment Accusations in Social VR. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9 2 (2025) 1–26. · DOI
  32. 10.1145/3491102.3502082 · DOI
  33. 10.1145/3706598.3713473 · DOI
  34. Guo Freeman Samaneh Zamanifard Divine Maloney and Dane Acena. 2022. Disturbing the peace: Experiencing and mitigating emerging harassment in social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 CSCW1 (2022) 1–30. · DOI
  35. Google. 2004. Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/. Accessed: 2025-08-15.
  36. Joe Hasei Yosuke Matsumoto Hiroki Kawai Yuko Okahisa Manabu Takaki and Toshifumi Ozaki. 2025. Metaverse Support Groups for LGBTQ+ Youth: An Observational Study on Safety Self-Expression and Early Intervention. Journal of Metaverse 5 2 (2025) 156–167. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Emmie Hine Isadora Neroni Rezende Huw Roberts David Wong Mariarosaria Taddeo and Luciano Floridi. 2024. Safety and privacy in immersive extended reality: An analysis and policy recommendations. Digital Society 3 2 (2024) 33. · DOI
  38. 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00077 · DOI
  39. 10.1145/3706598.3713561 · DOI
  40. IEEE. 2004. IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org. Accessed: 2025-08-15.
  41. Javzmaa Jadamba and Dongjing Kang. 2025. “There I was being virtually groped”: Explore psychological ownership and the framing of sexual harassment in the immersive virtual reality space. Computers in Human Behavior 165 (2025) 108559. · DOI
  42. 10.1145/3628516.3655804 · DOI
  43. 10.1145/3544549.3585911 · DOI
  44. Sibylle Kunz, Claudia Hess, and Adrienne Steffen. 2025. It’s NOT" Only a Game"! Strategies Against Sexual Harassment in Immersive VR Environments. In International Conference on Gender Research , Vol. 8. Academic Conferences International Limited, 500–503.
  45. 10.1145/3491102.3517451 · DOI
  46. 10.1145/3544548.3581530 · DOI
  47. Zhehui Liao Hanwen Zhao Ayush Kulkarni Shaan Singh Chattrath and Amy X Zhang. 2025. Building Proactive and Instant-Reactive Safety Designs to Address Harassment in Social Virtual Reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2504.05781 (2025). · arXiv
  48. 10.1109/ISMAR62088.2024.00027 · DOI
  49. Yijun Lu Kaoru Ota and Mianxiong Dong. 2024. An empirical study of VR Head-mounted displays based on VR games Reviews. ACM Games: Research and Practice 2 3 (2024) 1–20. · DOI
  50. 10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00075 · DOI
  51. 10.1145/3410404.3414268 · DOI
  52. 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00056 · DOI
  53. 10.1145/3459990.3460703 · DOI
  54. Divine Maloney Guo Freeman and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2020. " Talking without a voice" understanding non-verbal communication in social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 4 CSCW2 (2020) 1–25. · DOI
  55. Mangina and Eleni. 2021. White Paper-The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Extended Reality (XR) Report–Social and Multi-User Spaces in VR: Trolling Harassment and Online Safety. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Extended Reality (XR) Report–Social and Multi-User Spaces in VR: Trolling Harassment and Online Safety (2021) 1–17.
  56. T Manju Magesh S Padmavathi and Durairaj. 2023. Increasing the social interaction of autism child using virtual reality intervention (VRI). ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing (2023). · DOI
  57. Andreas Marougkas Christos Troussas Akrivi Krouska and Cleo Sgouropoulou. 2023. Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics 12 13 (2023) 2832. · DOI
  58. 10.1145/3656650.3656702 · DOI
  59. Verity McIntosh and Catherine Allen. 2024. What do policymakers need to know about harassment in the metaverse? Frontiers in Virtual Reality 5 (2024) 1443384. · DOI
  60. 10.1145/3290605.3300794 · DOI
  61. 10.1145/3197391.3205451 · DOI
  62. Giulia Melis and Merylin Monaro. 2025. Sexual Crimes in Metaverse: New Frontiers in Forensic Psychology and Legal Challenges. Journal of Metaverse 5 2 (2025) 124–131. · DOI
  63. Solène Neyret Xavi Navarro Alejandro Beacco Ramon Oliva Pierre Bourdin Jose Valenzuela Itxaso Barberia and Mel Slater. 2020. An embodied perspective as a victim of sexual harassment in virtual reality reduces action conformity in a later milgram obedience scenario. Scientific reports 10 1 (2020) 6207. · DOI
  64. 10.1145/3626705.3627780 · DOI
  65. 10.1145/3584931.3607502 · DOI
  66. Carolyn M Porta Ellen A Frerich Sarah Hoffman Sara Bauer Vedushi M Jain and Cynthia Bradley. 2024. Sexual violence in virtual reality: a scoping review. Journal of forensic nursing 20 1 (2024) 66–77. · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1109/VR58804.2024.00057 · DOI
  68. Mario A Rojas-Sánchez Pedro R Palos-Sánchez and José A Folgado-Fernández. 2023. Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies 28 1 (2023) 155–192. · DOI
  69. 10.1145/3544548.3581329 · DOI
  70. Niloofar Sayadi and Diego Gómez-Zará. 2024. Fostering Inclusive Virtual Reality Environments: Discussing Strategies for Promoting Group Dynamics and Mitigating Harassment. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2405.05917 (2024). · arXiv
  71. Kelsea Schulenberg Guo Freeman Lingyuan Li and Catherine Barwulor. 2023. " Creepy Towards My Avatar Body Creepy Towards My Body": How Women Experience and Manage Harassment Risks in Social Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7 CSCW2 (2023) 1–29. · DOI
  72. Kelsea Schulenberg Guo Freeman Lingyuan Li and Bart Piet Knijnenburg. 2024. Does who you are or appear to be matter?: Understanding identity-based harassment in social VR through the lens of (mis) perceived identity revelation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 CSCW2 (2024) 1–40. · DOI
  73. 10.1145/3544548.3581090 · DOI
  74. Kelsea Schulenberg Lingyuan Li Caitlin Lancaster Douglas Zytko and Guo Freeman. 2023. " We Don’t Want a Bird Cage We Want Guardrails": Understanding & Designing for Preventing Interpersonal Harm in Social VR through the Lens of Consent. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7 CSCW2 (2023) 1–30. · DOI
  75. Mattea Sim Basia Radka Emi Yoshikawa Franziska Roesner Kurt Hugenberg and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2025. To Reveal or Conceal: Privacy and Marginalization in Avatars. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2025). · DOI
  76. Navneet Kumar Singh Rajeev Kumar Ray Nikee Silayach Devi Prasad Dash and Amit Singh. 2025. Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces. Computers in Human Behavior 163 (2025) 108500. · DOI
  77. Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364 1535 (2009) 3549–3557. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Martin Sonntag Julian Schuir Jens Mehmann and Frank Teuteberg. 2025. Customer service ethics in the metaverse: A value-sensitive design science approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 41 1 (2025) 254–270. · DOI
  79. 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00052 · DOI
  80. Bianca Steffes Anna Zichler Simone Salemi and Tim Schneider. 2025. Impact and Consequences of Sexual Offences in the Metaverse Using the Example of Virtual Rape. Deviant Behavior (2025) 1–16. · DOI
  81. 10.1109/VRW66409.2025.00043 · DOI
  82. 10.1109/VR58804.2024.00033 · DOI
  83. Xueyang Wang Kewen Peng Chonghao Hao Wendi Yu Xin Yi and Hewu Li. 2025. VR Whispering: A Multisensory Approach for Private Conversations in Social Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2025). · DOI
  84. Xuetong Wang Ziyan Wang Mingmin Zhang Kangyou Yu Pan Hui and Mingming Fan. 2024. Avatar Appearance and Behavior of Potential Harassers Affect Users’ Perceptions and Response Strategies in Social Virtual Reality (VR): A Mixed-Methods Study. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 CSCW2 (2024) 1–27. · DOI
  85. Maheshya Weerasinghe Shaun Macdonald Cristina Fiani Joseph O’Hagan Mathieu Chollet Mark McGill and Mohamed Khamis. 2025. Beyond mute and block: adoption and effectiveness of safety tools in social VR from ubiquitous harassment to social sculpting. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2025). · DOI
  86. Brenda K Wiederhold. 2022. Sexual harassment in the metaverse. 479–480 pages. · DOI
  87. 10.1177/1071181321651094 · DOI
  88. Yiwen Xu Qinyang Hou Hongyu Wan and Mirjana Prpa. 2024. Safe guard: an llm-agent for real-time voice-based hate speech detection in social virtual reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:https://arXiv.org/abs/2409.15623 (2024). · arXiv
  89. Samaneh Zamanifard and Guo Freeman. 2019. " The togetherness that we crave" experiencing social VR in long distance relationships. In Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 438–442.
  90. 10.1109/ICCC62609.2024.10942157 · DOI
  91. 10.1145/3597638.3608388 · DOI
  92. 10.1145/3706598.3714230 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Qingxiao Zheng Shengyang Xu Lingqing Wang Yiliu Tang Rohan C Salvi Guo Freeman and Yun Huang. 2023. Understanding safety risks and safety design in social VR environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7 CSCW1 (2023) 1–37. · DOI
  94. Douglas Zytko and Jonathan Chan. 2023. The dating metaverse: Why we need to design for consent in social vr. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29 5 (2023) 2489–2498. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dong, J., Lu, Y., Wu, S., Ma, Y., Ping, Y., Liu, J., & Washizaki, H.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2026-04-13
Pages
1-21
Cited by
1
References
1
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (252300420984)
  • Key Scientific Research Project Plan of Henan Provincial Colleges and Universities (25B520018)
  • JST BOOST, Japan (JPMJBS2429)
  • Basic Research Funds of Universities in the Autonomous Region (202512120001)
  • General Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (202512120011)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review