Cited by 1Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Sandbox for Deep Research

Open access
Coelho, João, Ning, Jingjie, He, Jingyuan, Mao, Kangrui, Paladugu, Abhijay Sai, Setlur, Pranav, Jin, Jiahe, Callan, Jamie +3 more·2026·Proceedings of the 2026 International ACM SIGIR Conference on Innovative Concepts and Theories in Information Retrieval (ICTIR)

Abstract

Deep research systems represent an emerging class of agentic information retrieval methods that generate comprehensive and well-supported reports to complex queries, and/or answers to hard-to-locate factual questions. However, most existing systems rely on dynamic commercial search APIs, which pose reproducibility and transparency challenges, in addition to high costs. To address these limitations, we introduce DeepResearchGym as a free and open-source search sandbox for reproducible research on deep research systems. The sandbox provides a search API that indexes large-scale public web corpora, namely ClueWeb22 and FineWeb, using a state-of-the-art dense retriever and approximate nearest neighbor search via DiskANN. It achieves comparable latency to popular commercial APIs while ensuring stable document rankings across runs. We demonstrate the sandbox's utility through two use cases. For training, we synthesize queries grounded in the indexed corpora and show that search agents trained within the sandbox generalize to commercial search at inference time, enabling cost-effective reinforcement learning. For evaluation, we extend the Researchy Questions benchmark with LLM-as-a-judge metrics to measure alignment with users' information needs, retrieval faithfulness, and report quality. Evaluation results show that system rankings remain consistent when switching from commercial APIs to ours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3805713.3820409

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Parishad BehnamGhader, Vaibhav Adlakha, Marius Mosbach, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Nicolas Chapados, and Siva Reddy. 2024. LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders. In Conference on Language Modeling, COLM.
  2. Shengding Hu et al., 2024. MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategies. In Conference on Language Modeling, COLM.
  3. Satyapriya Krishna, Kalpesh Krishna, Anhad Mohananey, Steven Schwarcz, Adam Stambler, Shyam Upadhyay, and Manaal Faruqui. 2025. Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation. In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL.
  4. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS.
  5. Grégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun, and Thomas Scialom. 2024. GAIA: A Benchmark for General AI Assistants. In International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR.
  6. Niklas Muennighoff. 2022. SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Search. ArXiv abs/2202.08904. · arXiv
  7. Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Shrey Pandit, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Austin Xu, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong, and Shafiq Joty. 2025. SFR-DeepResearch: Towards Effective Reinforcement Learning for Autonomously Reasoning Single Agent. ArXiv abs/2509.06283. · arXiv
  8. Jingjie Ning, João Coelho, Yibo Kong, Yunfan Long, Bruno Martins, João Magalhães, Jamie Callan, and Chenyan Xiong. 2026. Agentic Search in the Wild: Intents and Trajectory Dynamics from 14M Real Search Requests. In International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR.
  9. OpenAI. 2025. Introducing Deep Research. https://openai.com/index/introducing-deep-research/ OpenAI Blog. May 11, 2025.
  10. Zehan Qi Rongwu Xu Zhijiang Guo Cunxiang Wang Hao Zhang and Wei Xu. 2024. LONG(^2)RAG: Evaluating Long-Context & Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Key Point Recall. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics EMNLP.
  11. Rishiraj Saha Roy, Smith Agarwal, Niloy Ganguly, and Monojit Choudhury. 2016. Syntactic Complexity of Web Search Queries through the Lenses of Language Models, Networks and Users. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 52, 5 (2016).
  12. Dongyu Ru, Lin Qiu, Xiangkun Hu, Tianhang Zhang, Peng Shi, Shuaichen Chang, Cheng Jiayang, Cunxiang Wang, Shichao Sun, Huanyu Li, Zizhao Zhang, Binjie Wang, Jiarong Jiang, Tong He, Zhiguo Wang, Pengfei Liu, Yue Zhang, and Zheng Zhang. 2024. RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation. In Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS.
  13. Serper. 2025. Serper.dev Search API. https://serper.dev Accessed May 11, 2025.
  14. Dingfeng Shi, Jingyi Cao, Qianben Chen, Weichen Sun, Weizhen Li, Hongxuan Lu, Fangchen Dong, Tianrui Qin, King Zhu, Minghao Liu, Jian Yang, Ge Zhang, Jiaheng Liu, Changwang Zhang, Jun Wang, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, and Wangchunshu Zhou. 2025. TaskCraft: Automated Generation of Agentic Tasks. ArXiv abs/2506.10055. · arXiv
  15. Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Yingqian Min, Jie Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Lei Fang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2025. R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning. ArXiv abs/2503.05592. · arXiv
  16. Suhas Jayaram Subramanya, Devvrit, Harsha Vardhan Simhadri, Ravishankar Krishnaswamy, and Rohan Kadekodi. 2019. DiskANN: Fast Accurate Billion-point Nearest Neighbor Search on a Single Node. In Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS.
  17. Tavily. 2025. Tavily Search API. https://tavily.com Accessed May 11, 2025.
  18. Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Abhishek Srivastava, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021. BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. In Conference on Neural Information Processing System, NeurIPS.
  19. Lei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, Yunshi Lan, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, and Ee-Peng Lim. 2023. Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL.
  20. Jialong Wu, Wenbiao Yin, Yong Jiang, Zhenglin Wang, Zekun Xi, Runnan Fang, Linhai Zhang, Yulan He, Deyu Zhou, Pengjun Xie, and Fei Huang. 2025. WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL.
  21. Fangyuan Xu, Yixiao Song, Mohit Iyyer, and Eunsol Choi. 2023. A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answering. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL.
  22. Yujia Zhou, Yan Liu, Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Hongjin Qian, Zheng Liu, Chaozhuo Li, Zhicheng Dou, Tsung-Yi Ho, and Philip S. Yu. 2024. Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey. ArXiv abs/2409.10102. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coelho, J., Ning, J., He, J., Mao, K., Paladugu, A. S., Setlur, P., Jin, J., Callan, J., Magalhães, J., Martins, B., & Xiong, C.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Laboratório para a Ciência da Computação e Informática (PT)
  • Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2026 International ACM SIGIR Conference on Innovative Concepts and Theories in Information Retrieval (ICTIR)
Publisher
ACM
Published
2026-07-24
Pages
34-43
OpenAlex
W7168300957
Cited by
0
References
29
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Open access
Funders
  • Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (645008882-00000055)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT) (UID\/50021\/2025, UID\/PRR\/50021\/2025)
  • CMU Portugal Program (PRT\/BD\/153683\/2021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
reproducibility, dense retrieval, approximate nearest neighbor search, query synthesis, LLM-as-a-judge, reporting quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review