The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practical multi-candidate election system
Open accessAbstract
The aim of electronic voting schemes is to provide a set of protocols that allow voters to cast ballots while a group of authorities collect the votes and output the final tally. In this paper we describe a practical multi-candidate election scheme that guarantees privacy of voters, public verifiability, and robustness against a coalition of malicious authorities. Furthermore, we address the problem of receipt-freeness and incoercibility of voters. Our new scheme is based on the Paillier cryptosystem and on some related zero-knowledge proof techniques. The voting schemes are very practical and can be efficiently implemented in a real system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms
Chaum, D. L. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358549.358563 · Cited by 4,289
How To Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems
Fiat, A., & Shamir, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47721-7_12 · Cited by 3,943
Efficient signature generation by smart cards
Schnorr, C. P. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196725 · Cited by 2,787
Security Proofs for Signature Schemes
Pointcheval, D., & Stern, J. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-68339-9_33 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationDamgård, I., & Jurik, M. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44586-2_9 · Cited by 1,063
Practical Threshold Signatures
Shoup, V. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45539-6_15 · Cited by 874
Designated Verifier Proofs and Their Applications
Jakobsson, M., Sako, K., & Impagliazzo, R. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-68339-9_13 · Cited by 817
A secure and optimally efficient multi‐authority election scheme
Cramer, R., Gennaro, R., & Schoenmakers, B. (1997) · European Transactions on Telecommunications · doi:10.1002/ett.4460080506 · Cited by 784
A new public-key cryptosystem as secure as factoring
Okamoto, T., & Uchiyama, S. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054135 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Coercion-resistant electronic elections
Juels, A., Catalano, D., & Jakobsson, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102213 · Cited by 414
Threshold Ring Signatures and Applications to Ad-hoc Groups
Bresson, E., Stern, J., & Szydlo, M. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45708-9_30 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baudron, O., Fouque, P.-A., Pointcheval, D., Stern, J., & Poupard, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-08
- Pages
- 274-283
- OpenAlex
- W2004015610
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical multi-candidate election system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/383962.384044
- The paper
- Baudron, O., Fouque, P.-A., Pointcheval, D., Stern, J., & Poupard, G. (2001). Practical multi-candidate election system. Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/383962.384044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
