Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,988

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: a dynamic reference work

Nodelman, Uri, Allen, Colin, Zalta, Edward N.·2002·Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries

Abstract

The Recent work of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy project http://plato.stanford.edu/ has been focused on fostering and managing the growth of a dynamic reference work. Our particular project is to produce an authoritative and comprehensive dynamic reference work devoted to the academic discipline of philosophy that will be kept up to date dynamically so as to remain useful to those in academia and the general public.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/544220.544327

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,988

Metadata

Authors
Nodelman, U., Allen, C., & Zalta, E. N.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Publisher
ACM
Published
2002-07-14
Pages
380-380
OpenAlex
W2119859848
Cited by
1,988
References
5
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: a dynamic reference work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/544220.544327
The paper
Nodelman, U., Allen, C., & Zalta, E. N. (2002). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: a dynamic reference work. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. https://doi.org/10.1145/544220.544327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.