Cited by 638Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Building customer trust in mobile commerce

Open access
Siau, Keng, Shen, Zixing·2003·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Gaining customer trust in m-commerce is a daunting process, extending from initial trust formation to continuous trust development---but it can be done.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/641205.641211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siau, K., & Shen, Z.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2003-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
91-94
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2012299124
Cited by
638
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 35
FWCI
41.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
consumer trust, mobile commerce, trust formation, trust building, online trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review