Cited by 376Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorUser Authentication and Security Systems

Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan

Afshan, Sahar, Sharif, Arshian·2016·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.005

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other authors analyse different antecedents for trust and integrate other technological constructs, allowing them to analyse differences between men and women to determine the moderating effect of gender.

    “Other authors (Afshan & Sharif, 2016) analyse different antecedents for trust and integrate other technological constructs, allowing them to analyse differences between men and women to determine the moderating effect of gender (Oliveira et al., 2014).”
  • Clients value guarantees by financial institutions regarding online purchases and the handling of confidential information.

    “with regard to e-banking, studies by Afshan & Sharif (2016) and Chong et al. (2010) show that clients value guarantees by financial institutions regarding online purchases and the handling of confidential information.”
  • UTAUT and UTAUT2 models have been widely used to study acceptance of e-banking, indicating that performance expectancy, facilitating conditions and trust are important to the acceptance of e-banking.

    “The UTAUT and UTAUT2 models have been widely used to study acceptance of e-banking, indicating that performance expectancy, facilitating conditions and trust are important to the acceptance of e-banking”
  • Task characteristics had a more significant impact on task-technology fit than technology characteristics.

    “Notably, our research discovered that task characteristics had a more significant impact on task-technology-fit than technology characteristics, even though TC has been reported in some studies [40,88] to have a more significant effect on PEOU and PU than TC.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afshan, S., & Sharif, A.
Affiliations
  • Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education (PK)
  • Iqra University (PK)
Corresponding author
Sharif, Arshian
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
370-387
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1775573020
Cited by
376
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
41.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
mobile banking, technology acceptance, behavioral intention, task-technology fit, UTAUT, initial trust, structural assurance, facilitating conditions, university students, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review