Cited by 13Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAcademic Writing and PublishingPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Author Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic Papers

Open access
Menzies, Rachel, Tigwell, Garreth W., Crabb, Michael·2022·ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

Abstract

Academic papers demonstrate inaccessibility despite accessible writing resources made available by SIGACCESS and others. The move from accessibility guidance to accessibility implementation is challenging for authors. Our work focuses on understanding what challenges authors of academic papers face in creating content elements (e.g., tables, charts, images) to better understand how to improve accessibility. We classified 3,866 content elements from 330 papers covering a 10-year sample of academic work from ASSETS to understand the variety used. We also reflected on the design choices that make the content elements inaccessible. We then conducted interviews with 13 academic authors from PhD student through to Professor Emeritus that publish within top-tier accessibility and HCI venues to understand the challenges faced in creating accessible content. We found critical issues in how academics understand and implement accessibility while also balancing the visual design of the paper. We provide recommendations for improving accessibility in the academic paper-writing process and focus on steps that can be taken by authors, publishers, researchers, and universities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3546195

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In HCI, only about 5% of publications have valid alt text, which is even worse in other fields like science, medicine, and engineering.

    “Recent work [5, 14, 41] shows that in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), where accessibility research is advocated, only about 5% of publications have valid alt text, which is even worse in other fields like science, medicine, and engineering [51, 54].”
  • Prior works have extensively documented the challenges of using Acrobat, including the high cost of software license, an unintuitive user interface, and the low-quality of automated tags requiring authors to manually review and correct them.

    “However, as discussed in the previous subsection, prior works [2, 17] have extensively documented the challenges of using Acrobat, including the high cost of software license, an unintuitive user interface, and the low-quality of automated tags requiring authors to manually review and correct them.”

    From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Authors with disabilities faced additional barriers due to the inaccessibility of remediation tools themselves, which delayed their progress and limited their agency.

    “Notably, they underscored how authors with disabilities faced additional barriers due to the inaccessibility of remediation tools themselves, which delayed their progress and limited their agency.”

    From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Authors have long complained about the tedious process of PDF tagging, the difficulty of applying accessibility practices to complex visual elements, the poor usability of existing tools, and even knowing whether they are doing it correctly.

    “They have long complained about the tedious process of PDF tagging, the difficulty of applying accessibility practices to complex visual elements, the poor usability of existing tools, and even knowing whether they are doing it correctly [2, 17].”

    From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menzies, R., Tigwell, G. W., & Crabb, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Published
2022-10-22
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 1936-7228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-7236
OpenAlex
W4283805395
Cited by
12
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
accessibility, academic papers, accessible writing, content elements, charts and tables, image accessibility, visual design, accessibility guidelines, assets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review