The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal Effectors and Plant Susceptibility
Open accessAbstract
Plants can be colonized by fungi that have adopted highly diverse lifestyles, ranging from symbiotic to necrotrophic. Colonization is governed in all systems by hundreds of secreted fungal effector molecules. These effectors suppress plant defense responses and modulate plant physiology to accommodate fungal invaders and provide them with nutrients. Fungal effectors either function in the interaction zone between the fungal hyphae and host or are transferred to plant cells. This review describes the effector repertoires of 84 plant-colonizing fungi. We focus on the mechanisms that allow these fungal effectors to promote virulence or compatibility, discuss common plant nodes that are targeted by effectors, and provide recent insights into effector evolution. In addition, we address the issue of effector uptake in plant cells and highlight open questions and future challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions
Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., & Nielsen, H. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701 · Cited by 8,847
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
O'Connell, R. J., Thon, M. R., Hacquard, S., Amyotte, S. G., Kleemann, J., Torres, M. F., Damm, U., Buiate, E. A., Epstein, L., Alkan, N., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2372 · Cited by 1,047
Cited by
Baroncelli, R., Amby, D. B., Zapparata, A., Sarrocco, S., Vannacci, G., Le Floch, G., Harrison, R. J., Holub, E., Sukno, S. A., Sreenivasaprasad, S., et al. (2016) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2917-6 · Cited by 179
Rocafort, M., Bowen, J. K., Hassing, B., Cox, M. P., McGreal, B., de la Rosa, S., Plummer, K. M., Bradshaw, R. E., & Mesarich, C. H. (2022) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-022-01442-9 · Cited by 52
A lineage-specific Exo70 is required for receptor kinase–mediated immunity in barley
Holden, S., Bergum, M., Green, P., Bettgenhaeuser, J., Hernández-Pinzón, I., Thind, A., Clare, S., Russell, J. M., Hubbard, A., Taylor, J., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn7258 · Cited by 29
Breeding and management of major resistance genes to stem canker/blackleg in Brassica crops
Vasquez-Teuber, P., Rouxel, T., Mason, A. S., & Soyer, J. L. (2024) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-024-04641-w · Cited by 19
Tarallo, M., Dobbie, K. B., Leite, L. N., Waters, T. L., Gillard, K. N. T., Sen, D., Mesarich, C. H., Bradshaw, R. E., & McDougal, R. L. (2024) · Phytopathology Research · doi:10.1186/s42483-024-00255-8 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo Presti, L., Lanver, D., Schweizer, G., Tanaka, S., Liang, L., Tollot, M., Zuccaro, A., Reissmann, S., & Kahmann, R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-04-29
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 513-545
- ISSN
- 1543-5008 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2123
- OpenAlex
- W2171209136
- Cited by
- 1,249
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
