Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane Fusion: Five Lipids, Four SNAREs, Three Chaperones, Two Nucleotides, and a Rab, All Dancing in a Ring on Yeast Vacuoles

Wickner, William·2010·Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

Although fusion mechanisms are highly conserved in evolution and among organelles of the exocytic and endocytic pathways, yeast vacuole homotypic fusion offers unique technical advantages: excellent genetics, clear organelle cytology, in vitro colorimetric fusion assays, and reconstitution of fusion from all-pure components, including a Rab GTPase, HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting complex), four SNAREs [soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment receptors] that snare (bind) each other, SNARE-complex disassembly chaperones, and vacuolar lipids. Vacuole fusion studies offer paradigms of the interdependence of lipids and fusion proteins to assemble a fusion microdomain, distinct lipid functions, SNARE complex proofreading through the synergy between HOPS and the SNARE disassembly chaperones, and the role of each fusion protein in promoting radical bilayer restructuring for fusion without lysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104131

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wickner, W.
Venue
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2010-11-10
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
115-136
ISSN
  • 1081-0706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8995
OpenAlex
W2011461336
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.