Cited by 78Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCell Adhesion Molecules Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polarized Protein Transport and Lumen Formation During Epithelial Tissue Morphogenesis

Open access
Blasky, Alex J., Mangan, Anthony, Prekeris, Rytis·2015·Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

One of the major challenges in biology is to explain how complex tissues and organs arise from the collective action of individual polarized cells. The best-studied model of this process is the cross talk between individual epithelial cells during their polarization to form the multicellular epithelial lumen during tissue morphogenesis. Multiple mechanisms of apical lumen formation have been proposed. Some epithelial lumens form from preexisting polarized epithelial structures. However, de novo lumen formation from nonpolarized cells has recently emerged as an important driver of epithelial tissue morphogenesis, especially during the formation of small epithelial tubule networks. In this review, we discuss the latest findings regarding the mechanisms and regulation of de novo lumen formation in vitro and in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125323

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are two main views of the mechanism mode of glandular lumen formation: cavitation and cell bundle hollowing.

    “There are currently two main views of the mechanism mode of glandular lumen formation: cavitation (driven by cell death of inner cells) and cell bundle hollowing (driven by epithelial polarity without cell death).[11]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blasky, A. J., Mangan, A., & Prekeris, R.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2015-11-13
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
575-591
ISSN
  • 1081-0706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8995
OpenAlex
W2126964995
Cited by
78
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM08730, T32GM008730)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK064380)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
lumen formation, cell polarity, apical-basal polarity, intercellular communication
MeSH terms
Animals, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Morphogenesis, Cell Polarity, Protein Transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review