Cited by 112Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Transforming the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the United States: The RAISE Initiative

Open access
Dixon, Lisa B., Goldman, Howard H., Srihari, Vinod H., Kane, John M.·2018·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The schizophrenia spectrum disorders are neurodevelopmental illnesses with a lifetime prevalence near 1%, producing extensive functional impairment and low expectations for recovery. Until recently, treatment in the United States has largely attempted to stabilize individuals with chronic schizophrenia. The identification and promotion of evidence-based practices for schizophrenia via the Patient Outcomes Research Team, combined with international studies supporting the value of early intervention, provided the foundation for the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) project. The RAISE studies further supported the value of reducing the duration of untreated psychosis and providing a multi-element treatment called coordinated specialty care (CSC) to improve outcomes for patients in usual treatment settings. Although CSC programs have proliferated rapidly in the United States, many challenges remain in the treatment and recovery of individuals with schizophrenia in the aftermath of RAISE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084934

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Edwards JE, McGorry PD. 2002. Implementing Early Intervention in Psychosis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
  2. Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, Borgwardt S, Kempton MJ, 2012. Predicting psychosis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69(3): 220– 29 22393215
  3. Goldman HH, Karakus MC, Frey W, Beronio K. 2013. Financing first episode psychosis services in the United States. Psychiatr. Serv 64(6): 506– 8 23728599
  4. Grob GN. 1994. The Mad Among US. New York: Free Press
  5. Inst. Med. 2013. Observational Studies in a Learning Health System: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press 24830068

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixon, L. B., Goldman, H. H., Srihari, V. H., & Kane, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2018-05-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
237-258
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2782714767
Cited by
112
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RC1MH088971, R01MH120597)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, coordinated specialty care, early intervention, duration of untreated psychosis, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recovery, evidence-based practice, functional disability
MeSH terms
Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, United States, Program Development, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review