Cited by 131Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Jail Incarceration: A Common and Consequential Form of Criminal Justice Contact

Turney, Kristin, Conner, Emma·2019·Annual Review of Criminology

Abstract

Although jails are both common and consequential, affecting millions of individuals annually, they are a relatively understudied aspect of the criminal justice system. In this review, we first document the prevalence of jail incarceration, highlighting how jail incarceration has risen in tandem with the more commonly examined prison incarceration. Next, we describe the population of individuals in jail, paying particular attention to the heterogeneous and disadvantaged nature of this population. We document how jail incarceration is measured, demographically and in household surveys, and argue that jail incarceration has lasting and profound consequences for individuals, families, and communities. We conclude the review by suggesting directions for future research. Given the common nature of jail incarceration—in conjunction with the fact that jail incarceration creates, sustains, and perpetuates inequality—a better understanding of the prevalence, correlates, and consequences of jail incarceration is critical for fully understanding the link between the criminal justice system and inequality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024601

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 139

  1. 10.1007/s10461-011-9990-2 · DOI
  2. Albert B, 2010, State Prisoners in County Jails
  3. 10.1177/0002716216629360 · DOI
  4. 10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.448 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00195.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/jomf.12159 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.039 · DOI
  8. Baradaran SB, 2012, Tex. Law Rev., 90, 497
  9. 10.1093/jurban/jth146 · DOI
  10. Board State Community Correct., 2016, ADP & rated capacity
  11. 10.1007/s10461-012-0354-3 · DOI
  12. Bronson J, 2017, Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12
  13. Bronson J, 2017, Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007–2009
  14. 10.1111/jomf.12412 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s13524-017-0589-8 · DOI
  16. Carson EA, 2018, Prisoners in 2016
  17. 10.1007/s10461-011-0080-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01085.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1353/jhr.2009.0003 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00649.x · DOI
  22. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301952 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/1078345812456010 · DOI
  24. 10.7208/chicago/9780226114682.001.0001 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0002716215625038 · DOI
  26. 10.2139/ssrn.3168490 · DOI
  27. DeMichele M, 2018, The intuitive-override model: nudging judges toward pretrial risk assessment instruments
  28. 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1522 · DOI
  29. 10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.399 · DOI
  30. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056325 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10461-013-0590-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0093854887014003003 · DOI
  34. Glob. Deten. Proj., 2017, Annual Report 2016
  35. 10.1177/001112878002600204 · DOI
  36. Grant GA, 2018, Jan. 1–Dec. 31 2017 report to the Governor and the Legislature
  37. 10.1086/688907 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01138.x · DOI
  39. 10.2105/AJPH.92.11.1789 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/sf/sox047 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0022427806295001 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0003122417709294 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Henrichson C, 2015, The price of jails: measuring the taxpayer cost of local incarceration
  44. Holmes MD, 1984, Soc. Sci. Q., 65, 265
  45. Hum. Rights Watch., 2017, “Not in it for justice”: how California’s pretrial detention and bail system unfairly punishes poor people
  46. 10.1525/9780520957459 · DOI
  47. Kang-Brown J, 2017, Out of Sight: The Growth of Jails in Rural America
  48. Karberg JC, 2005, Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002
  49. 10.1177/0003122417710462 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/002204260903900406 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.041 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/add.12894 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/aje/kwu313 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141912 · DOI
  55. 10.1023/A:1007524426382 · DOI
  56. 10.1023/A:1018794305843 · DOI
  57. 10.1177/0002716215599732 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00165.x · DOI
  59. 10.1525/sp.2011.58.2.257 · DOI
  60. MacArthur Found. 2015. MacArthur launches $75M initiative to reduce America's use of jails . Press Release, Feb. 10. https://www.macfound.org/press/press-releases/macarthur-launches-75m-initiative-reduce-americas-use-jails/
  61. 10.1007/s10940-014-9231-8 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1037/e500022007-001 · DOI
  63. Maruschak LM, 2016, Medical problems of state and federal prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12
  64. 10.1177/002214650804900105 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/0003122412471669 · DOI
  66. 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112326 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1093/sf/90.1.133 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s12103-013-9215-5 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s13524-016-0493-7 · DOI
  70. 10.1037/e560272006-001 · DOI
  71. Murphey D, 2105, Child Trends, 42, 1
  72. Natl. Bail Out., 2018, What We Have Done So Far
  73. Natl. Immigr. Forum., 2011, Immigrants Behind Bars: How, Why and How Much?
  74. Natl. Res. Counc., 2014, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences
  75. New York City Counc., 2018, Reforming the bail system
  76. 10.1080/07418825.2014.959035 · DOI
  77. Pettit B, 2012, Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress
  78. Phillips MT, 2012, A decade of bail research in New York City
  79. 10.1037/a0020279 · DOI
  80. 10.1017/S0954579417000062 · DOI
  81. 10.1177/0022146514531438 · DOI
  82. 10.1080/07418825.2016.1226938 · DOI
  83. Pretrial Justice Inst., 2016, Key features of holistic pretrial justice statutes and court rules
  84. Rabuy B, 2016, Detaining the poor: how money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time
  85. Rabuy B, 2015, Screening Out Family Time: The For-Profit Video Visitation Industry in Prisons and Jails
  86. Rahman I, 2017, Against the odds: experimenting with alternative forms of bail in New York City's criminal courts
  87. Rahman I, 2017, The State of Justice Reform 2017
  88. Rankin A, 1964, N. Y. Univ. Law Rev., 39, 641
  89. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00253.x · DOI
  90. 10.1177/0887403412461501 · DOI
  91. Sacks V, 2018, The Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Nationally, by State, and by Race or Ethnicity
  92. 10.1525/sp.2013.60.2.234 · DOI
  93. 10.1177/002214650704800202 · DOI
  94. 10.1177/0022146512453928 · DOI
  95. Schriro D, 2009, Immigration detention overview and recommendations
  96. 10.1177/0032885515605490 · DOI
  97. Stevenson MT. 2017. Distortion of justice: how the inability to pay bail affects case outcomes. SSRN Electron. J. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2777615 · DOI
  98. Subramanian R, 2015, Incarceration's front door: the misuse of jails in America
  99. Subramanian R, 2015, In our own backyard: confronting growth and disparities in American jails
  100. 10.1177/0003122417713188 · DOI
  101. Swavola E, 2016, Overlooked: Women and Jails in an Era of Reform
  102. Sykes BL, 2016, Russell Sage Found. J. Soc. Sci., 2, 129
  103. 10.1177/0002716214526345 · DOI
  104. Sykes BL, 2015, Russell Sage Found. J. Soc. Sci., 1, 108
  105. Sykes GM, 1958, The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison
  106. 10.1080/14786010902975507 · DOI
  107. 10.1177/2156869317707002 · DOI
  108. 10.1177/0093854817753018 · DOI
  109. 10.1177/0022146514544173 · DOI
  110. 10.1093/socpro/spv015 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1007/s13524-016-0543-1 · DOI
  112. 10.1111/jomf.12429 · DOI
  113. 10.1177/0003122413505589 · DOI
  114. 10.1093/sf/sox070 · DOI
  115. 10.1177/0022146512462400 · DOI
  116. Univ. Albany Hindelang Crim. Justice Res. Cent., 2011, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
  117. US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, employment status for the population 16 years and over, table K202301
  118. US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, poverty status in the past 12 months by age, table K201701
  119. US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, race, table K200201
  120. Wagner P, 2016, Some Private Prisons Are, Um, Public
  121. Wagner P, 2017, Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2017
  122. Wagner P, 2018, Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2018
  123. 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00740.x · DOI
  125. 10.1086/684033 · DOI
  126. 10.1111/cico.12207 · DOI
  127. 10.2307/3088944 · DOI · Paper page
  128. 10.1086/681301 · DOI
  129. 10.1353/dem.0.0052 · DOI · Paper page
  130. 10.1353/sof.2010.0055 · DOI
  131. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105459 · DOI
  132. 10.1177/0003122411436234 · DOI
  133. 10.1177/0002716215625042 · DOI
  134. 10.1177/073401680302800206 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Willison D, 1984, Justice J, 9, 87
  136. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.004 · DOI
  137. 10.1177/1557988316681339 · DOI
  138. 10.1007/s10461-013-0472-6 · DOI
  139. Zeng Z, 2018, Jail inmates in 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 131

Metadata

Authors
Turney, K., & Conner, E.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Criminology
Published
2019-01-13
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
265-290
ISSN
2572-4568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898482961
Cited by
131
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
jail incarceration, pretrial detention, criminal justice system contact, disadvantaged groups, household surveys, family impact, community impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review