The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jail Incarceration: A Common and Consequential Form of Criminal Justice Contact
Abstract
Although jails are both common and consequential, affecting millions of individuals annually, they are a relatively understudied aspect of the criminal justice system. In this review, we first document the prevalence of jail incarceration, highlighting how jail incarceration has risen in tandem with the more commonly examined prison incarceration. Next, we describe the population of individuals in jail, paying particular attention to the heterogeneous and disadvantaged nature of this population. We document how jail incarceration is measured, demographically and in household surveys, and argue that jail incarceration has lasting and profound consequences for individuals, families, and communities. We conclude the review by suggesting directions for future research. Given the common nature of jail incarceration—in conjunction with the fact that jail incarceration creates, sustains, and perpetuates inequality—a better understanding of the prevalence, correlates, and consequences of jail incarceration is critical for fully understanding the link between the criminal justice system and inequality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recent scholarship has moved beyond imprisonment rates to include other forms of incarceration such as sentenced jail incarceration (Turney and Connor 2019) or pretrial detention (Williams 2003), police contact (Geller and Fagan 2019), exposure to police violence (Edwards et al. 2019), and criminal legal system contact that may not involve incarceration but remains consequential for social”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Turney and Connor 2019
Citations
Cites
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840
Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900201 · Cited by 1,499
Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness Among Jail Inmates
Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2009.60.6.761 · Cited by 850
Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161503 · Cited by 564
Collateral Consequences of Punishment: A Critical Review and Path Forward
Kirk, D. S., & Wakefield, S. (2018) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092045 · Cited by 346
Binswanger, I. A., Merrill, J. O., Krueger, P. M., White, M. C., Booth, R. E., & Elmore, J. G. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.149591 · Cited by 316
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 139
- 10.1007/s10461-011-9990-2 · DOI
- Albert B, 2010, State Prisoners in County Jails
- 10.1177/0002716216629360 · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.448 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00195.x · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.12159 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.039 · DOI
- Baradaran SB, 2012, Tex. Law Rev., 90, 497
- 10.1093/jurban/jth146 · DOI
- Board State Community Correct., 2016, ADP & rated capacity
- 10.1007/s10461-012-0354-3 · DOI
- Bronson J, 2017, Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12
- Bronson J, 2017, Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007–2009
- 10.1111/jomf.12412 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13524-017-0589-8 · DOI
- Carson EA, 2018, Prisoners in 2016
- 10.1007/s10461-011-0080-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01085.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1353/jhr.2009.0003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00649.x · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301952 · DOI
- 10.1177/1078345812456010 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226114682.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716215625038 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.3168490 · DOI
- DeMichele M, 2018, The intuitive-override model: nudging judges toward pretrial risk assessment instruments
- 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1522 · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.399 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10461-013-0590-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854887014003003 · DOI
- Glob. Deten. Proj., 2017, Annual Report 2016
- 10.1177/001112878002600204 · DOI
- Grant GA, 2018, Jan. 1–Dec. 31 2017 report to the Governor and the Legislature
- 10.1086/688907 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01138.x · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.92.11.1789 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sf/sox047 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022427806295001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122417709294 · DOI · Paper page
- Henrichson C, 2015, The price of jails: measuring the taxpayer cost of local incarceration
- Holmes MD, 1984, Soc. Sci. Q., 65, 265
- Hum. Rights Watch., 2017, “Not in it for justice”: how California’s pretrial detention and bail system unfairly punishes poor people
- 10.1525/9780520957459 · DOI
- Kang-Brown J, 2017, Out of Sight: The Growth of Jails in Rural America
- Karberg JC, 2005, Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002
- 10.1177/0003122417710462 · DOI
- 10.1177/002204260903900406 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.041 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.12894 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwu313 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0141912 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1007524426382 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018794305843 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716215599732 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00165.x · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2011.58.2.257 · DOI
- MacArthur Found. 2015. MacArthur launches $75M initiative to reduce America's use of jails . Press Release, Feb. 10. https://www.macfound.org/press/press-releases/macarthur-launches-75m-initiative-reduce-americas-use-jails/
- 10.1007/s10940-014-9231-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/e500022007-001 · DOI
- Maruschak LM, 2016, Medical problems of state and federal prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12
- 10.1177/002214650804900105 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122412471669 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112326 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sf/90.1.133 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12103-013-9215-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13524-016-0493-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/e560272006-001 · DOI
- Murphey D, 2105, Child Trends, 42, 1
- Natl. Bail Out., 2018, What We Have Done So Far
- Natl. Immigr. Forum., 2011, Immigrants Behind Bars: How, Why and How Much?
- Natl. Res. Counc., 2014, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences
- New York City Counc., 2018, Reforming the bail system
- 10.1080/07418825.2014.959035 · DOI
- Pettit B, 2012, Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress
- Phillips MT, 2012, A decade of bail research in New York City
- 10.1037/a0020279 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954579417000062 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022146514531438 · DOI
- 10.1080/07418825.2016.1226938 · DOI
- Pretrial Justice Inst., 2016, Key features of holistic pretrial justice statutes and court rules
- Rabuy B, 2016, Detaining the poor: how money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time
- Rabuy B, 2015, Screening Out Family Time: The For-Profit Video Visitation Industry in Prisons and Jails
- Rahman I, 2017, Against the odds: experimenting with alternative forms of bail in New York City's criminal courts
- Rahman I, 2017, The State of Justice Reform 2017
- Rankin A, 1964, N. Y. Univ. Law Rev., 39, 641
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00253.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0887403412461501 · DOI
- Sacks V, 2018, The Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Nationally, by State, and by Race or Ethnicity
- 10.1525/sp.2013.60.2.234 · DOI
- 10.1177/002214650704800202 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022146512453928 · DOI
- Schriro D, 2009, Immigration detention overview and recommendations
- 10.1177/0032885515605490 · DOI
- Stevenson MT. 2017. Distortion of justice: how the inability to pay bail affects case outcomes. SSRN Electron. J. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2777615 · DOI
- Subramanian R, 2015, Incarceration's front door: the misuse of jails in America
- Subramanian R, 2015, In our own backyard: confronting growth and disparities in American jails
- 10.1177/0003122417713188 · DOI
- Swavola E, 2016, Overlooked: Women and Jails in an Era of Reform
- Sykes BL, 2016, Russell Sage Found. J. Soc. Sci., 2, 129
- 10.1177/0002716214526345 · DOI
- Sykes BL, 2015, Russell Sage Found. J. Soc. Sci., 1, 108
- Sykes GM, 1958, The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison
- 10.1080/14786010902975507 · DOI
- 10.1177/2156869317707002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854817753018 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022146514544173 · DOI
- 10.1093/socpro/spv015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s13524-016-0543-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.12429 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122413505589 · DOI
- 10.1093/sf/sox070 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022146512462400 · DOI
- Univ. Albany Hindelang Crim. Justice Res. Cent., 2011, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
- US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, employment status for the population 16 years and over, table K202301
- US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, poverty status in the past 12 months by age, table K201701
- US Census Bur., 2016, 1-Year estimates, race, table K200201
- Wagner P, 2016, Some Private Prisons Are, Um, Public
- Wagner P, 2017, Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2017
- Wagner P, 2018, Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2018
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00740.x · DOI
- 10.1086/684033 · DOI
- 10.1111/cico.12207 · DOI
- 10.2307/3088944 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/681301 · DOI
- 10.1353/dem.0.0052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/sof.2010.0055 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105459 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122411436234 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716215625042 · DOI
- 10.1177/073401680302800206 · DOI · Paper page
- Willison D, 1984, Justice J, 9, 87
- 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1557988316681339 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10461-013-0472-6 · DOI
- Zeng Z, 2018, Jail inmates in 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 3
“The second author, Kristin Turney (also a sociologist), pointed out the relative absence of scholarship on jail incarceration—an experience “affecting millions of Americans an-nually”—as recently as 2019 (Turney and Connor 2019, 265).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turney, K., & Conner, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- ORCID
- Turney, Kristin
- Venue
- Annual Review of Criminology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-01-13
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-290
- ISSN
- 2572-4568 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898482961
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- jail incarceration, pretrial detention, criminal justice system contact, disadvantaged groups, household surveys, family impact, community impact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review