Cited by 353Social Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and PoliticsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda

Open access
Qin, Bei, Strömberg, David, Wu, Yanhui·2017·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

In this paper, we document basic facts regarding public debates about controversial political issues on Chinese social media. Our documentation is based on a dataset of 13.2 billion blog posts published on Sina Weibo—the most prominent Chinese microblogging platform—during the 2009–2013 period. Our primary finding is that a shockingly large number of posts on highly sensitive topics were published and circulated on social media. For instance, we find millions of posts discussing protests, and these posts are informative in predicting the occurrence of specific events. We find an even larger number of posts with explicit corruption allegations, and that these posts predict future corruption charges of specific individuals. Our findings challenge a popular view that an authoritarian regime would relentlessly censor or even ban social media. Instead, the interaction of an authoritarian government with social media seems more complex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.31.1.117

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The matching approach overcomes the potential problem in fixed-effects models with misspecified temporal lag structures arising from the assumption that independent variables are serially uncorrelated.

    “This approach overcomes the potential problem in fixed-effects models with (misspecified) temporal lag structures arising from the assumption that the independent variables are serially uncorrelated.”

    From Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure (2026) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Surveillance section describes detecting collective-action events from social-media posts, while Conclusions and Discussion mentions regressions and a matched comparison of officials. Neither passage addresses whether matching overcomes misspecified temporal lags in fixed-effects models. Searches for that methodological claim and for serially uncorrelated independent variables found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. economist.com/news/special-report/21574628- internet-was-expected-help-democratise-china- instead-it-has-enabled. Freedom House. 2012. "Freedom on the Net: China." https://freedomhouse.org/report/ freedom-net/2012/china. Freedom House. 2015. "2015 Freedom of the Press Data." https://freedomhouse.org/ report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.
  2. Chandan Kumar Jha, Bibhudutta Panda, Santosh Kumar Sahu. 2022. Institutions and Conflict. SSRN Electronic Journal 76. . [Crossref] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
117-140
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2581925873
Cited by
353
References
179
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
55.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Keywords
social media regulation, authoritarianism, censorship, Weibo, microblogging, protest, political surveillance, propaganda, corruption allegations, online political discussion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review