The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Wind in the Willows: Flows in Forest Canopies in Complex Terrain
Abstract
Forest canopies are important components of the terrestrial carbon budget, which has motivated a worldwide effort, FLUXNET, to measure CO 2 exchange between forests and the atmosphere. These measurements are difficult to interpret and to scale up to estimate exchange across a landscape. Here we review the effects of complex terrain on the mean flow, turbulence, and scalar exchange in canopy flows, as exemplified by adjustment to forest edges and hills, including the effects of stable stratification. We focus on the fundamental fluid mechanics, in which developments in theory, measurements, and modeling, particularly through large-eddy simulation, are identifying important processes and providing scaling arguments. These developments set the stage for the development of predictive models that can be used in combination with measurements to estimate exchange at the landscape scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baldocchi, D., Falge, E. M., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D. Y., Running, S. W., Anthoni, P. M., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K. J., Evans, R., et al. (2001) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:fantts>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 3,787
Plant Physiological Ecology: Field methods and instrumentation
(2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9013-1 · Cited by 3,294
Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement
Kaimal, J. C., & Finnigan, J. J. (1994) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195062397.001.0001 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationCanadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702737104 · Cited by 2,136
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Canadell, J. G., Marland, G., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A., Foster, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo689 · Cited by 2,096
Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0998 · Cited by 1,786
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S., & Pons, T. L. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2855-2 · Cited by 1,769
Finnigan, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.519 · Cited by 1,596
Self-citationOn the stability of heterogeneous shear flows
Miles, J. W. (1961) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112061000305 · Cited by 1,524
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Cited by
Characterizing natural riparian vegetation for modeling of flow and suspended sediment transport
Västilä, K., & Järvelä, J. (2018) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1776-3 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Belcher, S. E., Harman, I. N., & Finnigan, J. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-01-21
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 479-504
- ISSN
- 0066-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4479
- OpenAlex
- W2102877521
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Wind in the Willows: Flows in Forest Canopies in Complex Terrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101036
- The paper
- Belcher, S. E., Harman, I. N., & Finnigan, J. J. (2012). The Wind in the Willows: Flows in Forest Canopies in Complex Terrain. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
