CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185Populism, Right-Wing MovementsPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Populism and Democratic Theory

Open access
Mansbridge, Jane, Macedo, Stephen·2019·Annual Review of Law and Social Science
DOI 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Commentators routinely describe “populism” as vague. Some argue that the early US populists, who coined the modern usage, were not populists. We disagree and identify this common conceptual core: the “people” in a moral battle against “elites.” The core definition fits all cases of populism: those on the left and right, those in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In addition to this minimal common core, we identify strongly suggested and frequently correlated non-core characteristics. These include the people's homogeneity and exclusivity, direct rule, and nationalism, as well as a single leader, vilification of vulnerable out-groups, and impatience with deliberation. The US Populist Party and Spain's Podemos Party fit the core definition but have few of the other characteristics. The core can be good for democracy, we argue, while the associated characteristics are often dangerous. Populism in opposition can be good for democracy, while populism in power carries great risks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Albright M., 2018, Fascism: A Warning
  2. Bennhold K., 2018, New York Times
  3. Bonikowski B, 2016, APSA Comp. Politics Newsl., 26, 7
  4. Brown S., 2017, Cincinnati.com
  5. Canovan M., 1981, Populism
  6. De Nadal LA., 2018, From “horizontal” to “vertical”: the institutionalization of the Indignados Movement
  7. Errejón Í, 2016, Podemos: In the Name of the People
  8. Fraser N., 1995, New Left Rev, 1, 68
  9. Garvin WL, 1887, History of the National Farmers’ Alliance and Cooperative Union of America
  10. Iglesias P., 2015, Lamarea
  11. Laclau E., 2005, On Populist Reason
  12. Lévi-Strauss C., 1950, Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie
  13. Levitsky S, 2018, How Democracies Die
  14. Mansbridge J, 2019, Populism and democratic theory: an extended view
  15. Mouffe C., 2018, For a Left Populism
  16. Pedler A., 1927, Slavon. Rev., 6, 130
  17. Piketty T., 2018, Brahmin left versus merchant right: rising inequality and the changing structure of political conflict (evidence from France, Britain and the US, 1948–2017
  18. Rawls J., 1999, The Law of Peoples
  19. Rodrik D., 2018, Project Syndicate
  20. Rousseau J-J., 1997, The Second Contract and Other Later Political Writings
  21. Walzer M, 1983, Spheres of Justice
  22. Woodward CV, 1959, Am. Sch., 29, 55
  23. World Values Survey, 2013, Wave 2010–2014, Germany, variable V228G

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2019-10-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
59-77
ISSN
  • 1550-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-3631
DOI
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
OpenAlex
W2980269812
Cited by
185
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Annual Review of Law and Social Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
populism, democratic theory, definition of populism, Podemos, nationalism, deliberation, political homogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review