The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Representation Learning
Open accessAbstract
The central theme of this review is the dynamic interaction between information selection and learning. We pose a fundamental question about this interaction: How do we learn what features of our experiences are worth learning about? In humans, this process depends on attention and memory, two cognitive functions that together constrain representations of the world to features that are relevant for goal attainment. Recent evidence suggests that the representations shaped by attention and memory are themselves inferred from experience with each task. We review this evidence and place it in the context of work that has explicitly characterized representation learning as statistical inference. We discuss how inference can be scaled to real-world decisions by approximating beliefs based on a small number of experiences. Finally, we highlight some implications of this inference process for human decision-making in social environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Without direct access to what is causing advent sensory information, meaning is derived from past events that seem similar to the current state of the body and world.136”
From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,093
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.52202/085713 · Cited by 16,043
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Johnson, J. D., Li, J., & Chen, Z. (2000) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(00)00324-6 · Cited by 8,825
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03748 · Cited by 6,242
Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences
Sutton, R. S. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00115009 · Cited by 5,148
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bellman R., 1957, J. Math. Mech., 6, 679
- Callaway F, 2019, PsyArXiv
- Jones M, 2010, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2010, 1, 1258
- Kleiman-Weiner M, 2016, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Mildner J, 2018, PsyArXiv
- Radulescu A, 2020, From heuristic to optimal models in naturalistic visual search
- Sitzmann V, 2019, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, 1121
- Vélez N, 2020, Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whittington, J. C. R., McCaffary, D., Bakermans, J. J. W., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01153-y · Cited by 278
Social Interactions for Autonomous Driving: A Review and Perspectives
Wang, W., Wang, L., Zhang, C., Liu, C., & Sun, L. (2022) · Foundations and Trends in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000078 · Cited by 197
A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder
Jungilligens, J., Paredes-Echeverri, S., Popkirov, S., Barrett, L. F., & Perez, D. L. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac204 · Cited by 164
On Social Interactions of Merging Behaviors at Highway On-Ramps in Congested Traffic
Wang, H., Wang, W., Yuan, S., Li, X., & Sun, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3102407 · Cited by 53
The cognitive (lateral) hypothalamus
Sharpe, M. J. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.019 · Cited by 42
Statistical Learning in Vision
Fiser, J., & Lengyel, G. (2022) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-100720-103343 · Cited by 43
Tracking human skill learning with a hierarchical Bayesian sequence model
Éltető, N., Németh, D., Janacsek, K., & Dayan, P. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009866 · Cited by 33
Unifying Principles of Generalization: Past, Present, and Future
Wu, C. M., Meder, B., & Schulz, E. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021524-110810 · Cited by 39
Latent-state and model-based learning in PTSD
Cisler, J. M., Dunsmoor, J. E., Fonzo, G. A., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2024) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.12.002 · Cited by 26
Adaptive tuning of human learning and choice variability to unexpected uncertainty
Lee, J. K., Rouault, M., & Wyart, V. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.add0501 · Cited by 23
Mill, R. D., & Cole, M. W. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65041-2 · Cited by 26
Collective cooperative intelligence
Barfuß, W., Flack, J. C., Gokhale, C. S., Hammond, L., Hilbe, C., Hughes, E., Leibo, J. Z., Lenaerts, T., Leonard, N. E., Levin, S. A., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2319948121 · Cited by 26
Parallel cognitive maps for multiple knowledge structures in the hippocampal formation
Zheng, X., Hebart, M. N., Grill, F., Dolan, R. J., Doeller, C. F., Cools, R., & Garvert, M. M. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad485 · Cited by 26
González‐Herrero, B., Happe, F. G. E., Nicholson, T. R., Morgante, F., Pagonabarraga, J., Deeley, Q., & Edwards, M. J. (2024) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70168 · Cited by 20
Advanced Reinforcement Learning and Its Connections with Brain Neuroscience
Fan, C., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Zhen, Z., & Wu, X. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0064 · Cited by 22
Affect-congruent attention modulates generalized reward expectations
Bennett, D., Radulescu, A., Zorowitz, S., Felso, V., & Niv, Y. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011707 · Cited by 17
Self-citationSocial uncertainty in the digital world
Ferguson, A. M., Turner, G., & Orben, A. C. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.005 · Cited by 16
Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies
Schultner, D. T., Molleman, L., & Lindström, B. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02269-4 · Cited by 20
Cognitive maps and schizophrenia
Nour, M. M., Liu, Y., El-Gaby, M., McCutcheon, R. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.011 · Cited by 19
Neurocomputational mechanism of real-time distributed learning on social networks
Jiang, Y., Mi, Q., & Zhu, L. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01258-y · Cited by 16
Grid codes underlie multiple cognitive maps in the human brain
Chen, D., Axmacher, N., & Wang, L. (2024) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2024.102569 · Cited by 13
Contextualizing predictive minds
Butz, M. V., Mittenbühler, M., Schwöbel, S., Achimova, A., Gumbsch, C., Otte, S., & Kiebel, S. J. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105948 · Cited by 15
Song, M., Baah, P. A., Cai, M. B., & Niv, Y. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010699 · Cited by 12
Self-citationContributions of Attention to Learning in Multidimensional Reward Environments
Wang, M. C., & Soltani, A. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2300-23.2024 · Cited by 13
Non-Stationary Representation Learning in Sequential Linear Bandits
Qin, Y., Menara, T., Oymak, S., Ching, S., & Pasqualetti, F. (2022) · IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems · doi:10.1109/ojcsys.2022.3178540 · Cited by 10
Humans learn generalizable representations through efficient coding
Fang, Z., & Sims, C. R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58848-6 · Cited by 9
Political reinforcement learners
Schulz, L., & Bhui, R. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.12.001 · Cited by 8
An inductive bias for slowly changing features in human reinforcement learning
Hedrich, N. L., Schulz, E., Hall-McMaster, S., & Schuck, N. W. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012568 · Cited by 7
Shen, G., He, Y., Kong, X., Ji, Z., Wang, L., Zhou, J., & Hu, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3562659 · Cited by 6
The successor representation subserves hierarchical abstraction for goal-directed behavior
Wientjes, S., & Holroyd, C. B. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011312 · Cited by 8
Neurocomputations of strategic behavior: From iterated to novel interactions
Jiang, Y., Wu, H., Mi, Q., & Zhu, L. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1598 · Cited by 7
Time, Control, and the Nervous System
Haimerl, C., Rodrigues, F. S., & Paton, J. J. (2025) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-112723-025348 · Cited by 6
Chu, X., & Ze-Jun, W. A. N. G. (2024) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2024.00689 · Cited by 5
Motivation and prediction-driven processing of social memoranda
Reggev, N. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105613 · Cited by 8
The effects of task similarity during representation learning in brains and neural networks
Menghi, N., Johnston, W. J., Viganò, S., Hinrichs, M. A. B., Maeß, B., Fusi, S., & Doeller, C. F. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66849-8 · Cited by 7
Representation Learning for Context-Dependent Decision-Making
Qin, Y., Menara, T., Oymak, S., Ching, S., & Pasqualetti, F. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc53348.2022.9867204 · Cited by 5
A Rational Trade-Off Between the Costs and Benefits of Automatic and Controlled ProcessingPreprint
Mittenbühler, M., Schwöbel, S., Dignath, D., Kiebel, S. J., & Butz, M. V. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gbcxq · Cited by 5
ConcVAE: Conceptual Representation Learning
Togo, R., Nakagawa, N., Ogawa, T., & Haseyama, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3404496 · Cited by 5
The Ubiquity of Time in Latent-cause Inference
Mirea, D.-M., Shin, Y. S., DuBrow, S., & Niv, Y. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02231 · Cited by 4
Self-citationTask-relevant representational spaces in human memory traces
Heinen, R. M., Rau, E. M. B., Herweg, N. A., & Axmacher, N. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013476 · Cited by 6
Social uncertainty in the digital worldPreprint
Ferguson, A. M., Turner, G., & Orben, A. C. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/m97ug · Cited by 4
Unifying principles of generalization: past, present, and futurePreprint
Wu, C. M., Meder, B., & Schulz, E. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6uz9q · Cited by 4
The emergence of task-relevant representations in a nonlinear decision-making task
Menghi, N., Silvestrin, F., Pascolini, L., & Penny, W. D. (2023) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107860 · Cited by 4
Free recall is shaped by inference and scaffolded by event structure
Karagoz, A. B., Kool, W., & Reagh, Z. M. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00243-4 · Cited by 2
Neural signatures underlying the effect of social structure on empathy and altruistic behaviors
Tian, X., Zheng, Z., Li, R., Luo, Y., & Feng, C. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121267 · Cited by 2
Semantic Anchors Facilitate Task Encoding in Continual Learning
Habibi, M., Verbeke, P., Senoussi, M., & Braem, S. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.28 · Cited by 3
Asymmetric prefrontal representations for leader–follower dynamics
Cheng, Y., Chen, Y., Kwak, M., Kempner, R. P., Singha, R. G., Winslow, J., Liu, R., Khan, U., Spangler, T., Khan, A., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10900-1 · Cited by 4
Generative Environment-Representation Instance-Based Learning: A Cognitive Model
Malloy, T., Du, Y., Fang, F., & González, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27696 · Cited by 2
Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Based on Driver’s Cognitive Mechanism
Jin, L., Huang, T., Deng, Z., & Huang, S. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3600493 · Cited by 2
Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategiesPreprint
Schultner, D. T., Molleman, L., & Lindström, B. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zm7ta · Cited by 2
Pettine, W. W., Winters, D. E., Murray, J. D., Anticevic, A., & Jacob, S. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n32gy · Cited by 2
Representation of sensorimotor states in mouse medial prefrontal cortexPreprint
Kvitsiani, D., López-Yépez, J. S., Barta, A., Moltesen, M., Martin, J., Woo, T.-F., & Hulme, O. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2389438/v1
Lightweight Face Pose Estimation Multi-task Model Based On Rotation Matrix
Ge, G., & Fu, Y. (2022) · International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST) · doi:10.1109/iaecst57965.2022.10062215
Learning generalizable representations through efficient codingPreprint
Fang, Z., & Sims, C. R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3mx76
An inductive bias for slowly changing features in human reinforcement learningPreprint
Hedrich, N. L., Schulz, E., Hall-McMaster, S., & Schuck, N. W. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.24.576910
Attention and learning strategies reveal distinct profiles of psychiatric traitsPreprint
Pettine, W. W., Tseng, A., Yang, A., Docherty, A. R., Redish, A. D., Murray, J. D., & Jacob, S. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/52mkw · Cited by 1
Computational Models of Hippocampal Cognitive Function
Bush, D., & Burgess, N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190065324.003.0016
Waroquier, F., Jansen, J., Deschuyteneer, N., & Watelet, J. (2025) · Romanian Journal of Military Medicine · doi:10.55453/rjmm.2025.128.4.5
Interpreting the Structure of Multi-object Representations in Vision Encoders
Khajuria, T., Dias, B. O., Domnich, M., & Aru, J. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08324-1_16 · Cited by 2
A Dharmakīrtian Model of Relevance Realization in Cognitive Agents
Amir, N., & Dunne, J. D. (2025) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2025.2564476 · Cited by 1
Attentional Mechanisms for Learning Feature Combinations
Fernandez, K. A., & Lyu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0784-25.2025
Extending cognitive maps from navigation to language learning
Pan, S., & Wong, P. C. M. (2026) · Trends Open · doi:10.1016/j.treopn.2026.07.014
Understanding Goal Selection Through Human Limitations
Byers, J. B., & Niv, Y. (2026) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.70085
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Radulescu, A., Shin, Y. S., & Niv, Y.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-07-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-273
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- PMC
- PMC9707489
- OpenAlex
- W3138639721
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH119511, R21MH120798)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1, W911NF1410101, W911NF)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- representation learning, attention, memory, statistical inference, information selection, belief updating, human decision-making, social decision-making, goal-directed learning, experiential learning
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Cognition, Humans, Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review