CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 735Innovative Education and Learning PracticesOrganizational Learning and LeadershipHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 195 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace

Noe, Raymond A., Clarke, Alena D.M., Klein, Howard J.·2014·Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human capital resources are key for organizations to gain a competitive advantage. Learning based on formal training and development programs, informal learning, and knowledge sharing influences the development of human capital resources. This article provides a selective review of research on learning that occurs in many different forms and at the individual, team, and organizational levels. It is organized around five themes—thinking differently about learning, reconsidering the form and design of learning, facilitating learning in the workplace, expanding the scope of learning outcomes, and improving methodology in learning research. These themes provide a framework for understanding how learning can contribute to the development of human capital resources and organizations’ competitive advantage. For each theme, relevant research is reviewed, and limitations and future research directions are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321

Cites

195 of 195 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Aguinis H, 2012, J. Manag., 38, 932
  2. Bandura A. 1962. Social learning through imitation. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation , ed. MR Jones, pp. 211–74. Lincoln: Univ. Neb. Press
  3. Bear DJ, 2008, Tapping the Potential of Informal Learning: An ASTD Research Study
  4. Becker BE, 2006, J. Manag., 32, 898
  5. Benson G, 1997, Train. Dev., 51, 93
  6. Blume BD, 2010, J. Manag., 36, 1065
  7. Chadwick IC, 2013, J. Manag.
  8. Dobrow SR, 2012, J. Manag., 38, 210
  9. Foss NJ, 2011, J. Manag., 37, 1413
  10. Galagan P, 2010, T+D, 64, 44
  11. Gilson LL, 2004, J. Manag., 30, 453
  12. Gong Y, 2012, J. Manag., 38, 1611
  13. Kostopoulos KC, 2013, J. Manag., 39, 1430
  14. Kukenberger MR, 2012, J. Manag.
  15. Lepak DP, 2002, J. Manag., 28, 517
  16. Roy JN, 2010, T+D, 10, 23
  17. Tannenbaum SI, 2002, Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development, 10
  18. Toossi M, 2009, Mon. Labor Rev., 132, 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2014-03-21
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
245-275
ISSN
  • 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0616
DOI
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
OpenAlex
W2114739796
Semantic Scholar
f3218b2c1fae7499d1789608d1b1f3375cc90265
Cited by
539
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
workplace learning, human capital, competitive advantage, informal learning, knowledge sharing, learning outcomes, learning facilitation, learning design, team learning, organizational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review