Cited by 1,959Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

The formation of learning sets.

Harlow, Harry F.·1949·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0062474

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harlow (1949) found that monkeys adapted their learning strategies after sufficiently many interactions with tasks that shared a common structure, showing a learning-to-learn effect.

    “He found that they adapted their learning strategies after sufficiently many interactions with tasks that shared a common structure, thereby showing a learning-to-learn effect.”

    From Meta-learned models of cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Harlow, 1949

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harlow, H. F.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Harlow, Harry F.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1949
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
51-65
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2092387347
Cited by
1,959
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 28
FWCI
26.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
learning sets, associative learning, stimulus-response associations
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review