The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brain and Salivary Gland Tumors and Mobile Phone Use: Evaluating the Evidence from Various Epidemiological Study Designs
Abstract
Mobile phones (MPs) are the most relevant source of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure to the brain and the salivary gland. Whether this exposure implies a cancer risk has been addressed in several case-control and few cohort studies. A meta-analysis of these studies does not show increased risks for meningioma, pituitary, and salivary gland tumors. For glioma and acoustic neuroma, the results are heterogeneous, with few case-control studies reporting substantially increased risks. However, these elevated risks are not coherent with observed incidence time trends, which are considered informative for this specific topic owing to the steep increase in MP use, the availability of virtually complete cancer registry data from many countries, and the limited number of known competing environmental risk factors. In conclusion, epidemiological studies do not suggest increased brain or salivary gland tumor risk with MP use, although some uncertainty remains regarding long latency periods (>15 years), rare brain tumor subtypes, and MP usage during childhood.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This was an a-priori choice, moti- vated by our knowledge of the available epidemiological studies on mobile phone use and risk of CNS tumours, and of the bias affecting many previous meta-analyses (i.e., improper study aggregation, result- ing in multiple counting of individual data) which often included primary studies and pooled analyses of the former (Roosli et al., 2019).”
From The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies - Part I: Most researched outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as Roosli et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 123
- Ahlbom A, 2015, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 3793
- 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00018 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20651 · DOI
- 10.1186/1476-069X-11-35 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djr244 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70147-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.25765 · DOI
- 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.11.5857 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.29274 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyt072 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyt186 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.jea.7500390 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djr285 · DOI
- Bortkiewicz A, 2017, Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health, 30, 27
- 10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1136/oemed-2011-100155 · DOI
- 10.3892/or.2015.3930 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20119 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.010 · DOI
- 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.776 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11910-007-0032-4 · DOI
- 10.1136/oemed-2013-101754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.019 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20648 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182448295 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jnci/djp415 · DOI
- Ding LX, 2011, Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 12, 3319
- 10.4103/2152-7806.90696 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.282.19.1814-a · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037 · DOI
- 10.1289/EHP2427 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.d6387 · DOI
- 10.1109/TWC.2009.12.080758 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2018.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kww082 · DOI
- 10.3171/2012.5.GKS12615 · DOI
- 10.3892/ijo_00000307 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph120403793 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pathophys.2014.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00420-006-0088-5 · DOI
- Hardell L, 2006, Int. J. Oncol., 28, 509
- 10.3892/ijo.2013.2111 · DOI
- 10.3892/ijo.2013.2025 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.2003.011262 · DOI
- 10.1097/00008469-200208000-00010 · DOI
- Hardell L, 1999, Int. J. Oncol., 15, 113
- IARC Work. Group Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum., 2013, Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
- ICNIRP (Int. Comm. Non-Ioniz. Radiat. Prot.)., 1998, Health Phys, 74, 494
- 10.1093/neuonc/noq077 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM200101113440201 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyq079 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2288-9-36 · DOI
- 10.1111/1753-6405.12338 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/jes.2016.73 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djr077 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182625a6e · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.21829 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.22503 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1038/bjc.2011.344 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwr071 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.151 · DOI
- 10.1002/cam4.1757 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.e1147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aje/kwj242 · DOI
- McCarthy BJ, 2013, J. Registry Manag., 40, 32
- 10.1667/RR1726.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1111/coa.12056 · DOI
- Miranda-Filho A, 2017, Neuro Oncol, 19, 270
- 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.034 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwx157 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.284.23.3001 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000194218.79519.ea · DOI
- 10.1093/jjco/hyq204 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11102-018-0869-3 · DOI
- NTP (Natl. Toxicol. Program)., 2018, Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in B6C3F1/N mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones
- NTP (Natl. Toxicol. Program)., 2018, Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones
- 10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_1 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00193 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006354 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20710 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000058 · DOI
- Philips A, 2018, J. Environ. Public Health, 2018, 7910754
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.110 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10072-017-2850-8 · DOI
- PTS (Post Telecom Auth.)., 2011, The Swedish Post and Telecom Agency: statistics portal
- 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20716 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61346-9 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.cej.0000203618.61936.cd · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.008 · DOI
- Rothman KJ, 1998, Modern Epidemiology
- 10.1093/aje/kwm325 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00124 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20616 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.21982 · DOI
- 10.1002/pbc.22585 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31819c7ba8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1403494809341096 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djj464 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.20297 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwr112 · DOI
- 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1045624 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825988fa · DOI
- 10.1186/1476-069X-10-106 · DOI
- 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328351c6bc · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lpm.2009.06.020 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604214 · DOI
- 10.3109/09553001003734501 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1038/jes.2008.27 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.2004.019281 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.jes.7500509 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.2008.043380 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.006 · DOI
- 10.4103/0973-1482.200759 · DOI
- 10.5620/eht.e2015015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karipidis, K., Baaken, D., Loney, T., Blettner, M., Brzozek, C., Elwood, M., Narh, C., Orsini, N., Röösli, M., Paulo, M. S., et al. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Röösli, M., Lagorio, S., Schoemaker, M. J., Schüz, J., & Feychting, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051 Basel, Switzerland;
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 69372 Lyon, France
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Venue
- Annual Review of Public Health
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-238
- ISSN
- 0163-7525
- 1545-2093
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review