Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time Allocation: A Tool For the Study of Cultural Behavior

Gross, D R·1984·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

Time allocation studies diffuse rapidly among anthropologists as the problems they treat require an accurate , detailed technique for observing and recording human behavior in context (74, 152). Time-allocation (henceforth TA) techni­ ques are well established in other social science disciplines as well as in engineering and management science (48, 161, 218, 228). Sociologists have relied heavily on self-kept time diaries on relatively large samples to build up time-budget data. Anthropologists who have explored the technique tend to rely more often on observation . T A studies provide a tool with which to examine a multitude of questions. TA measures the behavioral output of decisions, preferences, and attitudes. It provides a measure of role perform­ ance. It measures the rates at which goods are produced. TA provides primary data on many kinds of social interaction and provides the basis for defining social groups by behavior. T A can provide important data in studies of atti­ tudes, values, cultural style, and emotions. Any kind of behavior with an observable environmental effect can be observed using T A techniques, includ­ ing speaking, working, repose , leisure , etc . TA is useful in many kinds of comparative studies: cross-cultural , interethnic cross-sectional, and longitu­ dinal (see 100). It provides a basis for describing and analyzing intracultural variation--even individual variation-seasonal , diurnal , ecological, and other kinds of variation . Because it is replicable, the TA approach allows ethno­ graphers to achieve the same reliability as empirical techniques in the other natural sciences . T A provides for a microscopically detailed behavioral record from which to construct higher order cultural units (115) including social units, ethnic units, modes of production, and evolutionary stages. The observational rules implied

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002511

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Gross, D. R.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
1984-10
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
519-558
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W2174111886
Cited by
174
References
4
FWCI
46.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Allocation: A Tool For the Study of Cultural Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002511
The paper
Gross, D. R. (1984). Time Allocation: A Tool For the Study of Cultural Behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.