Cited by 417Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The Three-Phase Interstellar Medium Revisited

Cox, Donald P.·2005·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

▪ Abstract The interstellar medium in the vicinity of the Sun is arranged in large-scale structures of bubble walls, sheets, and filaments of warm gas, within which close to the midplane there are subsheets and filaments of cold dense material; the whole occupies roughly half the available volume and extends with decreasing mean density to at least a kiloparsec off the plane. The remainder of the volume is in bubble interiors, cavities, and tunnels of much lower density, with some but not all of those lower density regions hot enough to be observable via their X-ray emission. This entire system is pervaded by a rather strong and irregular magnetic field and cosmic rays, the pressures of which are confined by the weight of the interstellar gas, particularly that far from the plane where gravity is strong. Observations suggest that the cosmic rays and magnetic field have an even more extended vertical distribution than the warm gas, requiring either the weight of additional coronal material or magnetic tension to confine it to the disk. Adjusting one's perception of this medium to embrace the known aspects is difficult. After this adjustment, there are many problems to solve and prejudices to overcome—the weak role of thermal instability, the suppression of certain gravitational instabilities, the problem of determining the state in the low-density regions, the twin difficulties of not having too much OVI (O+5) and getting enough diffuse 3/4 keV X-ray emission, the possible importance of large old-barrel–shaped supernova remnants in clarifying matters, the possible role of dust evolution in adjusting the heating to make clouds stable, the factors influencing the magnitudes of the interstellar pressure and scale height—things that global models of the medium might examine to clarify some of these matters; attention to these details and more constitute the challenge of this subject.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150615

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Cox, Donald P.
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
337-385
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2163677272
Cited by
417
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
interstellar medium, warm gas, cold dense gas, interstellar bubbles, interstellar magnetic field, cosmic rays, interstellar pressure, thermal instability, gravitational instability, diffuse X-ray emission, supernova remnants, dust evolution, interstellar heating, solar neighborhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review