The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS AND IONIC PORES IN MEMBRANES
Abstract
This review describes recent progress in the analysis of statistical fluctuations in membrane conductance. The discussion is limited to cases where noise analysis was performed for the sake of obtaining information about the molecular properties of the membrane constituents and, therefore, does not cover work concerned with systems analysis that uses noise driving. The presentation is divided into two parts. The first part begins with a simplified treatment of the mathematical theory, based on the restrictive assumption that ionic channels open and close independently and can exist in only two states (open and closed). This minimal mathematical theory provides the basis for making certain kinds of inferences about the properties of single channels in artificial biJayers and post junctional synaptic membranes. Specifically, in these relatively simple instances, analysis of conductance fluctuations can give estimates of two important channel characteristics, the mean length of time a channel remains open and the conduc tance of its open state. The second part treats the mathematical basis for fluctuation analysis from a more general point of view without the restrictions imposed in the simplified development: channels are permitted to have more than two states. In this part, the analysis is extended to include inferences beyond those involving simply amplitude and duration as discussed in the first part, and we stress the relation between the kinetics of channel gating as revealed by fluctuation analysis and the relaxation kinetics measured in standard voltage clamp experiments. The extended theory provides the background for surveying applications of fluctuation analysis to more complicated situations in the pharmacologically modified postsynaptic mem brane and in gating of sodium and potassium channels of axons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sodium and calcium channels in bovine chromaffin cells
Fenwick, E. M., Marty, A., & Neher, E. (1982) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014394 · Cited by 961
Self-citationZweifach, A., & Lewis, R. S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.13.6295 · Cited by 760
Control of GluR1 AMPA receptor function by cAMP-dependent protein kinase
Banke, T. G., Bowie, D., Lee, H.-K., Huganir, R. L., Schousboe, A., & Traynelis, S. F. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-01-00089.2000 · Cited by 652
Study, R. E., & Barker, J. L. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.11.7180 · Cited by 561
The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations.
Adams, D. J., Dwyer, T. M., & Hille, B. (1980) · The Journal of general physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.75.5.493 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Neher, E., & Stevens, C. F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 345-381
- ISSN
- 0084-6589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992539915
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS AND IONIC PORES IN MEMBRANES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.002021
- The paper
- Neher, E., & Stevens, C. F. (1977). CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATIONS AND IONIC PORES IN MEMBRANES. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.002021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.