The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TARGET SITE SELECTION IN TRANSPOSITION
Abstract
Transposable elements are discrete mobile DNA segments that can insert into nonhomologous target sites. Diverse patterns of target site selectivity are observed: Some elements display considerable target site selectivity and others display little obvious selectivity, although none appears to be truly “random.” A variety of mechanisms for target site selection are used: Some elements use direct interactions between the recombinase and target DNA whereas other elements depend upon interactions with accessory proteins that communicate both with the target DNA and the recombinase. The study of target site selectivity is useful in probing recombination mechanisms, in studying genome structure and function, and also in providing tools for genome manipulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences
Xiong, Y., & Eickbush, T. H. (1990) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07536.x · Cited by 1,374
Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139
Dyda, F., Hickman, A. B., Jenkins, T. M., Engelman, A., Craigie, R., & Davies, D. R. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7801124 · Cited by 810
HIV-1 DNA integration: Mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer
Engelman, A., Mizuuchi, K., & Craigie, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90297-c · Cited by 655
Retroviral DNA integration: structure of an integration intermediate
Fujiwara, T., & Mizuuchi, K. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90071-2 · Cited by 385
Pryciak, P. M., & Varmus, H. E. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90289-o · Cited by 273
Luan, D. D., & Eickbush, T. H. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.7.3882 · Cited by 219
Müller, H. P., & Varmus, H. E. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06794.x · Cited by 202
The influence of DNA and nucleosome structure on integration events directed by HIV integrase
Pruss, D., Reeves, R., Bushman, F. D., & Wolffe, A. P. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)31494-1 · Cited by 173
Efficient autointegration of avian retrovirus DNA in vitro
Lee, Y. M., & Coffin, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.64.12.5958-5965.1990 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Bennett, P. M. (2008) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607 · Cited by 893
Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and its implications for the evolution of the immune system
Agrawal, A., Eastman, Q. M., & Schatz, D. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29457 · Cited by 811
Transposable Elements, Epigenetics, and Genome Evolution
Fedoroff, N. V. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.338.6108.758 · Cited by 634
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Hiom, K., Melek, M., & Gellert, M. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81587-1 · Cited by 534
Matzke, M. A., Mette, M. F., & Matzke, A. J. M. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006484806925 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, N. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 437-474
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W2140206032
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TARGET SITE SELECTION IN TRANSPOSITION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.437
- The paper
- Craig, N. L. (1997). TARGET SITE SELECTION IN TRANSPOSITION. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
