Cited by 989Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability

Bulmer, M. G.·1971·The American Naturalist

Abstract

If a metric character is determined by an effectively infinite number of loci, selection cannot cause any permanent change in the genetic variance but will cause a temporary change which is rapidly reversed when selection ceases. This change is due entirely to the correlation between pairs of loci which is induced by selection; the correlation is negative, leading to a reduction in the genetic variance under stabilizing or directional selection, and is positive, leading to an increase in the variance under disruptive selection. When selection ceases, the correlation rapidly disappears as joint equilibrium at pairs of loci is reestablished, and the variance returns to its original value. An expression is derived for the predicted amount of change in the genetic variance due to disequilibrium in the absence of linkage. The change is likely to be small under selection intensities found under natural conditions, but it may be appreciable under intense artificial selection. This limiting result shows that the magnitude of any permanent change in the variance due to selection must decrease as the number of loci involved increases and that, when the number of loci is large, it is likely to be much less than the temporary change due to disequilibrium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282718

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is plausible that the deflation of population effects we observed for 9 phenotypes is due in part to ascertainment bias, although natural selection may also contribute through negative LD induced between sign-concordant causal alleles, consistent with the Bulmer effect.

    “It is therefore plausible that the deflation of population effects we observed for 9 phenotypes is due in part to ascertainment bias, although natural selection (specifically, directional or stabilizing selection) may also contribute through negative LD induced between sign-concordant causal alleles, consistent with the Bulmer effect28.”
  • Because disease reduces fitness, variants that promote disease should be selected against and therefore should not be common.

    “Since disease is deleterious to fitness, variants that promote disease should be selected against, and hence disease-promoting variants should not be common3,26,27.”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bulmer, M. G.
Corresponding author
Bulmer, M. G.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1971-05
Volume
105
Issue
943
Pages
201-211
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1965190303
Cited by
989
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
genetic variance, selection, stabilizing selection, directional selection, diversifying selection, selective breeding, number of loci, quantitative genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review