The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulation of B-Cell Growth and Differentiation by Soluble Factors
Abstract
The B-lymphocyte family of cells presents one of the most remarkable opportunities for the detailed study of regulation of growth and differentiation. Some members of this cell population have the property that they may be stimulated by ligand-receptor interactions, together with the sequential action of a series of lymphokines, to progress from the resting state, through several rounds of proliferation, and then to differentiate to immunoglobulin secretion. Other cells in this group participate in cognate cellular interactions with helper T cells in which the recognition of both antigen and a class II MHC molecule on the B-cell surface is key to activation. The differentiation of these cells is also controlled by soluble products. We have reviewed our developing knowledge of the biochemistry and mode of action of the lymphokines that act upon B cells. These include distinct growth and differentiation factors. Among these are the BCGFs of mice and humans and the various TRFs, which include molecules often described as differentiation factors. The next several years should witness major progress in understanding the physicochemical properties of the B cell-specific factors, their time and nature of action, and the nature of their receptors. In addition, we can anticipate a major effort to understand the intracellular events that flow from the action of specific growth and differentiation factors that act upon B cells. Such information should lead to a new physiologically-based pharmacology for manipulation of antibody responses in human disease and in responses to vaccines. In addition, the fuller understanding of the nature and mode of action of the various growth and differentiation factors should make long-term growth of cloned B cells a procedure that can be routinely used in immunological laboratories for the precise study of the biology of responses by homogeneous populations of B lymphocytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alternative Activation of Macrophages: An Immunologic Functional Perspective
Martinez, F. O., Helming, L., & Gordon, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532 · Cited by 2,745
Hirano, T., Yasukawa, K., Harada, H., Taga, T., Watanabe, Y., Matsuda, T., Kashiwamura, S.-I., Nakajima, K., Koyama, K., Iwamatsu, A., et al. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/324073a0 · Cited by 2,139
Muraguchi, A., Hirano, T., Tang, B., Matsuda, T., Horii, Y., Nakajima, K., & Kishimoto, T. (1988) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.167.2.332 · Cited by 783
Interleukin-6 and its receptor: a paradigm for cytokines
Kishimoto, T., Akira, S., & Taga, T. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1411569 · Cited by 665
Expression of interleukin 2 receptors on activated human B cells.
Waldmann, T. A., Goldman, C. K., Robb, R. J., Depper, J. M., Leonard, W. J., Sharrow, S. O., Bongiovanni, K. F., Korsmeyer, S. J., & Greene, W. C. (1984) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.160.5.1450 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, M., & Paul, W. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Immunology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-327
- ISSN
- 0732-0582 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3278
- OpenAlex
- W2123369755
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of B-Cell Growth and Differentiation by Soluble Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.001515
- The paper
- Howard, M., & Paul, W. E. (1983). Regulation of B-Cell Growth and Differentiation by Soluble Factors. Annual Review of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.01.040183.001515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.