The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuroanatomy of Memory
Abstract
Three important developments have occurred in the area of during the past decade. The first was the recognition that there is more than one kind of (Cohen 1984; Schacter 1987; Squire 1982; Tulving 1985). Declarative (or, explicit memory) affords the capacity for con scious recollections about facts and events. This is the kind of that is usually referred to when the terms memory or remembering are used in ordinary language. Declarative can be contrasted with nondeclarative (or implicit) memory, a heterogeneous collection of nonconscious abilities that includes the learning of skills and habits, prim ing, and some forms of classical conditioning. In these cases, experience cumulates in behavioral change, but without affording access to any content. The distinction between declarative and nondeclarative is fundamental, because it has turned out that different kinds of are supported by different brain systems. The second important development was the establishment of an animal model of human amnesia in the monkey (Mahut & Moss 1984; Mishkin 1982; Squire & Zola-Morgan 1983). In the 1950s, Scoville & Milner (1957) described the severe amnesia that followed bilateral surgical removal of the medial temporal lobe (patient H.M.). This important case demon strated that is a distinct cerebral function, dissociable from other perceptual and cognitive abilities. Subsequently, surgical lesions of the medial temporai iobe in monkeys, which approximated the damage sus tained by patient H.M., were shown to reproduce many features of human impairment . In particular, both monkeys and humans were
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
Self-citationThe Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
Self-citationImplicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · cited 1×
“The first was the recognition that there is more than one kind of memory (Cohen 1984; Schacter 1987; Squire 1982; Tulving 1985).”
BackgroundModality-Specific Retrograde Amnesia of Fear
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585183 · Cited by 2,483
Alzheimer's disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation.
Hyman, B. T., Van Hoesen, G. W., Damasio, A. R., & Barnes, C. L. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6474172 · Cited by 2,268
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-02950.1986 · Cited by 1,997
Self-citationMesulam, M. ‐., Mufson, E. J., Levey, A. I., & Wainer, B. H. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902140206 · Cited by 1,962
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
How many memory systems are there?
Tulving, E. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.385 · Cited by 1,909
Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232 · Cited by 1,282 · cited 5×
“For example, whereas one early suggestion concerned differences in the rate of forgetting in long-term memory, McKee & Squire (1992) recently demonstrated that amnesic patients with confirmed medial temporal obe lesions or diencephalic lesions have virtually identical forgetting rates for…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology
Braak, H., Ghebremedhin, E., Rüb, U., Bratzke, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2004) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-004-0956-9 · Cited by 2,689
Synaptic Plasticity: Multiple Forms, Functions, and Mechanisms
Citri, A., & Malenka, R. C. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301559 · Cited by 2,323
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
A neostriatal habit learning system in humans
Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5280.1399 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 547-563
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- OpenAlex
- W2165646866
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroanatomy of Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002555
- The paper
- Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. R. (1993). Neuroanatomy of Memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.