Cited by 1,415Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple Dopamine Functions at Different Time Courses

Schultz, Wolfram·2007·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

Many lesion studies report an amazing variety of deficits in behavioral functions that cannot possibly be encoded in great detail by the relatively small number of midbrain dopamine neurons. Although hoping to unravel a single dopamine function underlying these phenomena, electrophysiological and neurochemical studies still give a confusing, mutually exclusive, and partly contradictory account of dopamine's role in behavior. However, the speed of observed phasic dopamine changes varies several thousand fold, which offers a means to differentiate the behavioral relationships according to their time courses. Thus dopamine is involved in mediating the reactivity of the organism to the environment at different time scales, from fast impulse responses related to reward via slower changes with uncertainty, punishment, and possibly movement to the tonic enabling of postsynaptic motor, cognitive, and motivational systems deficient in Parkinson's disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135722

Cites

201 of 201 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 201 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carlsson A, 1958, Science, 471, 127
  2. 10.1037//0033-295X.87.6.532 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Schwab RS, 1972, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl., 31, 87
  4. 10.1037//0033-295X.88.2.135 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.031374698 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,415

Metadata

Authors
Schultz, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Wolfram
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
259-288
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2096193724
Cited by
1,415
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 85
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (095495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dopamine, midbrain dopaminergic neurons, reward, uncertainty, punishment, motor control, cognitive function, motivation, Parkinson's disease, behavioral deficits, lesion studies
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Decision Making, Dopamine, Humans, Movement, Movement Disorders, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review