Cited by 260Coffee research and impactsGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressNatural Products and Biological Research

THE CHOLESTEROL-RAISING FACTOR FROM COFFEE BEANS

Open access
Urgert, R., Katan, M. B.·1997·Annual Review of Nutrition

Abstract

▪ Abstract Some coffee brewing techniques raise the serum concentration of total and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol in humans, whereas others do not. The responsible factors are the diterpene lipids cafestol and kahweol, which make up about 1% (wt:wt) of coffee beans. Diterpenes are extracted by hot water but are retained by a paper filter. This explains why filtered coffee does not affect cholesterol, whereas Scandinavian “boiled,” cafetiere, and Turkish coffees do. We describe the identification of the cholesterol-raising factors, their effects on blood levels of lipids and liver function enzymes, and their impact on public health, based on papers published up to December 1996.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.305

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urgert, R., & Katan, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, Bomenweg 2, Wageningen, 6703 HD, The Netherlands
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Annual Review of Nutrition
Published
1997-07
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
305-324
ISSN
  • 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4312
OpenAlex
W2100121015
Cited by
260
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
Keywords
coffee, cafestol, kahweol, LDL cholesterol, serum cholesterol, coffee brewing methods, filtered coffee, boiled coffee, Turkish coffee, liver enzymes, lipid metabolism
MeSH terms
Animals, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Diterpenes, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Infant, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review