Cited by 146Electrolyte and hormonal disordersCardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The Basic and Clinical Pharmacology of Nonpeptide Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists

Thibonnier, M, Coles, P, Thibonnier, A, Shoham, M·2001·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

The neurohypophysial hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a cyclic nonpeptide whose actions are mediated by the stimulation of specific G protein–coupled membrane receptors pharmacologically classified into V 1-vascular (V 1 R), V 2-renal (V 2 R) and V 3-pituitary (V 3 R) AVP receptor subtypes. The random screening of chemical compounds and optimization of lead compounds recently resulted in the development of orally active nonpeptide AVP receptor antagonists. Potential therapeutic uses of AVP receptor antagonists include (a) the blockade of V 1-vascular AVP receptors in arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease; (b) the blockade of V 2-renal AVP receptors in the syndrome of inappropriate vasopressin secretion, congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and any state of excessive retention of free water and subsequent dilutional hyponatremia; (c) the blockade of V 3-pituitary AVP receptors in adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors. The pharmacological and clinical profile of orally active nonpeptide vasopressin receptor antagonists is reviewed here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.175

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thibonnier, M., Coles, P., Thibonnier, A., & Shoham, M.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2001-04
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
175-202
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2104748479
Cited by
146
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
vasopressin receptor antagonists, vasopressin, V1 receptor, V2 receptor, G protein-coupled receptors, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, hyponatremia, hypertension, congestive heart failure, drug development
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Receptors, Vasopressin, Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review