The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibition of Carcinogenesis by Tea
Abstract
Tea has received a great deal of attention because tea polyphenols are strong antioxidants, and tea preparations have inhibitory activity against tumorigenesis. The bioavailability and biotransformation of tea polyphenols, however, are key factors limiting these activities in vivo. The inhibition of tumorigenesis by green or black tea preparations has been demonstrated in animal models on different organ sites such as skin, lung, oral cavity, esophagus, forestomach, stomach, small intestine, colon, pancreas, and mammary gland. Epidemiological studies, however, have not yielded clear conclusions concerning the protective effects of tea consumption against cancer formation in humans. The discrepancy between the results from humans and animal models could be due to 1) the much higher doses of tea used in animals in comparison to human consumption, 2) the differences in causative factors between the cancers in humans and animals, and 3) confounding factors limiting the power of epidemiological studies to detect an effect. It is possible that tea may be only effective against specific types of cancer caused by certain etiological factors. Many mechanisms have been proposed for the inhibition of carcinogenesis by tea, including the modulation of signal transduction pathways that leads to the inhibition of cell proliferation and transformation, induction of apoptosis of preneoplastic and neoplastic cells, as well as inhibition of tumor invasion and angiogenesis. These mechanisms need to be evaluated and verified in animal models or humans in order to gain more understanding on the effect of tea consumption on human cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gensler, H. L., Timmermann, B. N., Valcic, S., Wächter, G. A., Dorr, R., Dvorakova, K., & Alberts, D. S. (1996) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589609514488 · Cited by 133
Lou, Y.-R., Lu, Y.-P., Xie, J.-G., Huang, M.-T., & Conney, A. H. (1999) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1207/s15327914nc330205 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases
Scalbert, A., Manach, C., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., & Jiménez, L. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/1040869059096 · Cited by 2,999
Targeting Multiple Signaling Pathways by Green Tea Polyphenol (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate
Khan, N., Afaq, F., Saleem, M., Ahmad, N., & Mukhtar, H. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3636 · Cited by 820
Tea Polyphenols in Promotion of Human Health
Khan, N., & Mukhtar, H. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11010039 · Cited by 784
Cutaneous photodamage, oxidative stress, and topical antioxidant protection
Pinnell, S. R. (2003) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.16 · Cited by 544
The chemistry and biotransformation of tea constituents
Sang, S., Lambert, J. D., Ho, C.-T., & Yang, C. S. (2011) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2011.02.007 · Cited by 492
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, C. S., Maliakal, P., & Meng, X.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-54
- ISSN
- 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4304
- OpenAlex
- W2614443566
- Cited by
- 939
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.