The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QUANTITATIVE OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR TISSUE DIAGNOSIS
Abstract
▪ Abstract The interaction of light within tissue has been used to recognize disease since the mid-1800s. The recent developments of small light sources, detectors, and fiber optic probes provide opportunities to quantitatively measure these interactions, which yield information for diagnosis at the biochemical, structural, or (patho)physiological level within intact tissues. However, because of the strong scattering properties of tissues, the reemitted optical signal is often influenced by changes in biochemistry (as detected by these spectroscopic approaches) and by physiological and pathophysiological changes in tissue scattering. One challenge of biomedical optics is to uncouple the signals influenced by biochemistry, which themselves provide specificity for identifying diseased states, from those influenced by tissue scattering, which are typically unspecific to a pathology. In this review, we describe optical interactions pursued for biomedical applications (fluorescence, fluorescence lifetime, phosphorescence, and Raman from cells, cultures, and tissues) and then provide a descriptive framework for light interaction based upon tissue absorption and scattering properties. Finally, we review important endogenous and exogenous biological chromophores and describe current work to employ these signals for detection and diagnosis of disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of the optical properties of biological tissues
Cheong, W. F., Prahl, S. A., & Welch, A. J. (1990) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.64354 · Cited by 2,530
Cited by
Prospects for in vivo Raman spectroscopy
Hanlon, E. B., Manoharan, R., Koo, T.-W., Shafer, K. E., Motz, J. T., Fitzmaurice, M., Kramer, J. R., Itzkan, I., Dasari, R. R., & Feld, M. S. (2000) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/201 · Cited by 894
Cell and tissue autofluorescence research and diagnostic applications
Monici, M. (2005) · Biotechnology Annual Review · doi:10.1016/s1387-2656(05)11007-2 · Cited by 887
Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., & Pöschl, U. (2012) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-5-37-2012 · Cited by 394
Translation of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Technologies: Emerging Clinical Applications
Sevick-Muraca, E. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-070910-083323 · Cited by 339
Self-citationOptical Imaging Using Endogenous Contrast to Assess Metabolic State
Georgakoudi, I., & Quinn, K. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150108 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards-Kortum, R., & Sevick-Muraca, E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 555-606
- ISSN
- 0066-426X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1593
- OpenAlex
- W2156099567
- Cited by
- 1,172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QUANTITATIVE OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR TISSUE DIAGNOSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.physchem.47.1.555
- The paper
- Richards-Kortum, R., & Sevick-Muraca, E. (1996). QUANTITATIVE OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR TISSUE DIAGNOSIS. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.47.1.555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.