The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CNG AND HCN CHANNELS: Two Peas, One Pod
Abstract
▪ Abstract Cyclic nucleotide–activated ion channels play a fundamental role in a variety of physiological processes. By opening in response to intracellular cyclic nucleotides, they translate changes in concentrations of signaling molecules to changes in membrane potential. These channels belong to two families: the cyclic nucleotide–gated (CNG) channels and the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide–modulated (HCN) channels. The two families exhibit high sequence similarity and belong to the superfamily of voltage-gated potassium channels. Whereas HCN channels are activated by voltage and CNG channels are virtually voltage independent, both channels are activated by cyclic nucleotide binding. Furthermore, the channels are thought to have similar channel structures, leading to similar mechanisms of activation by cyclic nucleotides. However, although these channels are structurally and behaviorally similar, they have evolved to perform distinct physiological functions. This review describes the physiological roles and biophysical behavior of CNG and HCN channels. We focus on how similarities in structure and activation mechanisms result in common biophysical models, allowing CNG and HCN channels to be viewed as a single genre.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model
Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J.-P. (1965) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6 · Cited by 8,825
The Structure of the Potassium Channel: Molecular Basis of K + Conduction and Selectivity
Doyle, D. A., Cabral, J. M., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., & MacKinnon, R. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.69 · Cited by 6,807
Ion Channels/Excitable Membranes
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_33998 · Cited by 4,034
Induction by cyclic GMP of cationic conductance in plasma membrane of retinal rod outer segment
Fesenko, E. E., Kolesnikov, S. S., & Lyubarsky, A. L. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/313310a0 · Cited by 1,211
Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Ion Channels
Kaupp, U. B., & Seifert, R. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2002 · Cited by 1,143
A family of hyperpolarization-activated mammalian cation channels
Ludwig, A., Zong, X., Jeglitsch, M., Hofmann, F., & Biel, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31255 · Cited by 943
Direct activation of cardiac pacemaker channels by intracellular cyclic AMP
DiFrancesco, D., & Tortora, P. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351145a0 · Cited by 850
Calcium channel characteristics conferred on the sodium channel by single mutations
Heinemann, S. H., Terlau, H., Stühmer, W., Imoto, K., & Numa, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356441a0 · Cited by 784
Contribution of the S4 Segment to Gating Charge in the Shaker K+ Channel
Aggarwal, S. K., & MacKinnon, R. (1996) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80143-9 · Cited by 681
Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal?
Stein, R. B., Gossen, E. R., & Jones, K. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1668 · Cited by 663
Cited by
Role of β-Adrenoceptor Signaling in Skeletal Muscle: Implications for Muscle Wasting and Disease
Lynch, G. S., & Ryall, J. G. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2007 · Cited by 410
Ion channels and signaling in the pituitary gland
Stojilkovic, S. S., Tabak, J., & Bertram, R. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2010-0005 · Cited by 229
Baruscotti, M., Barbuti, A., & Bucchi, A. (2010) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.06.019 · Cited by 149
Sartiani, L., Mannaioni, G., Masi, A., Novella Romanelli, M., & Cerbai, E. (2017) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.014035 · Cited by 143
Baruscotti, M., Bucchi, A., Milanesi, R., Paina, M., Barbuti, A., Gnecchi-Ruscone, T., Bianco, E., Vitali-Serdoz, L., Cappato, R., & DiFrancesco, D. (2017) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv582 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Craven, K. B., & Zagotta, W. N.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 375-401
- ISSN
- 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1585
- OpenAlex
- W2154420009
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CNG AND HCN CHANNELS: Two Peas, One Pod. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.134728
- The paper
- Craven, K. B., & Zagotta, W. N. (2006). CNG AND HCN CHANNELS: Two Peas, One Pod. Annual Review of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.134728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
