Cited by 687Physiological and biochemical adaptationsTardigrade Biology and EcologyAmphibian and Reptile Biology

Hypoxia Tolerance in Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fishes: Life with Variable Oxygen Availability

Bickler, Philip E., Buck, Leslie T.·2007·Annual Review of Physiology

Abstract

The ability of fishes, amphibians, and reptiles to survive extremes of oxygen availability derives from a core triad of adaptations: profound metabolic suppression, tolerance of ionic and pH disturbances, and mechanisms for avoiding free-radical injury during reoxygenation. For long-term anoxic survival, enhanced storage of glycogen in critical tissues is also necessary. The diversity of body morphologies and habitats and the utilization of dormancy have resulted in a broad array of adaptations to hypoxia in lower vertebrates. For example, the most anoxia-tolerant vertebrates, painted turtles and crucian carp, meet the challenge of variable oxygen in fundamentally different ways: Turtles undergo near-suspended animation, whereas carp remain active and responsive in the absence of oxygen. Although the mechanisms of survival in both of these cases include large stores of glycogen and drastically decreased metabolism, other mechanisms, such as regulation of ion channels in excitable membranes, are apparently divergent. Common themes in the regulatory adjustments to hypoxia involve control of metabolism and ion channel conductance by protein phosphorylation. Tolerance of decreased energy charge and accumulating anaerobic end products as well as enhanced antioxidant defenses and regenerative capacities are also key to hypoxia survival in lower vertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.162529

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glassfrogs likely exhibit depressed metabolic activity or nonoxidative metabolic processes.

    “indicating that glassfrogs likely exhibit depressed metabolic activity or nonoxidative metabolic processes”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickler, P. E., & Buck, L. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bickler, Philip E.
Venue
Annual Review of Physiology
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
145-170
ISSN
  • 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1585
OpenAlex
W2139921047
Cited by
687
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 29
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
hypoxia tolerance, anoxia tolerance, reptiles, amphibians, fish, metabolic suppression, glycogen storage, ion channel modulation, protein phosphorylation, antioxidant defense, reoxygenation injury, free radicals, suspended animation, painted turtle, crucian carp, energy charge, anaerobic metabolism, dormancy
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Amphibians, Animals, Hypoxia, Antioxidants, Cold Temperature, Fishes, Hypothermia, Oxygen Consumption, Reptiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review