The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E LECTORAL F RAUD: Causes, Types, and Consequences
Abstract
▪ Abstract This article reviews research on electoral fraud—clandestine and illegal efforts to shape election results. Only a handful of works classify reports on electoral fraud to identify its nature, magnitude, and causes. This review therefore looks at the larger number of historical works (as well as some ethnographies and surveys) that discuss ballot rigging. Its conclusions are threefold. First, fraud takes on a panoply of forms; it ranges from procedural violations of electoral law (that may or may not intend to distort results) to the outright use of violence against voters. Second, even when ballot rigging is an integral part of electoral competition, it is infrequently decisive. Fraud, nevertheless, undermines political stability because, in close races, it can be crucial. Third, political competition shapes the rhythm and nature of electoral fraud. Efforts to steal elections increase with inequality, but competitiveness—which institutions help to shape—determines the ballot-rigging strategies parties adopt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3570 · Cited by 2,372
Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175098 · Cited by 2,172
Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation
Schedler, A. (2002) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0031 · Cited by 1,616
Holmes, W. F., & Kousser, J. M. (1975) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2206040 · Cited by 495
Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case
Cox, G. W., & Kousser, J. M. (1981) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110757 · Cited by 257
The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research
Pastor, R. A. (1999) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510349908403630 · Cited by 245
Democratizing Mexico: public opinion and electoral choices
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1169 · Cited by 235
The elimination of corrupt practices in British elections, 1868-1911
O’Leary, C. (1962) · Cited by 200
Democracy in translation: understanding politics in an unfamiliar culture
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5935 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Eggers, A. C., Fowler, A., Hainmueller, J., Hall, A. B., & Snyder, J. M. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12127 · Cited by 423
Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008
Caughey, D., & Sekhon, J. S. (2011) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr032 · Cited by 331
ZIBLATT, D. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409090042 · Cited by 255
Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy: Citizens, Processes and Outcomes
Daoust, J.-F., & Nadeau, R. (2023) · doi:10.1017/9781009128032 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehoucq, F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 233-256
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2126321299
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E LECTORAL F RAUD: Causes, Types, and Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655
- The paper
- Lehoucq, F. (2003). E LECTORAL F RAUD: Causes, Types, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.