Cited by 7,949Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

Tajfel, H·1982·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

A revolution in the science of emotion has emerged in recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes ...Read More

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7,949

Metadata

Authors
Tajfel, H.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Tajfel, H
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
1982-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2175873029
Cited by
7,949
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 182 · 2025: 309 · 2024: 337 · 2023: 465 · 2022: 377 · 2021: 388 · 2020: 431 · 2019: 414 · 2018: 326 · 2017: 312 · 2016: 334 · 2015: 346 · 2014: 359 · 2013: 324 · 2012: 340
FWCI
92.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
intergroup relations, social psychology, emotions, decision-making, paradigm shift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review