Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expectancies and Interpersonal Processes

Miller, D T, Turnbull, W·1986·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION .. 233 BEHA VIORAL INFLUENCES 234 Self-Ful fil/inE? Prophecies 234 Sel fDis confirming Prophecies 238 MEDIATING LINKS 238 Perceiver Expectancv and Behavior 238 Target Response 241 Summary ......... 243 PRO CESSING TAR GE T BEHAVIOR 244 Perceptual and Behavioral Comhinations 244 Perceptual Confir mation 246 SELF-CONCEPT CHANGE 248 Ps y chologic al Model 249 Sociological Model 250 CONCLUSION 250 Interaction and Coaction Effects 251 Limits of Expectancy Effects 251

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.001313

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
1986-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
233-256
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2153645910
Cited by
391
References
4
FWCI
53.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.