The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).
Open accessAbstract
We review the discovery, characterization, and evolving use of the N400, an event-related brain potential response linked to meaning processing. We describe the elicitation of N400s by an impressive range of stimulus types—including written, spoken, and signed words or pseudowords; drawings, photos, and videos of faces, objects, and actions; sounds; and mathematical symbols—and outline the sensitivity of N400 amplitude (as its latency is remarkably constant) to linguistic and nonlinguistic manipulations. We emphasize the effectiveness of the N400 as a dependent variable for examining almost every aspect of language processing and highlight its expanding use to probe semantic memory and to determine how the neurocognitive system dynamically and flexibly uses bottom-up and top-down information to make sense of the world. We conclude with different theories of the N400's functional significance and offer an N400-inspired reconceptualization of how meaning processing might unfold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“N400 is related to semantic processing that is elicited by various kinds of stimuli, such as words, speech, and pictures (for a review, see Kutas and Federmeier, 2011).”
From Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index (2021) · cites this paper as Kutas and Federmeier, 2011
In the citing paper
“We draw on evidence from an electrophysiological measure that has been shown to be extremely useful for studying the timeline of semantic processing: the N400 (already mentioned in Section 2; for reviews see Hagoort & van Berkum, 2007;Kutas and Federmeier, 2011;van Berkum et al., 2005).”
From Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension (2018) · cites this paper as Kutas and Federmeier, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity
Marta Kutas, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7350657 · Cited by 5,029
Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01560-6 · Cited by 2,124
Self-citationA cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2532 · Cited by 1,779
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
The Handbook of Psycholinguistics
(2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118829516 · Cited by 1,615
Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095455 · Cited by 1,396
Event-related potentials and recognition memory
Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004 · Cited by 1,283
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Marta Kutas, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1504 · Cited by 1,236
Event-related potential studies of attention.
Luck, S., Woodman, G., & Vogel, E. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x · Cited by 1,209
The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x03000104 · Cited by 1,130
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,008
The discontinuity model: Statistical and grammatical learning in adult second-language acquisition
Rastelli, S. (2019) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1080/10489223.2019.1571594 · Cited by 27
An interpretable measure of semantic similarity for predicting eye movements in reading
Sun, K., Qiu-ying, W., & Lu, X. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02240-8 · Cited by 27
Karunathilake, I. M. D., Kulasingham, J. P., & Simon, J. Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2309166120 · Cited by 27
Knoeferle, P., Urbach, T. P., & Marta Kutas, A. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.004 · Cited by 27
Vignali, L., Himmelstoß, N. A., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., & Hutzler, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00191 · Cited by 27
On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation
Delogu, F., Drenhaus, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0766-4 · Cited by 27
Casado, P., Martín‐Loeches, M., León, I., Hernández‐Gutiérrez, D., Espuny, J., Muñoz, F., Jiménez‐Ortega, L., Fondevila, S., & de Vega, M. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.002 · Cited by 29
Dickson, D. S., Cerda, V. R., Beavers, R. N., Ruiz, A., Castaneda, R. R., & Wicha, N. Y. Y. (2018) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13212 · Cited by 27
Bürki, A., Frossard, J., & Renaud, O. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.09.016 · Cited by 27
Grey, S., Schubel, L., McQueen, J. M., & van Hell, J. G. (2018) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000937 · Cited by 27
Talker-specific predictions during language processing
Ryskin, R. A., Ng, S., Mimnaugh, K. J., Brown‐Schmidt, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1630654 · Cited by 27
Self-citationRational over-specification in visually-situated comprehension and production
Tourtouri, E. N., Delogu, F., Sikos, L., & Crocker, M. W. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00032-6 · Cited by 27
Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension
Fabry, R. E. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02470-9 · Cited by 30
Zacks, J. M., & Ferstl, E. C. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00053-5 · Cited by 27
The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation
Vergara‐Martínez, M., Perea, M., & Leone‐Fernandez, B. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107556 · Cited by 27
Li, W., Marta Kutas, A., Gray, J. A., Hagerman, R. J., & Olichney, J. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.023 · Cited by 27
Windows of Integration Hypothesis Revisited
Hirschhorn, R., Kahane, O., Arie, I. G., Faivre, N., & Mudrik, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.617187 · Cited by 28
Effect of emoji prime on the understanding of emotional words – evidence from ERPs
Yang, J., Yang, Y., Xiu, L., & Yu, G. (2021) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.1874050 · Cited by 27
Dave, S., Brothers, T. A., Hoversten, L. J., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2021) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147573 · Cited by 27
Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain’s Response to Single Words
Huizeling, E., Arana, S., Peter Hagoort, A., & Schoffelen, J. (2021) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00054 · Cited by 28
Time course of gender agreement violations containing emotional words
Díaz‐Lago, M., Fraga, I., & Acuña-Fariña, C. (2015) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.07.001 · Cited by 27
Hoversten, L. J., Brothers, T. A., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00844 · Cited by 27
An incongruent reality: The N400 in relation to psychosis and recovery
Jackson, F. L., Foti, D., Kotov, R., Perlman, G., Mathalon, D. H., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.039 · Cited by 27
An Empirical Reevaluation of Absolute Pitch: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measurements
Elmer, S., Sollberger, S., Meyer, M. E., & Jäncke, L. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00410 · Cited by 27
Sinke, C., Neufeld, J., Wiswede, D., Emrich, H. M., Bleich, S., Münte, T. F., & Szycik, G. R. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00021 · Cited by 27
Emotional words facilitate lexical but not early visual processing
Trauer, S. M., Kotz, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2015) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-015-0225-8 · Cited by 27
Early neurophysiological indices of second language morphosyntax learning
Hanna, J., Юрьевич, Ш. Ю., Williams, J. N., & Friedemann Pulvermüller, A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.001 · Cited by 27
Юрьевич, Ш. Ю., & Lenzen, M. (2016) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2016.1156663 · Cited by 27
Visually Situated Language Comprehension
Knoeferle, P., & Guerra, E. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12177 · Cited by 27
Lewis, A., Schoffelen, J., Hoffmann, C., BASTIAANSEN, M. C. M., & Schriefers, H. J. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1211300 · Cited by 27
Affect-Language Interactions in Native and Non-Native English Speakers
Jończyk, R. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47635-3 · Cited by 27
Ng, S., Payne, B. R., Stine‐Morrow, E. A. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.013 · Cited by 27
Self-citationKamp, S., Endemann, R., Domes, G., & Mecklinger, A. (2018) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2018.12.006 · Cited by 29
Rabovsky, M. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107466 · Cited by 29
Vergara‐Martínez, M., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000942 · Cited by 27
Occipital and orbitofrontal hemodynamics during naturally paced reading: An fNIRS study
Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., Jacobs, A. M., Kliegl, R. M., Radach, R. R., Kuchinke, L., Plichta, M. M., Fallgatter, A. J., & Herrmann, M. J. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.014 · Cited by 28
Linguistic Representation and Processing of CopredicationPreprint
Murphy, E. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yubkz · Cited by 27
Semantic processing in children with cochlear implants: Evidence from event-related potentials
Bell, N., Angwin, A. J., Arnott, W. L., & Wilson, W. J. (2019) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2019.1592119 · Cited by 26
Semantic word integration in children with cochlear implants: electrophysiological evidence
Pierotti, E., Coffey‐Corina, S., Schaefer, T., & Corina, D. P. (2021) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1957954 · Cited by 26
Zeijlstra, H. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.13 · Cited by 26
Predictability in Language Comprehension: Prospects and Problems for Surprisal
Staub, A. (2024) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121517 · Cited by 26
The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects
Burke, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00442 · Cited by 30
Intuitions' Linguistic Sources: Stereotypes, Intuitions and Illusions
Fischer, E., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2016) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12095 · Cited by 29
Integrative and predictive processes in text reading: the N400 across a sentence boundary
Calloway, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1279340 · Cited by 26
Grant, A. M., Grey, S., & van Hell, J. G. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100876 · Cited by 26
Language-Related Neurophysiological Deficits in Schizophrenia
Hirano, S., Spencer, K., Onitsuka, T., & Hirano, Y. (2019) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/1550059419886686 · Cited by 27
Xiong, K., Verdonschot, R. G., & Tamaoka, K. (2020) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100911 · Cited by 26
Facing stereotypes: ERP responses to male and female faces after gender-stereotyped statements
Rodríguez-Gómez, P., Romero‐Ferreiro, V., Pozo, M. A., Hinojosa, J. A., & Moreno, E. M. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa117 · Cited by 26
Huang, S., & Schiller, N. O. (2021) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104889 · Cited by 26
Steber, S., & Rossi, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246421 · Cited by 26
Wang, S., & van den Berg, B. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.023 · Cited by 26
Phillips, I., Calloway, R. C., Karuzis, V. P., Pandža, N. B., O’Rourke, P., & Kuchinsky, S. E. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01783 · Cited by 27
Beyersmann, E., Wegener, S. V., & Kemp, N. (2022) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000342 · Cited by 27
Event‐related potentials show that parafoveal vision is insufficient for semantic integration
Schotter, E. R., Milligan, S., & Estevez, V. M. (2023) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14246 · Cited by 26
Dyck, M., & Brodeur, M. B. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.023 · Cited by 27
Kiang, M., Christensen, B. K., Marta Kutas, A., & Zipursky, R. B. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.02.026 · Cited by 26
Integration of Spoken and Written Words in Beginning Readers: A Topographic ERP Study
Jost, L. B., Eberhard‐Moscicka, A. K., Frisch, C., Dellwo, V., & Maurer, U. (2013) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0336-4 · Cited by 26
Guthormsen, A. M., Fisher, K. J., Bassok, M., Osterhout, L., DeWolf, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12238 · Cited by 26
Meaning first: A case for language-independent access to word meaning in the bilingual brain
Ng, S., & Wicha, N. Y. Y. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.017 · Cited by 26
Stites, M. C., Federmeier, K. D., & Stine‐Morrow, E. A. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0032860 · Cited by 27
Self-citationInconsistent use of gesture space during abstract pointing impairs language comprehension
Gunter, T. C., Weinbrenner, J. E. D., & Holle, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00080 · Cited by 26
ERP Correlates of Recognition Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Massand, E., Bowler, D., Mottron, L., Hosein, A., & Jemel, B. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1755-x · Cited by 26
Getzmann, S., Lewald, J., & Falkenstein, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00413 · Cited by 26
Ye, Z., Doñamayor, N., & Münte, T. F. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22182 · Cited by 26
Hasko, S., Groth, K., Bruder, J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00441 · Cited by 26
Юрьевич, Ш. Ю., & MacGregor, L. J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26558 · Cited by 26
Extending or creating a new brand
Jin, J. K., Wang, C., Yu, L., & Ma, Q. (2015) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000000390 · Cited by 26
Haebig, E., Weber, C., Leonard, L. B., Deevy, P., & Tomblin, J. B. (2017) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-017-9201-1 · Cited by 26
Cook, S., Kokmotou, K., Soto, V., Wright, H., Fallon, N. B., Thomas, A. K., Giesbrecht, T., Field, M., & Stančák, A. (2018) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.032 · Cited by 26
Listening beyond seeing: Event-related potentials to audiovisual processing in visual narrative
Manfredi, M., Cohn, N., Andreoli, M. D. A., & Boggio, P. S. (2018) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.008 · Cited by 26
Hou, G., & Lu, G. (2018) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.020 · Cited by 26
Zhu, Z., BASTIAANSEN, M. C. M., Hakun, J. G., Petersson, K. M., Wang, S., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100855 · Cited by 26
The time course of spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: A unimodal ERP study
Huang, X., Yang, J.-C., Zhang, Q., & Guo, C. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.015 · Cited by 26
Metusalem, R., Marta Kutas, A., Urbach, T. P., & Elman, J. L. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004 · Cited by 26
Sociobiological Bases of Information Structure
Masia, V. (2017) · Advances in interaction studies · doi:10.1075/ais.9 · Cited by 25
de Swart, H. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.26 · Cited by 25
The role of discourse in long-distance dependency formation
Yano, M., & Koizumi, M. (2021) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1883694 · Cited by 25
Negation mitigates rather than inverts the neural representations of adjectives
Zuanazzi, A., Ripollés, P., Lin, W. M., Gwilliams, L., King, J.-R., & Poeppel, D. (2024) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002622 · Cited by 27
Baart, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.06.008 · Cited by 25
Zeev‐Wolf, M., Faust, M., Levkovitz, Y., Harpaz, Y., & Goldstein, A. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12408 · Cited by 25
Stereotypical Inferences: Philosophical Relevance and Psycholinguistic Toolkit
Fischer, E., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2017) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12174 · Cited by 26
The language of arithmetic across the hemispheres: An event-related potential investigation
Dickson, D. S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.02.019 · Cited by 25
Self-citationThe Inhibitory Mechanism in Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language
Lu, Y., Wu, J., Dunlap, S., & Chen, B. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00636 · Cited by 25
Improving free-viewing fixation-related EEG potentials with continuous-time regression
Cornelissen, T. H. W., Sassenhagen, J., & Võ, M. L. ‐. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.12.010 · Cited by 25
Visual narratives and the mind: Comprehension, cognition, and learning
Cohn, N. (2019) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2019.02.002 · Cited by 25
Troyer, M., & Marta Kutas, A. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104111 · Cited by 25
Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items
Giannakidou, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.25 · Cited by 25
Chou, L.-C., Pan, Y.-L., & Lee, C. (2020) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-020-00835-z · Cited by 25
The Role of Iconic Gestures in Speech Comprehension: An Overview of Various Methodologies
Arachchige, K. K., Loureiro, I. S., Blekić, W., Rossignol, M., & Lefèbvre, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634074 · Cited by 29
Silcox, J. W., & Payne, B. R. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.007 · Cited by 28
Campanella, S. (2021) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v11.i5.153 · Cited by 25
Task modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics in semantic brain networks: An EEG/MEG study
Rahimi, S., Farahibozorg, S.-R., Jackson, R. L., & Hauk, O. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118768 · Cited by 25
Emotional violation of faces, emojis, and words: Evidence from N400
Yu, L., Xu, Q., Cao, F., Liu, J., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108405 · Cited by 25
Nissen, A., Conrad, C., & Newman, A. J. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580943 · Cited by 25
Neural evidence for referential understanding of object words in dogs
Boros, M., Magyari, L., Morvai, B., Hernández-Pérez, R., Dror, S., & Andics, A. (2024) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.029 · Cited by 25
Electrophysiological Indices of Phonological Impairments in Dyslexia
Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., Robertson, E. K., & Joanisse, M. F. (2012) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0351 · Cited by 25
Language and sociability: insights from Williams syndrome
Fishman, I., Yam, A., Bellugi, U., & Mills, D. L. (2011) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11689-011-9086-3 · Cited by 25
Event-related potentials during word mapping to object shape predict toddlers' vocabulary size
Borgström, K., Torkildsen, J. V. K., & Lindgren, M. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00143 · Cited by 25
Luka, B. J., & Petten, C. K. V. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.06.001 · Cited by 25
Travis, K. E., Curran, M. M., Torres, C., Leonard, M. K., Brown, T. T., Dale, A. M., Elman, J. L., & Halgren, E. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht052 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Cognitive Science and Neurosciences, Center for Research in Language, Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, California 92093;
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Federmeier, Kara D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2011-01-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 621-647
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- PMC
- PMC4052444
- OpenAlex
- W2141138276
- Cited by
- 4,377
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 317 · 2025: 354 · 2024: 323 · 2023: 302 · 2022: 312 · 2021: 358 · 2020: 434 · 2019: 346 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 274 · 2016: 237 · 2015: 266 · 2014: 220 · 2013: 166 · 2012: 136
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG008313, AG26308, R01AG026308, AG83013)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD022614, R01HD022614)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- N400, event-related potentials, semantic processing, semantic memory, language processing, meaning processing, top-down processing, bottom-up processing, word recognition, pseudowords, mathematical symbols
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Language, Memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
