Cited by 62Motor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionSport Psychology and Performance

Sequence learning in pianists and nonpianists: An fMRI study of motor expertise

Open access
LANDAU, S. M., D'ESPOSITO, M.·2006·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous studies of motor learning have proposed a distinction betweenfast and slow learning, but these mechanisms have rarely been examined simultaneously. We examined the influence of long-term motor expertise (slow learning) while pianists and nonpianists performed alternating epochs of sequenced and random keypresses in response to visual cues (fast learning) during functional neuroimaging. All of the participants demonstrated learning of the sequence as demonstrated by decreasing reaction times (RTs) on sequence trials relative to random trials throughout the session. Pianists also demonstrated faster RTs and superior sequence acquisition in comparison with nonpianists. Within-session decreases in bilateral sensorimotor and parietal activation were observed for both groups. Additionally, there was more extensive activation throughout the session for pianists in comparison with nonpianists across a network of primarily right-lateralized prefrontal, sensorimotor, and parietal regions. These findings provide evidence that different neural systems subserve slow and fast phases of learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.6.3.246

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extended training of a motor skill leads to increased rather than decreased task-related activation of the sensorimotor cortex.

    “For instance, extended training of a motor skill leads to increased rather than decreased task-related activation of the sensorimotor cortex [56–58, 64–65], and extended training (e.g., for two years) induces learning-related changes in task-related activity of neurons in primary motor cortex [4].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musi- cians and nonmusicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240-9245.
  2. Kung, S. J., Lin, C. H., Lee, P.-L., Wu, Y.-T., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2002). Bimanual coordination and motor learning in piano players and non- musicians: A 3T fMRI study. Paper presented at Human Brain Map- ping Annual Conference.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LANDAU, S. M., & D'ESPOSITO, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
LANDAU, S. M.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
246-259
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2055891476
Cited by
62
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Dana Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • UC Berkeley College of Chemistry
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063901, MH 63901)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS40813, P01NS040813)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
sequence learning, motor expertise, pianists, motor learning, reaction time, sensorimotor cortex, parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex, hemispheric lateralization, neural correlates of learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Music, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Serial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review