The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competing Risks in Mortality Analysis
Abstract
In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scientific research examining the multiple ways in which racism can adversely affect health. This interest has been driven in part by the striking persistence of racial/ethnic inequities in health and ...Read More
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of empirical data on associations between causes of death has until now prevented a solution from being developed for the problem of competing causes in cause-elimination life tables.
“Although this problem of”
From Gains in life expectancy after elimination of major causes of death: revised estimates taking into account the effect of competing causes. (1999) · cites this paper as [6]
Conventional cause-elimination life table calculations rest on the assumption that those saved from dying because of the eliminated cause have risks of dying from non-eliminated causes equal to the average risks of dying from these causes in the total population.
“The main assumption on which cause-elimination life table calculations rest is, that those who are saved from dying because of the eliminated cause (for example, ischaemic heart disease) have risks of dying from non-eliminated causes that are equal to the average risks of dying from these causes as observed in the total population.”
From Gains in life expectancy after elimination of major causes of death: revised estimates taking into account the effect of competing causes. (1999) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Delgado-Rodríguez, M., & Llorca, J. (2004) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.008466 · Cited by 1,064
Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality.
Wong, M. D., Shapiro, M. F., Boscardin, W. J., & Ettner, S. L. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012979 · Cited by 774
HIV and aging: time for a new paradigm.
Justice, A. C. (2010) · Current HIV/AIDS Reports · doi:10.1007/s11904-010-0041-9 · Cited by 309
Pancreatic cancer patients who smoke and drink are diagnosed at younger ages
Brand, R. E., Greer, J. B., Zolotarevsky, E., Brand, R., Du, H., Simeone, D., Zisman, A., Gorchow, A., Lee, S. (., Roy, H. K., et al. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.008 · Cited by 57
Mackenbach, J. P., Kunst, A. E., Lautenbach, H., Oei, Y. B., & Bijlsma, F. (1999) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.53.1.32 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiang, C. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Public Health
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 281-307
- ISSN
- 0163-7525
- 1545-2093
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
