The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INEQUALITY IN EARNINGS AT THE CLOSE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Abstract
▪ Abstract Median income in the United States has fallen and the distribution of income has grown markedly more unequal over the past three decades, reversing a general pattern of earnings growth and equalization dating back to 1929. Median trends were not the same for all groups—women's earnings generally increased—but the growth in earnings inequality has been experienced by all groups. Even white men employed full-time, year-round—traditionally the most privileged and secure group—could not escape wage stagnation and polarization. These patterns suggest research questions that go beyond conventional sociological interest in racial and gender wage gaps, refocusing attention on more general changes in labor market dynamics. The debates over the origins of the rise in US inequality cover a wide range of issues that can be roughly grouped into four categories: the changing demographics of the labor force, the impact of economic restructuring, the role of political context and institutions, and the dynamics of globalization. We review the empirical literature here, and challenge the field of sociology to reconstruct its research agenda on stratification and inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870
How Unregulated Is the U.S. Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution
Western, B., & Beckett, K. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210135 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled
England, P. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210361475 · Cited by 1,687
Incarceration and Stratification
Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · Cited by 747
Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet
Fuchs, C. (2010) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972241003712215 · Cited by 630
The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand
Mijs, J. J. B. (2021) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwy051 · Cited by 585
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, M., & Western, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 623-657
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2129487554
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.