The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving business and information strategy alignment: Learning from the banking industry
Abstract
An empirical study that explored business and information strategy alignment in the information-intensive and competitive Australian banking industry is featured in this paper. The aim of the study was to identify organizational practices that contribute to and enhance such alignment. Multiple sources of information were used to collect data about business and information strategies from the major firms dominating Australian banking. Sources included written and interview-based information, strategic planning documentation, and annual reports. Evidence was sought for the alignment of business and information strategies through the use of information and information technology that provided a comparative advantage to an organization over its competitors. The firm-wide strategy-formation processes of the banks, rather than their information systems (I/S) methodology, was central to the alignment of business and information strategies. The interdependence of firm-wide processes and I/S factors are emphasized in a strategic alignment model that summarizes the findings of the study. The paper concludes with a discussion of the management implications and requirements for action in both firm-wide strategy and I/S areas. The results of this study in the banking industry are pertinent to other industries where information technology and systems are playing an increasingly strategic role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems
Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Cited by
Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.1999.5387096 · Cited by 3,498
Employees' affective commitment to change: The key to successful CRM implementation
Shum, P., Bove, L., & Auh, S. (2008) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560810903709 · Cited by 159
Understanding the role of the technical in the build-up of sociotechnical constituencies
Molina, A. H. (1998) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(98)00093-5 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadbent, M., & Weill, P.
- Venue
- IBM Systems Journal
- Publisher
- IBM
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-179
- ISSN
- 0018-8670 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022676289
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving business and information strategy alignment: Learning from the banking industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1147/sj.321.0162
- The paper
- Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1993). Improving business and information strategy alignment: Learning from the banking industry. IBM Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.321.0162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.