Cited by 73Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCoronary Artery Anomalies

Coronary CT versus MR angiography: the role of MR angiography

Sakuma, Hajime·2011·Radiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.10100116

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using MRA instead of CT avoids ionizing radiation exposure, which is beneficial for longitudinal monitoring.

    “An added advantage using MRA instead of CT is that patients are not exposed to ionizing radiation, which is beneficial to perform longitudinal monitoring [183].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakuma, H.
Affiliations
Mie University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakuma, Hajime
Venue
Radiology
Published
2011-02
Volume
258
Issue
2
Pages
340-349
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2082172322
Cited by
73
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
Keywords
coronary CT angiography, coronary magnetic resonance angiography, coronary artery disease, cardiac imaging, diagnostic imaging comparison
MeSH terms
Contrast Media, Coronary Disease, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review