Cited by 47Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCognitive Functions and Memory

Sex Differences in Working Memory after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Functional MR Imaging Study

Hsu, Hui-Ling, Chen, David Yen-Ting, Tseng, Ying-Chi, Kuo, Ying-Sheng, Huang, Yen-Lin, Chiu, Wen-Ta, Yan, Feng-Xian, Wang, Wei-Shuan +1 more·2015·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate sex differences in mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) with working memory functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. Working memory brain activation patterns were assessed with functional MR imaging in 30 patients (15 consecutive men and 15 consecutive women) with MTBI and 30 control subjects (15 consecutive men and 15 consecutive women). Two imaging studies were performed in patients: the initial study, which was performed within 1 month after the injury, and a follow-up study, which was performed 6 weeks after the first study. For each participant, digit span and continuous performance testing were performed before functional MR imaging. Clinical data were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, and Fisher exact tests. Within- and between-group differences of functional MR imaging data were analyzed with one- and two-sample t tests, respectively. RESULTS: Among female participants, the total digit span score was lower in the MTBI group than in the control group (P = .044). In initial working memory functional MR imaging studies, hyperactivation was found in the male MTBI group and hypoactivation was found in the female MTBI group compared with control male and female groups, respectively. At the 6-week follow-up study, the female MTBI group showed persistent hypoactivation, whereas the male MTBI group showed a regression of hyperactivation at visual comparison of activation maps. The male MTBI group was also found to have a higher initial ß value than the male control group (P = .040), and there was no significant difference between the male MTBI group and the male control group (P = .221) at follow-up evaluation, which was comparable to findings on activation maps. In the female MTBI group, average ß values at both initial and follow-up studies were lower compared with those in the female control group but were not statistically significant (P = .663 and P = .191, respectively). CONCLUSION: Female patients with MTBI had lower digit span scores than did female control subjects, and functional MR imaging depicted sex differences in working memory functional activation; hypoactivation with nonrecovery of activation change at follow-up studies may suggest a worse working memory outcome in female patients with MTBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2015142549

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sex-related differences in fMRI activity, heart rate variability, edema, and intracranial hypertension were reported even in the absence of differences in cognition, post-concussive symptoms, duration of recovery, and GOS.

    “Indeed, sex-related differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity, heart rate variability, edema, and intracranial hypertension were reported even in the absence of differences in cognition, post-concussive symptoms, duration of recovery, and GOS. 13,55,56”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, H.-L., Chen, D. Y.-T., Tseng, Y.-C., Kuo, Y.-S., Huang, Y.-L., Chiu, W.-T., Yan, F.-X., Wang, W.-S., & Chen, C.-J.
Affiliations
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2015-09
Volume
276
Issue
3
Pages
828-835
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2128243949
Cited by
47
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Taipei Medical University Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, sex differences, working memory, brain activation, hypoactivation, hyperactivation, digit span, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review