Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ECG-gated Reconstructed Multi–Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Varying Trigger Delay on Image Quality

Hong, Cheng, Becker, Christoph R., Huber, Armin, Schoepf, U. Joseph, Ohnesorge, Bernd, Knez, Andreas, Brüning, Roland, Reiser, Maximilian F.·2001·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated retrospective image reconstruction for multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography in reducing cardiac motion artifacts and to evaluate the influence of heart rate on cardiac image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with different heart rates underwent coronary CT angiography. Raw helical CT data and ECG tracings were combined to retrospectively reconstruct at the defined consecutive z position with a temporal resolution of 250 msec per section. The starting points of the reconstruction were chosen between 30% and 80% of the R-R intervals. The relationships between heart rate, trigger delay, and image quality were analyzed. RESULTS: Optimal image quality was achieved with a 50% trigger delay for the right coronary artery and 60% for the left circumflex coronary artery. Optimal image quality for the left anterior descending coronary artery was equally obtained at 50% and 60% triggering. A significant negative correlation was observed between heart rate and image quality (P <.05). The best image quality was achieved when the heart rate was less than 74.5 beats per minute. CONCLUSION: To achieve high image quality, the heart rate should be sufficiently slow. Selection of appropriate trigger delays and a decreasing heart rate are effective to reduce cardiac motion artifacts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2203010055

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Hong, C., Becker, C. R., Huber, A., Schoepf, U. J., Ohnesorge, B., Knez, A., Brüning, R., & Reiser, M. F.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2001-09
Volume
220
Issue
3
Pages
712-717
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2138425831
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
23.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ECG-gated Reconstructed Multi–Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Varying Trigger Delay on Image Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2203010055
The paper
Hong, C., Becker, C. R., Huber, A., Schoepf, U. J., Ohnesorge, B., Knez, A., Brüning, R., & Reiser, M. F. (2001). ECG-gated Reconstructed Multi–Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Varying Trigger Delay on Image Quality. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2203010055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.